Computation of the derivative of a certain cubic root function using only the definition of a derivative












9












$begingroup$


First post here, so hello everyone.



Here's the problem:




Find the first derivative of: $$sqrt[3]{sin(2x)}$$




But, you can only use the difference quotient...
(i.e. the limit of $frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}$ as $h rightarrow 0$)



This is a particular problem given by my prof. It's not for credit or even an assignment, she gave it as an interestingly difficult problem with some twist and turns. I've worked on it for several hours now and would like to see how others approach solving it as I'm wrapped around an axel after using double-angle ID and clearing the cubes in the numerator. Any advice is appreciated.



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Sawyer Benson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Can you give some context on why you want to do that with only the difference quotient? Surely you can replicate the proof of the chain rule, but it's not going to be pretty (although pointless all the more).
    $endgroup$
    – Klaus
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Sure, Klaus. This is a particular problem given by my prof. It's not for credit of even an assignment, she gave it as an interestingly difficult problem with some twist and turns. I've worked on it for several hours now and would like to see how others approach solving it as I'm wrapped around an axel after using double-angle ID and clearing the cubes in the numerator. Any advice is appreciated.
    $endgroup$
    – Sawyer Benson
    11 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Use sin instead of sin in $rmLaTeX$! It's a built-in function to make it look nice :)
    $endgroup$
    – Cameron Williams
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think you'd have to use the generalized binomial theorem for what it's worth. It's been a while since I did non-integer powers with the limit definition so I might be wrong. The integer power case uses the regular binomial theorem+factoring so I think using the generalized binomial theorem is appropriate.
    $endgroup$
    – Cameron Williams
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks, Cameron! Unfortunately I cannot use that either. I know how to solve it using the chain rule and even L'Hopital's rule, however, the challenge it to solving it algebraically using nothing more than trig IDs (half angle) and trig limit rules (lim of sinx/x = 1). I know it's a pain, but that's the game! Thanks for all the help!
    $endgroup$
    – Sawyer Benson
    11 hours ago
















9












$begingroup$


First post here, so hello everyone.



Here's the problem:




Find the first derivative of: $$sqrt[3]{sin(2x)}$$




But, you can only use the difference quotient...
(i.e. the limit of $frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}$ as $h rightarrow 0$)



This is a particular problem given by my prof. It's not for credit or even an assignment, she gave it as an interestingly difficult problem with some twist and turns. I've worked on it for several hours now and would like to see how others approach solving it as I'm wrapped around an axel after using double-angle ID and clearing the cubes in the numerator. Any advice is appreciated.



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Sawyer Benson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Can you give some context on why you want to do that with only the difference quotient? Surely you can replicate the proof of the chain rule, but it's not going to be pretty (although pointless all the more).
    $endgroup$
    – Klaus
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Sure, Klaus. This is a particular problem given by my prof. It's not for credit of even an assignment, she gave it as an interestingly difficult problem with some twist and turns. I've worked on it for several hours now and would like to see how others approach solving it as I'm wrapped around an axel after using double-angle ID and clearing the cubes in the numerator. Any advice is appreciated.
    $endgroup$
    – Sawyer Benson
    11 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Use sin instead of sin in $rmLaTeX$! It's a built-in function to make it look nice :)
    $endgroup$
    – Cameron Williams
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think you'd have to use the generalized binomial theorem for what it's worth. It's been a while since I did non-integer powers with the limit definition so I might be wrong. The integer power case uses the regular binomial theorem+factoring so I think using the generalized binomial theorem is appropriate.
    $endgroup$
    – Cameron Williams
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks, Cameron! Unfortunately I cannot use that either. I know how to solve it using the chain rule and even L'Hopital's rule, however, the challenge it to solving it algebraically using nothing more than trig IDs (half angle) and trig limit rules (lim of sinx/x = 1). I know it's a pain, but that's the game! Thanks for all the help!
    $endgroup$
    – Sawyer Benson
    11 hours ago














9












9








9


1



$begingroup$


First post here, so hello everyone.



Here's the problem:




Find the first derivative of: $$sqrt[3]{sin(2x)}$$




But, you can only use the difference quotient...
(i.e. the limit of $frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}$ as $h rightarrow 0$)



This is a particular problem given by my prof. It's not for credit or even an assignment, she gave it as an interestingly difficult problem with some twist and turns. I've worked on it for several hours now and would like to see how others approach solving it as I'm wrapped around an axel after using double-angle ID and clearing the cubes in the numerator. Any advice is appreciated.



Thanks.










share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Sawyer Benson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.







$endgroup$




First post here, so hello everyone.



Here's the problem:




Find the first derivative of: $$sqrt[3]{sin(2x)}$$




But, you can only use the difference quotient...
(i.e. the limit of $frac{f(x+h)-f(x)}{h}$ as $h rightarrow 0$)



This is a particular problem given by my prof. It's not for credit or even an assignment, she gave it as an interestingly difficult problem with some twist and turns. I've worked on it for several hours now and would like to see how others approach solving it as I'm wrapped around an axel after using double-angle ID and clearing the cubes in the numerator. Any advice is appreciated.



