How to store user activity that supports undo?
I can track user activity on posts, so that users can see for example "2 updates!". The essence of the strategy I’m using leverages 2 tables:
post_activity:
post_id | user_id | time_created
post_users:
post_id | user_id | time_created | time_last_seen
With these 2 tables, I can query all records from post_activity where the post_user.time_last_seen is less than the post_activity.time_created for a count of all new items.
The problem is that post_activity is essentially an anonymous log, with no associated rows or notion of the type of action that caused it. What I can’t solve is for example this scenario:
- User A creates new post (1 new activity stored)
- User B comments on new post (1 new activity stored)
- User C sees "2 new!" but...
- User A or B deletes their contribution.
As far as the system is concerned, there are 2 unseen items but the user may see nothing!
Can anyone provide a simple demonstration of how I might have a stronger relationship between activity and user actions here? Particularly one that supports unseen deleted activity?
postgresql database-design
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 11 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
I can track user activity on posts, so that users can see for example "2 updates!". The essence of the strategy I’m using leverages 2 tables:
post_activity:
post_id | user_id | time_created
post_users:
post_id | user_id | time_created | time_last_seen
With these 2 tables, I can query all records from post_activity where the post_user.time_last_seen is less than the post_activity.time_created for a count of all new items.
The problem is that post_activity is essentially an anonymous log, with no associated rows or notion of the type of action that caused it. What I can’t solve is for example this scenario:
- User A creates new post (1 new activity stored)
- User B comments on new post (1 new activity stored)
- User C sees "2 new!" but...
- User A or B deletes their contribution.
As far as the system is concerned, there are 2 unseen items but the user may see nothing!
Can anyone provide a simple demonstration of how I might have a stronger relationship between activity and user actions here? Particularly one that supports unseen deleted activity?
postgresql database-design
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 11 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
copy on write to post_activity_history table
– Neil McGuigan
Mar 24 '16 at 20:13
add a comment |
I can track user activity on posts, so that users can see for example "2 updates!". The essence of the strategy I’m using leverages 2 tables:
post_activity:
post_id | user_id | time_created
post_users:
post_id | user_id | time_created | time_last_seen
With these 2 tables, I can query all records from post_activity where the post_user.time_last_seen is less than the post_activity.time_created for a count of all new items.
The problem is that post_activity is essentially an anonymous log, with no associated rows or notion of the type of action that caused it. What I can’t solve is for example this scenario:
- User A creates new post (1 new activity stored)
- User B comments on new post (1 new activity stored)
- User C sees "2 new!" but...
- User A or B deletes their contribution.
As far as the system is concerned, there are 2 unseen items but the user may see nothing!
Can anyone provide a simple demonstration of how I might have a stronger relationship between activity and user actions here? Particularly one that supports unseen deleted activity?
postgresql database-design
I can track user activity on posts, so that users can see for example "2 updates!". The essence of the strategy I’m using leverages 2 tables:
post_activity:
post_id | user_id | time_created
post_users:
post_id | user_id | time_created | time_last_seen
With these 2 tables, I can query all records from post_activity where the post_user.time_last_seen is less than the post_activity.time_created for a count of all new items.
The problem is that post_activity is essentially an anonymous log, with no associated rows or notion of the type of action that caused it. What I can’t solve is for example this scenario:
- User A creates new post (1 new activity stored)
- User B comments on new post (1 new activity stored)
- User C sees "2 new!" but...
- User A or B deletes their contribution.
As far as the system is concerned, there are 2 unseen items but the user may see nothing!
Can anyone provide a simple demonstration of how I might have a stronger relationship between activity and user actions here? Particularly one that supports unseen deleted activity?
postgresql database-design
postgresql database-design
asked Mar 24 '16 at 0:05
jlmakesjlmakes
1062
1062
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 11 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 11 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
copy on write to post_activity_history table
– Neil McGuigan
Mar 24 '16 at 20:13
add a comment |
copy on write to post_activity_history table
– Neil McGuigan
Mar 24 '16 at 20:13
copy on write to post_activity_history table
– Neil McGuigan
Mar 24 '16 at 20:13
copy on write to post_activity_history table
– Neil McGuigan
Mar 24 '16 at 20:13
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Create a TRIGGER on the table in which deletes are recorded and update related tables as required.
Relevant postgresql documentation
- Info about triggers: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/triggers.html
- How to create a trigger: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/sql-createtrigger.html
I think triggers could be a good fit here, but what I’m still unclear on is how to target the right record in the activity table—I can’t just remove the most recent, because other activity may be generated before someone deletes an unseen post.
– jlmakes
Mar 24 '16 at 19:06
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f133234%2fhow-to-store-user-activity-that-supports-undo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Create a TRIGGER on the table in which deletes are recorded and update related tables as required.
Relevant postgresql documentation
- Info about triggers: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/triggers.html
- How to create a trigger: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/sql-createtrigger.html
I think triggers could be a good fit here, but what I’m still unclear on is how to target the right record in the activity table—I can’t just remove the most recent, because other activity may be generated before someone deletes an unseen post.
– jlmakes
Mar 24 '16 at 19:06
add a comment |
Create a TRIGGER on the table in which deletes are recorded and update related tables as required.
Relevant postgresql documentation
- Info about triggers: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/triggers.html
- How to create a trigger: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/sql-createtrigger.html
I think triggers could be a good fit here, but what I’m still unclear on is how to target the right record in the activity table—I can’t just remove the most recent, because other activity may be generated before someone deletes an unseen post.
– jlmakes
Mar 24 '16 at 19:06
add a comment |
Create a TRIGGER on the table in which deletes are recorded and update related tables as required.
Relevant postgresql documentation
- Info about triggers: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/triggers.html
- How to create a trigger: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/sql-createtrigger.html
Create a TRIGGER on the table in which deletes are recorded and update related tables as required.
Relevant postgresql documentation
- Info about triggers: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/triggers.html
- How to create a trigger: http://www.postgresql.org/docs/9.5/static/sql-createtrigger.html
answered Mar 24 '16 at 15:09
SergeSerge
49738
49738
I think triggers could be a good fit here, but what I’m still unclear on is how to target the right record in the activity table—I can’t just remove the most recent, because other activity may be generated before someone deletes an unseen post.
– jlmakes
Mar 24 '16 at 19:06
add a comment |
I think triggers could be a good fit here, but what I’m still unclear on is how to target the right record in the activity table—I can’t just remove the most recent, because other activity may be generated before someone deletes an unseen post.
– jlmakes
Mar 24 '16 at 19:06
I think triggers could be a good fit here, but what I’m still unclear on is how to target the right record in the activity table—I can’t just remove the most recent, because other activity may be generated before someone deletes an unseen post.
– jlmakes
Mar 24 '16 at 19:06
I think triggers could be a good fit here, but what I’m still unclear on is how to target the right record in the activity table—I can’t just remove the most recent, because other activity may be generated before someone deletes an unseen post.
– jlmakes
Mar 24 '16 at 19:06
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f133234%2fhow-to-store-user-activity-that-supports-undo%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
copy on write to post_activity_history table
– Neil McGuigan
Mar 24 '16 at 20:13