Different plans on Readonly Secondary Replica












1















We have an AlwaysOn environment where we use the async readonly secondary replica for reporting purpose.



One of the reports intermittently runs for much longer than normal. I can see when it runs slowly the plan is taking a different route and causing a clustered index scan on a big table.



However, when I run the same query in primary replica it runs fine and generates a plan that is what we expect.



Why does it generate a good plan on the primary replica but a bad plan on the secondary? what are the possible reasons?



The servers have exactly the same hardware and the configuration is the same.










share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 23 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
















  • Are there any temporary stats on the secondary that it may be using? use MyDB; go; SELECT * FROM sys.stats where is_temporary = 1;

    – Sean Gallardy
    Feb 5 '17 at 1:21











  • Yeah, thats the bit i am confused about. When I do SELECT * FROM sys.stats where is_temporary = 1 and object_id=object_id('tablename') I find a few but non that ends with suffix _readonly_database_statistic. So what does that mean. How are they temporary without having the suffix _readonly_database_statistic

    – jesijesi
    Feb 5 '17 at 1:27













  • This sounds like a possible bug around temporary statistics on readonly secondaries. Perhaps file a bug report on connect.microsoft.com - also, see duckduckgo.com/… for several possibly related issues.

    – Max Vernon
    Feb 14 '17 at 18:22
















1















We have an AlwaysOn environment where we use the async readonly secondary replica for reporting purpose.



One of the reports intermittently runs for much longer than normal. I can see when it runs slowly the plan is taking a different route and causing a clustered index scan on a big table.



However, when I run the same query in primary replica it runs fine and generates a plan that is what we expect.



Why does it generate a good plan on the primary replica but a bad plan on the secondary? what are the possible reasons?



The servers have exactly the same hardware and the configuration is the same.










share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 23 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
















  • Are there any temporary stats on the secondary that it may be using? use MyDB; go; SELECT * FROM sys.stats where is_temporary = 1;

    – Sean Gallardy
    Feb 5 '17 at 1:21











  • Yeah, thats the bit i am confused about. When I do SELECT * FROM sys.stats where is_temporary = 1 and object_id=object_id('tablename') I find a few but non that ends with suffix _readonly_database_statistic. So what does that mean. How are they temporary without having the suffix _readonly_database_statistic

    – jesijesi
    Feb 5 '17 at 1:27













  • This sounds like a possible bug around temporary statistics on readonly secondaries. Perhaps file a bug report on connect.microsoft.com - also, see duckduckgo.com/… for several possibly related issues.

    – Max Vernon
    Feb 14 '17 at 18:22














1












1








1


1






We have an AlwaysOn environment where we use the async readonly secondary replica for reporting purpose.



One of the reports intermittently runs for much longer than normal. I can see when it runs slowly the plan is taking a different route and causing a clustered index scan on a big table.



However, when I run the same query in primary replica it runs fine and generates a plan that is what we expect.



Why does it generate a good plan on the primary replica but a bad plan on the secondary? what are the possible reasons?



The servers have exactly the same hardware and the configuration is the same.










share|improve this question
















We have an AlwaysOn environment where we use the async readonly secondary replica for reporting purpose.



One of the reports intermittently runs for much longer than normal. I can see when it runs slowly the plan is taking a different route and causing a clustered index scan on a big table.



However, when I run the same query in primary replica it runs fine and generates a plan that is what we expect.



Why does it generate a good plan on the primary replica but a bad plan on the secondary? what are the possible reasons?



The servers have exactly the same hardware and the configuration is the same.







sql-server query-performance sql-server-2014 optimization cardinality-estimates






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 14 '17 at 17:54









Max Vernon

50.2k13111220




50.2k13111220










asked Feb 5 '17 at 0:16









jesijesijesijesi

878419




878419





bumped to the homepage by Community 23 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 23 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • Are there any temporary stats on the secondary that it may be using? use MyDB; go; SELECT * FROM sys.stats where is_temporary = 1;

    – Sean Gallardy
    Feb 5 '17 at 1:21











  • Yeah, thats the bit i am confused about. When I do SELECT * FROM sys.stats where is_temporary = 1 and object_id=object_id('tablename') I find a few but non that ends with suffix _readonly_database_statistic. So what does that mean. How are they temporary without having the suffix _readonly_database_statistic

    – jesijesi
    Feb 5 '17 at 1:27













  • This sounds like a possible bug around temporary statistics on readonly secondaries. Perhaps file a bug report on connect.microsoft.com - also, see duckduckgo.com/… for several possibly related issues.