Thanks.







calculus derivatives trigonometry






share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Sawyer Benson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|cite|improve this question









New contributor




Sawyer Benson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 1 hour ago









Jean Marie

29.8k42051




29.8k42051






New contributor




Sawyer Benson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked 11 hours ago









Sawyer BensonSawyer Benson

494




494




New contributor




Sawyer Benson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





Sawyer Benson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






Sawyer Benson is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Can you give some context on why you want to do that with only the difference quotient? Surely you can replicate the proof of the chain rule, but it's not going to be pretty (although pointless all the more).
    $endgroup$
    – Klaus
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Sure, Klaus. This is a particular problem given by my prof. It's not for credit of even an assignment, she gave it as an interestingly difficult problem with some twist and turns. I've worked on it for several hours now and would like to see how others approach solving it as I'm wrapped around an axel after using double-angle ID and clearing the cubes in the numerator. Any advice is appreciated.
    $endgroup$
    – Sawyer Benson
    11 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Use sin instead of sin in $rmLaTeX$! It's a built-in function to make it look nice :)
    $endgroup$
    – Cameron Williams
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think you'd have to use the generalized binomial theorem for what it's worth. It's been a while since I did non-integer powers with the limit definition so I might be wrong. The integer power case uses the regular binomial theorem+factoring so I think using the generalized binomial theorem is appropriate.
    $endgroup$
    – Cameron Williams
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks, Cameron! Unfortunately I cannot use that either. I know how to solve it using the chain rule and even L'Hopital's rule, however, the challenge it to solving it algebraically using nothing more than trig IDs (half angle) and trig limit rules (lim of sinx/x = 1). I know it's a pain, but that's the game! Thanks for all the help!
    $endgroup$
    – Sawyer Benson
    11 hours ago














  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Can you give some context on why you want to do that with only the difference quotient? Surely you can replicate the proof of the chain rule, but it's not going to be pretty (although pointless all the more).
    $endgroup$
    – Klaus
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    Sure, Klaus. This is a particular problem given by my prof. It's not for credit of even an assignment, she gave it as an interestingly difficult problem with some twist and turns. I've worked on it for several hours now and would like to see how others approach solving it as I'm wrapped around an axel after using double-angle ID and clearing the cubes in the numerator. Any advice is appreciated.
    $endgroup$
    – Sawyer Benson
    11 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    Use sin instead of sin in $rmLaTeX$! It's a built-in function to make it look nice :)
    $endgroup$
    – Cameron Williams
    11 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    I think you'd have to use the generalized binomial theorem for what it's worth. It's been a while since I did non-integer powers with the limit definition so I might be wrong. The integer power case uses the regular binomial theorem+factoring so I think using the generalized binomial theorem is appropriate.
    $endgroup$
    – Cameron Williams
    11 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Thanks, Cameron! Unfortunately I cannot use that either. I know how to solve it using the chain rule and even L'Hopital's rule, however, the challenge it to solving it algebraically using nothing more than trig IDs (half angle) and trig limit rules (lim of sinx/x = 1). I know it's a pain, but that's the game! Thanks for all the help!
    $endgroup$
    – Sawyer Benson
    11 hours ago








2




2




$begingroup$
Can you give some context on why you want to do that with only the difference quotient? Surely you can replicate the proof of the chain rule, but it's not going to be pretty (although pointless all the more).
$endgroup$
– Klaus
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
Can you give some context on why you want to do that with only the difference quotient? Surely you can replicate the proof of the chain rule, but it's not going to be pretty (although pointless all the more).
$endgroup$
– Klaus
11 hours ago












$begingroup$
Sure, Klaus. This is a particular problem given by my prof. It's not for credit of even an assignment, she gave it as an interestingly difficult problem with some twist and turns. I've worked on it for several hours now and would like to see how others approach solving it as I'm wrapped around an axel after using double-angle ID and clearing the cubes in the numerator. Any advice is appreciated.
$endgroup$
– Sawyer Benson
11 hours ago






$begingroup$
Sure, Klaus. This is a particular problem given by my prof. It's not for credit of even an assignment, she gave it as an interestingly difficult problem with some twist and turns. I've worked on it for several hours now and would like to see how others approach solving it as I'm wrapped around an axel after using double-angle ID and clearing the cubes in the numerator. Any advice is appreciated.
$endgroup$
– Sawyer Benson
11 hours ago














$begingroup$
Use sin instead of sin in $rmLaTeX$! It's a built-in function to make it look nice :)
$endgroup$
– Cameron Williams
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
Use sin instead of sin in $rmLaTeX$! It's a built-in function to make it look nice :)
$endgroup$
– Cameron Williams
11 hours ago












$begingroup$
I think you'd have to use the generalized binomial theorem for what it's worth. It's been a while since I did non-integer powers with the limit definition so I might be wrong. The integer power case uses the regular binomial theorem+factoring so I think using the generalized binomial theorem is appropriate.
$endgroup$
– Cameron Williams
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
I think you'd have to use the generalized binomial theorem for what it's worth. It's been a while since I did non-integer powers with the limit definition so I might be wrong. The integer power case uses the regular binomial theorem+factoring so I think using the generalized binomial theorem is appropriate.
$endgroup$
– Cameron Williams
11 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Thanks, Cameron! Unfortunately I cannot use that either. I know how to solve it using the chain rule and even L'Hopital's rule, however, the challenge it to solving it algebraically using nothing more than trig IDs (half angle) and trig limit rules (lim of sinx/x = 1). I know it's a pain, but that's the game! Thanks for all the help!
$endgroup$
– Sawyer Benson
11 hours ago




$begingroup$
Thanks, Cameron! Unfortunately I cannot use that either. I know how to solve it using the chain rule and even L'Hopital's rule, however, the challenge it to solving it algebraically using nothing more than trig IDs (half angle) and trig limit rules (lim of sinx/x = 1). I know it's a pain, but that's the game! Thanks for all the help!
$endgroup$
– Sawyer Benson
11 hours ago










4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes


















17












$begingroup$

Let's use $a^3-b^3=(a-b)(a^2+ab+b^2)$ for $a=sqrt[3]{sin 2(x+h)}$ and $b=sqrt[3]{sin 2x}$. Assume that $bneq 0$. This implies that $a^2+ab+b^2neq 0$ and we can divide:



$$frac{sqrt[3]{sin (2x+2h)} - sqrt[3]{sin 2x}}{h} = frac{sin (2x+2h) - sin 2x}{h} cdot frac{1}{a^2+ab+b^2}$$



Now using the identity $sin2(x+h)-sin 2x = 2sin h cos (2x+h)$, continuity of $sin$ and $cos$ and
$$lim_{~hto 0}frac{sin h}{h}=1$$



we get that the derivative is:



$$frac{2cos 2x}{3sin^{2/3} 2x}$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Shouldn't you have $h$ rather than $2h$ in the denominator, and $sin h$ rather than $sin(2h)$ in the numerator?
    $endgroup$
    – Calum Gilhooley
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @CalumGilhooley - you're right, this is how usually this is written. However, if you choose $2h$ convention, you get $cos (2x+h)$ instead of $cos (2x+h/2)$, what looks nicer to me.
    $endgroup$
    – Paweł Czyż
    10 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    The error is in the claimed identity $sin2(x+h)-sin 2x = 2sin 2h cos (2x+h)$. The $2h$ there should be $h$ (unless I've gone mad, which is always a possibility).
    $endgroup$
    – Calum Gilhooley
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oh, I see! It's a terrible mistake of mine, thanks for pointing this out!
    $endgroup$
    – Paweł Czyż
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    nice approach !(+1)
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    10 hours ago



















7












$begingroup$

I have written down all steps in detail, and I have marked the main ingredients using bold face font. This is also a nice typing exercise in Latex.



Let $pgt0$ and consider more generally the difference quotient



$$d= frac{1}{h} left(sin(2x+2h)^p - sin(2x)^p right)$$



Now for the sine of the sum we can write



$$sin(2x+2h)= sin(2x)cos(2h)+cos(2x)sin(2h) \= cos(2h)sin(2x) (1+cot(2x) tan(2h))$$



Next for $hto 0$ we have approximately



$$cos(2h)= 1- 2h^2 + O(h^4)$$
$$tan(2h) = 2h + O(h^3)$$



so that, keeping only the first order in $h$, we get for the $p$-th power



$$sin(2x+2h)^p = sin(2x)^p(1+cot(2x)2h)^p\simeq sin(2x)^p+2 h p sin(2x)^pcot(2x)\=sin(2x)^p+2 h p sin(2x)^{p-1}cos(2x)$$



where we have use the binomial formula $(1+epsilon)^p simeq 1 + p; epsilon $.



Finally we get for $hto 0$



$$d = frac{1}{h} (sin(2x)^p+2 h p sin(2x)^{p-1}cos(2x) - sin(2x)^p) \= frac{1}{h} 2 h p sin(2x)^{p-1}cos(2x)\= 2 p sin(2x)^{p-1}cos(2x)$$



For $p=frac{1}{3}$ this gives



$$d = frac{2}{3}sin(2x)^{-frac{2}{3}}cos(2x)$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Can you also find the integral: $int_0^{frac{pi }{2}} sqrt[3]{sin (2 x)} , dx$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Wolfgang Hintze
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    ...( by parts )
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your use of the Maclaurin expansion seems to sidestep the requirement to only rely on the difference quotient !
    $endgroup$
    – Jim
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @ Jim What would you propose instead? At a certain point you need to use this expansion in one form or other. Notice that all answer here use the same expansion, mostly even shorter, only as a limit.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Wolfgang Hintze
    4 hours ago





