    – Max Vernon
    Feb 14 '17 at 18:22



















  • Are there any temporary stats on the secondary that it may be using? use MyDB; go; SELECT * FROM sys.stats where is_temporary = 1;

    – Sean Gallardy
    Feb 5 '17 at 1:21











  • Yeah, thats the bit i am confused about. When I do SELECT * FROM sys.stats where is_temporary = 1 and object_id=object_id('tablename') I find a few but non that ends with suffix _readonly_database_statistic. So what does that mean. How are they temporary without having the suffix _readonly_database_statistic

    – jesijesi
    Feb 5 '17 at 1:27













  • This sounds like a possible bug around temporary statistics on readonly secondaries. Perhaps file a bug report on connect.microsoft.com - also, see duckduckgo.com/… for several possibly related issues.

    – Max Vernon
    Feb 14 '17 at 18:22

















Are there any temporary stats on the secondary that it may be using? use MyDB; go; SELECT * FROM sys.stats where is_temporary = 1;

– Sean Gallardy
Feb 5 '17 at 1:21





Are there any temporary stats on the secondary that it may be using? use MyDB; go; SELECT * FROM sys.stats where is_temporary = 1;

– Sean Gallardy
Feb 5 '17 at 1:21













Yeah, thats the bit i am confused about. When I do SELECT * FROM sys.stats where is_temporary = 1 and object_id=object_id('tablename') I find a few but non that ends with suffix _readonly_database_statistic. So what does that mean. How are they temporary without having the suffix _readonly_database_statistic

– jesijesi
Feb 5 '17 at 1:27







Yeah, thats the bit i am confused about. When I do SELECT * FROM sys.stats where is_temporary = 1 and object_id=object_id('tablename') I find a few but non that ends with suffix _readonly_database_statistic. So what does that mean. How are they temporary without having the suffix _readonly_database_statistic

– jesijesi
Feb 5 '17 at 1:27















This sounds like a possible bug around temporary statistics on readonly secondaries. Perhaps file a bug report on connect.microsoft.com - also, see duckduckgo.com/… for several possibly related issues.

– Max Vernon
Feb 14 '17 at 18:22





This sounds like a possible bug around temporary statistics on readonly secondaries. Perhaps file a bug report on connect.microsoft.com - also, see duckduckgo.com/… for several possibly related issues.

– Max Vernon
Feb 14 '17 at 18:22










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















0














It seems to be a bug in SQL Server, if you are using SQL Server 2012, 2014, or 2016 install the latest SP with CU that has a fix to This.



Details here:



FIX: Bad query plan created on secondary replicas after statistics updated via FULLSCAN option on primary replica in SQL Server 2012 or 2014






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "182"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f163239%2fdifferent-plans-on-readonly-secondary-replica%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes








    1 Answer
    1






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    0














    It seems to be a bug in SQL Server, if you are using SQL Server 2012, 2014, or 2016 install the latest SP with CU that has a fix to This.



    Details here:



    FIX: Bad query plan created on secondary replicas after statistics updated via FULLSCAN option on primary replica in SQL Server 2012 or 2014






    share|improve this answer






























      0














      It seems to be a bug in SQL Server, if you are using SQL Server 2012, 2014, or 2016 install the latest SP with CU that has a fix to This.



      Details here:



      FIX: Bad query plan created on secondary replicas after statistics updated via FULLSCAN option on primary replica in SQL Server 2012 or 2014






      share|improve this answer




























        0












        0








        0







        It seems to be a bug in SQL Server, if you are using SQL Server 2012, 2014, or 2016 install the latest SP with CU that has a fix to This.



        Details here:



        FIX: Bad query plan created on secondary replicas after statistics updated via FULLSCAN option on primary replica in SQL Server 2012 or 2014






        share|improve this answer















        It seems to be a bug in SQL Server, if you are using SQL Server 2012, 2014, or 2016 install the latest SP with CU that has a fix to This.



        Details here:



        FIX: Bad query plan created on secondary replicas after statistics updated via FULLSCAN option on primary replica in SQL Server 2012 or 2014







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited Jul 5 '17 at 11:48









        SqlWorldWide

        8,04521335




        8,04521335










        answered Jul 5 '17 at 10:02









        AhmadYaseenAhmadYaseen

        1




        1






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f163239%2fdifferent-plans-on-readonly-secondary-replica%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            Popular posts from this blog

            ف. موراي أبراهام

            صرب

            كأس إنترتوتو