3












$begingroup$

Are you allowed to use the trigonometric limit identities of
$$lim limits_{u to 0} frac{sin u}{u} = 1 hspace{.5 in} text{and} hspace{.5 in} lim limits_{u to 0} frac{1-cos u}{u} = 0?$$
If not, the link above gives good hints. You'll need to prove these first. If you are allowed to use them, then let's proceed. The first step is to use some algebra to get rid of those pesky third roots:



begin{align*}
&lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sqrt[3]{sin(2x+2h)} - sqrt[3]{sin(2x)}}{h}\
=& lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sqrt[3]{sin(2x+2h)} - sqrt[3]{sin(2x)}}{h} cdot frac{sin(2x+2h)^{2/3} + sin(2x+2h)^{1/3}sin(2x)^{1/3} + sin(2x)^{2/3}}{sin(2x+2h)^{2/3} + sin(2x+2h)^{1/3}sin(2x)^{1/3} + sin(2x)^{2/3}}\
=&lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sin(2x+2h) - sin(2x)}{h(sin(2x+2h)^{2/3} + sin(2x+2h)^{1/3}sin(2x)^{1/3} + sin(2x)^{2/3})}
end{align*}



That denominator looks a little messy, so maybe we could call the part in parentheses
$$W(x,h) = sin(2x+2h)^{2/3} + sin(2x+2h)^{1/3}sin(2x)^{1/3} + sin(2x)^{2/3}.$$
Notice that $W(x,0) = 3sin(2x)^{2/3}$. That will come in handy later on. Now let's rewrite our limit using our $W$ shorthand and use the angle sum identity to move forward:
begin{align*}
lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sin(2x+2h) - sin(2x)}{h cdot W(x,h)} &= lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sin(2x)cos(2h) - cos(2h)sin(2x) - sin(2x)}{h cdot W(x,h)}\
&= lim limits_{h to 0} frac{cos(2h)-1}{h} cdot frac{sin(2x)}{W(x,h)} + limlimits_{h to 0} frac{-sin(2h)}{h} cdot frac{cos(2x)}{W(x,h)}\
&= lim limits_{h to 0} frac{1-cos(2h)}{2h} cdot frac{-2sin(2x)}{W(x,h)} + limlimits_{h to 0} frac{sin(2h)}{2h} cdot frac{-2cos(2x)}{W(x,h)}
end{align*}

Then, by the identities mentioned above, we have
begin{align*}
lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sqrt[3]{sin(2x+2h)} - sqrt[3]{sin(2x)}}{h} &= 0 cdot frac{-2sin(2x)}{W(x,0)} + 1 cdot frac{-2cos(2x)}{W(x,0)}\
&= frac{-2cos(2x)}{3sin(2x)^{2/3}}
end{align*}

which is the answer you're looking for.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks Ryan. I’m not seeing the intuition of how the numerator is clearing to it’s simplified form. Are you distrubting?
    $endgroup$
    – Sawyer Benson
    1 hour ago



















2












$begingroup$

Hint:



Use symmetry! :
$$sin(2x+2h)=sin((2x+h)+h) quad sin(2x)=sin((2x+h)-h)$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This is a good idea !
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Wolfgang Hintze
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Dr.WolfgangHintze: oh yes, to me, symmetry is the core of maths
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    10 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});






Sawyer Benson is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3112718%2fcomputation-of-the-derivative-of-a-certain-cubic-root-function-using-only-the-de%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes








4 Answers
4






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









17












$begingroup$

Let's use $a^3-b^3=(a-b)(a^2+ab+b^2)$ for $a=sqrt[3]{sin 2(x+h)}$ and $b=sqrt[3]{sin 2x}$. Assume that $bneq 0$. This implies that $a^2+ab+b^2neq 0$ and we can divide:



$$frac{sqrt[3]{sin (2x+2h)} - sqrt[3]{sin 2x}}{h} = frac{sin (2x+2h) - sin 2x}{h} cdot frac{1}{a^2+ab+b^2}$$



Now using the identity $sin2(x+h)-sin 2x = 2sin h cos (2x+h)$, continuity of $sin$ and $cos$ and
$$lim_{~hto 0}frac{sin h}{h}=1$$



we get that the derivative is:



$$frac{2cos 2x}{3sin^{2/3} 2x}$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Shouldn't you have $h$ rather than $2h$ in the denominator, and $sin h$ rather than $sin(2h)$ in the numerator?
    $endgroup$
    – Calum Gilhooley
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @CalumGilhooley - you're right, this is how usually this is written. However, if you choose $2h$ convention, you get $cos (2x+h)$ instead of $cos (2x+h/2)$, what looks nicer to me.
    $endgroup$
    – Paweł Czyż
    10 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    The error is in the claimed identity $sin2(x+h)-sin 2x = 2sin 2h cos (2x+h)$. The $2h$ there should be $h$ (unless I've gone mad, which is always a possibility).
    $endgroup$
    – Calum Gilhooley
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oh, I see! It's a terrible mistake of mine, thanks for pointing this out!
    $endgroup$
    – Paweł Czyż
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    nice approach !(+1)
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    10 hours ago
















17












$begingroup$

Let's use $a^3-b^3=(a-b)(a^2+ab+b^2)$ for $a=sqrt[3]{sin 2(x+h)}$ and $b=sqrt[3]{sin 2x}$. Assume that $bneq 0$. This implies that $a^2+ab+b^2neq 0$ and we can divide:



$$frac{sqrt[3]{sin (2x+2h)} - sqrt[3]{sin 2x}}{h} = frac{sin (2x+2h) - sin 2x}{h} cdot frac{1}{a^2+ab+b^2}$$



Now using the identity $sin2(x+h)-sin 2x = 2sin h cos (2x+h)$, continuity of $sin$ and $cos$ and
$$lim_{~hto 0}frac{sin h}{h}=1$$



we get that the derivative is:



$$frac{2cos 2x}{3sin^{2/3} 2x}$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Shouldn't you have $h$ rather than $2h$ in the denominator, and $sin h$ rather than $sin(2h)$ in the numerator?
    $endgroup$
    – Calum Gilhooley
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @CalumGilhooley - you're right, this is how usually this is written. However, if you choose $2h$ convention, you get $cos (2x+h)$ instead of $cos (2x+h/2)$, what looks nicer to me.
    $endgroup$
    – Paweł Czyż
    10 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    The error is in the claimed identity $sin2(x+h)-sin 2x = 2sin 2h cos (2x+h)$. The $2h$ there should be $h$ (unless I've gone mad, which is always a possibility).
    $endgroup$
    – Calum Gilhooley
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oh, I see! It's a terrible mistake of mine, thanks for pointing this out!
    $endgroup$
    – Paweł Czyż
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    nice approach !(+1)
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    10 hours ago














17












17








17





$begingroup$

Let's use $a^3-b^3=(a-b)(a^2+ab+b^2)$ for $a=sqrt[3]{sin 2(x+h)}$ and $b=sqrt[3]{sin 2x}$. Assume that $bneq 0$. This implies that $a^2+ab+b^2neq 0$ and we can divide:



$$frac{sqrt[3]{sin (2x+2h)} - sqrt[3]{sin 2x}}{h} = frac{sin (2x+2h) - sin 2x}{h} cdot frac{1}{a^2+ab+b^2}$$



Now using the identity $sin2(x+h)-sin 2x = 2sin h cos (2x+h)$, continuity of $sin$ and $cos$ and
$$lim_{~hto 0}frac{sin h}{h}=1$$



we get that the derivative is:



$$frac{2cos 2x}{3sin^{2/3} 2x}$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Let's use $a^3-b^3=(a-b)(a^2+ab+b^2)$ for $a=sqrt[3]{sin 2(x+h)}$ and $b=sqrt[3]{sin 2x}$. Assume that $bneq 0$. This implies that $a^2+ab+b^2neq 0$ and we can divide:



$$frac{sqrt[3]{sin (2x+2h)} - sqrt[3]{sin 2x}}{h} = frac{sin (2x+2h) - sin 2x}{h} cdot frac{1}{a^2+ab+b^2}$$



Now using the identity $sin2(x+h)-sin 2x = 2sin h cos (2x+h)$, continuity of $sin$ and $cos$ and
$$lim_{~hto 0}frac{sin h}{h}=1$$



we get that the derivative is:



$$frac{2cos 2x}{3sin^{2/3} 2x}$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 10 hours ago

























answered 10 hours ago









Paweł CzyżPaweł Czyż

76711




76711












  • $begingroup$
    Shouldn't you have $h$ rather than $2h$ in the denominator, and $sin h$ rather than $sin(2h)$ in the numerator?
    $endgroup$
    – Calum Gilhooley
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @CalumGilhooley - you're right, this is how usually this is written. However, if you choose $2h$ convention, you get $cos (2x+h)$ instead of $cos (2x+h/2)$, what looks nicer to me.
    $endgroup$
    – Paweł Czyż
    10 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    The error is in the claimed identity $sin2(x+h)-sin 2x = 2sin 2h cos (2x+h)$. The $2h$ there should be $h$ (unless I've gone mad, which is always a possibility).
    $endgroup$
    – Calum Gilhooley
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oh, I see! It's a terrible mistake of mine, thanks for pointing this out!
    $endgroup$
    – Paweł Czyż
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    nice approach !(+1)
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    10 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Shouldn't you have $h$ rather than $2h$ in the denominator, and $sin h$ rather than $sin(2h)$ in the numerator?
    $endgroup$
    – Calum Gilhooley
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @CalumGilhooley - you're right, this is how usually this is written. However, if you choose $2h$ convention, you get $cos (2x+h)$ instead of $cos (2x+h/2)$, what looks nicer to me.
    $endgroup$
    – Paweł Czyż
    10 hours ago












  • $begingroup$
    The error is in the claimed identity $sin2(x+h)-sin 2x = 2sin 2h cos (2x+h)$. The $2h$ there should be $h$ (unless I've gone mad, which is always a possibility).
    $endgroup$
    – Calum Gilhooley
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Oh, I see! It's a terrible mistake of mine, thanks for pointing this out!
    $endgroup$
    – Paweł Czyż
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    nice approach !(+1)
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    10 hours ago
















$begingroup$
Shouldn't you have $h$ rather than $2h$ in the denominator, and $sin h$ rather than $sin(2h)$ in the numerator?
$endgroup$
– Calum Gilhooley
10 hours ago




$begingroup$
Shouldn't you have $h$ rather than $2h$ in the denominator, and $sin h$ rather than $sin(2h)$ in the numerator?
$endgroup$
– Calum Gilhooley
10 hours ago












$begingroup$
@CalumGilhooley - you're right, this is how usually this is written. However, if you choose $2h$ convention, you get $cos (2x+h)$ instead of $cos (2x+h/2)$, what looks nicer to me.
$endgroup$
– Paweł Czyż
10 hours ago






$begingroup$
@CalumGilhooley - you're right, this is how usually this is written. However, if you choose $2h$ convention, you get $cos (2x+h)$ instead of $cos (2x+h/2)$, what looks nicer to me.
$endgroup$
– Paweł Czyż
10 hours ago














$begingroup$
The error is in the claimed identity $sin2(x+h)-sin 2x = 2sin 2h cos (2x+h)$. The $2h$ there should be $h$ (unless I've gone mad, which is always a possibility).
$endgroup$
– Calum Gilhooley
10 hours ago




$begingroup$
The error is in the claimed identity $sin2(x+h)-sin 2x = 2sin 2h cos (2x+h)$. The $2h$ there should be $h$ (unless I've gone mad, which is always a possibility).
$endgroup$
– Calum Gilhooley
10 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Oh, I see! It's a terrible mistake of mine, thanks for pointing this out!
$endgroup$
– Paweł Czyż
10 hours ago




$begingroup$
Oh, I see! It's a terrible mistake of mine, thanks for pointing this out!
$endgroup$
– Paweł Czyż
10 hours ago












$begingroup$
nice approach !(+1)
$endgroup$
– G Cab
10 hours ago




$begingroup$
nice approach !(+1)
$endgroup$
– G Cab
10 hours ago











7












$begingroup$

I have written down all steps in detail, and I have marked the main ingredients using bold face font. This is also a nice typing exercise in Latex.



Let $pgt0$ and consider more generally the difference quotient



$$d= frac{1}{h} left(sin(2x+2h)^p - sin(2x)^p right)$$



Now for the sine of the sum we can write



$$sin(2x+2h)= sin(2x)cos(2h)+cos(2x)sin(2h) \= cos(2h)sin(2x) (1+cot(2x) tan(2h))$$



Next for $hto 0$ we have approximately



$$cos(2h)= 1- 2h^2 + O(h^4)$$
$$tan(2h) = 2h + O(h^3)$$



so that, keeping only the first order in $h$, we get for the $p$-th power



$$sin(2x+2h)^p = sin(2x)^p(1+cot(2x)2h)^p\simeq sin(2x)^p+2 h p sin(2x)^pcot(2x)\=sin(2x)^p+2 h p sin(2x)^{p-1}cos(2x)$$



where we have use the binomial formula $(1+epsilon)^p simeq 1 + p; epsilon $.



Finally we get for $hto 0$



$$d = frac{1}{h} (sin(2x)^p+2 h p sin(2x)^{p-1}cos(2x) - sin(2x)^p) \= frac{1}{h} 2 h p sin(2x)^{p-1}cos(2x)\= 2 p sin(2x)^{p-1}cos(2x)$$



For $p=frac{1}{3}$ this gives



$$d = frac{2}{3}sin(2x)^{-frac{2}{3}}cos(2x)$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Can you also find the integral: $int_0^{frac{pi }{2}} sqrt[3]{sin (2 x)} , dx$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Wolfgang Hintze
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    ...( by parts )
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your use of the Maclaurin expansion seems to sidestep the requirement to only rely on the difference quotient !
    $endgroup$
    – Jim
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @ Jim What would you propose instead? At a certain point you need to use this expansion in one form or other. Notice that all answer here use the same expansion, mostly even shorter, only as a limit.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Wolfgang Hintze
    4 hours ago


















7












$begingroup$

I have written down all steps in detail, and I have marked the main ingredients using bold face font. This is also a nice typing exercise in Latex.



Let $pgt0$ and consider more generally the difference quotient



$$d= frac{1}{h} left(sin(2x+2h)^p - sin(2x)^p right)$$



Now for the sine of the sum we can write



$$sin(2x+2h)= sin(2x)cos(2h)+cos(2x)sin(2h) \= cos(2h)sin(2x) (1+cot(2x) tan(2h))$$



Next for $hto 0$ we have approximately



$$cos(2h)= 1- 2h^2 + O(h^4)$$
$$tan(2h) = 2h + O(h^3)$$



so that, keeping only the first order in $h$, we get for the $p$-th power



$$sin(2x+2h)^p = sin(2x)^p(1+cot(2x)2h)^p\simeq sin(2x)^p+2 h p sin(2x)^pcot(2x)\=sin(2x)^p+2 h p sin(2x)^{p-1}cos(2x)$$



where we have use the binomial formula $(1+epsilon)^p simeq 1 + p; epsilon $.



Finally we get for $hto 0$



$$d = frac{1}{h} (sin(2x)^p+2 h p sin(2x)^{p-1}cos(2x) - sin(2x)^p) \= frac{1}{h} 2 h p sin(2x)^{p-1}cos(2x)\= 2 p sin(2x)^{p-1}cos(2x)$$



For $p=frac{1}{3}$ this gives



$$d = frac{2}{3}sin(2x)^{-frac{2}{3}}cos(2x)$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Can you also find the integral: $int_0^{frac{pi }{2}} sqrt[3]{sin (2 x)} , dx$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Wolfgang Hintze
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    ...( by parts )
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your use of the Maclaurin expansion seems to sidestep the requirement to only rely on the difference quotient !
    $endgroup$
    – Jim
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @ Jim What would you propose instead? At a certain point you need to use this expansion in one form or other. Notice that all answer here use the same expansion, mostly even shorter, only as a limit.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Wolfgang Hintze
    4 hours ago
















7












7








7





$begingroup$

I have written down all steps in detail, and I have marked the main ingredients using bold face font. This is also a nice typing exercise in Latex.



Let $pgt0$ and consider more generally the difference quotient



$$d= frac{1}{h} left(sin(2x+2h)^p - sin(2x)^p right)$$



Now for the sine of the sum we can write



$$sin(2x+2h)= sin(2x)cos(2h)+cos(2x)sin(2h) \= cos(2h)sin(2x) (1+cot(2x) tan(2h))$$



Next for $hto 0$ we have approximately



$$cos(2h)= 1- 2h^2 + O(h^4)$$
$$tan(2h) = 2h + O(h^3)$$



so that, keeping only the first order in $h$, we get for the $p$-th power



$$sin(2x+2h)^p = sin(2x)^p(1+cot(2x)2h)^p\simeq sin(2x)^p+2 h p sin(2x)^pcot(2x)\=sin(2x)^p+2 h p sin(2x)^{p-1}cos(2x)$$



where we have use the binomial formula $(1+epsilon)^p simeq 1 + p; epsilon $.



Finally we get for $hto 0$



$$d = frac{1}{h} (sin(2x)^p+2 h p sin(2x)^{p-1}cos(2x) - sin(2x)^p) \= frac{1}{h} 2 h p sin(2x)^{p-1}cos(2x)\= 2 p sin(2x)^{p-1}cos(2x)$$



For $p=frac{1}{3}$ this gives



$$d = frac{2}{3}sin(2x)^{-frac{2}{3}}cos(2x)$$






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



I have written down all steps in detail, and I have marked the main ingredients using bold face font. This is also a nice typing exercise in Latex.



Let $pgt0$ and consider more generally the difference quotient



$$d= frac{1}{h} left(sin(2x+2h)^p - sin(2x)^p right)$$



Now for the sine of the sum we can write



$$sin(2x+2h)= sin(2x)cos(2h)+cos(2x)sin(2h) \= cos(2h)sin(2x) (1+cot(2x) tan(2h))$$



Next for $hto 0$ we have approximately



$$cos(2h)= 1- 2h^2 + O(h^4)$$
$$tan(2h) = 2h + O(h^3)$$



so that, keeping only the first order in $h$, we get for the $p$-th power



$$sin(2x+2h)^p = sin(2x)^p(1+cot(2x)2h)^p\simeq sin(2x)^p+2 h p sin(2x)^pcot(2x)\=sin(2x)^p+2 h p sin(2x)^{p-1}cos(2x)$$



where we have use the binomial formula $(1+epsilon)^p simeq 1 + p; epsilon $.



Finally we get for $hto 0$



$$d = frac{1}{h} (sin(2x)^p+2 h p sin(2x)^{p-1}cos(2x) - sin(2x)^p) \= frac{1}{h} 2 h p sin(2x)^{p-1}cos(2x)\= 2 p sin(2x)^{p-1}cos(2x)$$



For $p=frac{1}{3}$ this gives



$$d = frac{2}{3}sin(2x)^{-frac{2}{3}}cos(2x)$$







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 10 hours ago

























answered 10 hours ago









Dr. Wolfgang HintzeDr. Wolfgang Hintze

3,505618




3,505618












  • $begingroup$
    Can you also find the integral: $int_0^{frac{pi }{2}} sqrt[3]{sin (2 x)} , dx$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Wolfgang Hintze
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    ...( by parts )
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your use of the Maclaurin expansion seems to sidestep the requirement to only rely on the difference quotient !
    $endgroup$
    – Jim
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @ Jim What would you propose instead? At a certain point you need to use this expansion in one form or other. Notice that all answer here use the same expansion, mostly even shorter, only as a limit.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Wolfgang Hintze
    4 hours ago




















  • $begingroup$
    Can you also find the integral: $int_0^{frac{pi }{2}} sqrt[3]{sin (2 x)} , dx$ ?
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Wolfgang Hintze
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    ...( by parts )
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    10 hours ago






  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Your use of the Maclaurin expansion seems to sidestep the requirement to only rely on the difference quotient !
    $endgroup$
    – Jim
    5 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @ Jim What would you propose instead? At a certain point you need to use this expansion in one form or other. Notice that all answer here use the same expansion, mostly even shorter, only as a limit.
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Wolfgang Hintze
    4 hours ago


















$begingroup$
Can you also find the integral: $int_0^{frac{pi }{2}} sqrt[3]{sin (2 x)} , dx$ ?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Wolfgang Hintze
10 hours ago




$begingroup$
Can you also find the integral: $int_0^{frac{pi }{2}} sqrt[3]{sin (2 x)} , dx$ ?
$endgroup$
– Dr. Wolfgang Hintze
10 hours ago












$begingroup$
...( by parts )
$endgroup$
– G Cab
10 hours ago




$begingroup$
...( by parts )
$endgroup$
– G Cab
10 hours ago




1




1




$begingroup$
Your use of the Maclaurin expansion seems to sidestep the requirement to only rely on the difference quotient !
$endgroup$
– Jim
5 hours ago




$begingroup$
Your use of the Maclaurin expansion seems to sidestep the requirement to only rely on the difference quotient !
$endgroup$
– Jim
5 hours ago












$begingroup$
@ Jim What would you propose instead? At a certain point you need to use this expansion in one form or other. Notice that all answer here use the same expansion, mostly even shorter, only as a limit.
$endgroup$
– Dr. Wolfgang Hintze
4 hours ago






$begingroup$
@ Jim What would you propose instead? At a certain point you need to use this expansion in one form or other. Notice that all answer here use the same expansion, mostly even shorter, only as a limit.
$endgroup$
– Dr. Wolfgang Hintze
4 hours ago













3












$begingroup$

Are you allowed to use the trigonometric limit identities of
$$lim limits_{u to 0} frac{sin u}{u} = 1 hspace{.5 in} text{and} hspace{.5 in} lim limits_{u to 0} frac{1-cos u}{u} = 0?$$
If not, the link above gives good hints. You'll need to prove these first. If you are allowed to use them, then let's proceed. The first step is to use some algebra to get rid of those pesky third roots:



begin{align*}
&lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sqrt[3]{sin(2x+2h)} - sqrt[3]{sin(2x)}}{h}\
=& lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sqrt[3]{sin(2x+2h)} - sqrt[3]{sin(2x)}}{h} cdot frac{sin(2x+2h)^{2/3} + sin(2x+2h)^{1/3}sin(2x)^{1/3} + sin(2x)^{2/3}}{sin(2x+2h)^{2/3} + sin(2x+2h)^{1/3}sin(2x)^{1/3} + sin(2x)^{2/3}}\
=&lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sin(2x+2h) - sin(2x)}{h(sin(2x+2h)^{2/3} + sin(2x+2h)^{1/3}sin(2x)^{1/3} + sin(2x)^{2/3})}
end{align*}



That denominator looks a little messy, so maybe we could call the part in parentheses
$$W(x,h) = sin(2x+2h)^{2/3} + sin(2x+2h)^{1/3}sin(2x)^{1/3} + sin(2x)^{2/3}.$$
Notice that $W(x,0) = 3sin(2x)^{2/3}$. That will come in handy later on. Now let's rewrite our limit using our $W$ shorthand and use the angle sum identity to move forward:
begin{align*}
lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sin(2x+2h) - sin(2x)}{h cdot W(x,h)} &= lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sin(2x)cos(2h) - cos(2h)sin(2x) - sin(2x)}{h cdot W(x,h)}\
&= lim limits_{h to 0} frac{cos(2h)-1}{h} cdot frac{sin(2x)}{W(x,h)} + limlimits_{h to 0} frac{-sin(2h)}{h} cdot frac{cos(2x)}{W(x,h)}\
&= lim limits_{h to 0} frac{1-cos(2h)}{2h} cdot frac{-2sin(2x)}{W(x,h)} + limlimits_{h to 0} frac{sin(2h)}{2h} cdot frac{-2cos(2x)}{W(x,h)}
end{align*}

Then, by the identities mentioned above, we have
begin{align*}
lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sqrt[3]{sin(2x+2h)} - sqrt[3]{sin(2x)}}{h} &= 0 cdot frac{-2sin(2x)}{W(x,0)} + 1 cdot frac{-2cos(2x)}{W(x,0)}\
&= frac{-2cos(2x)}{3sin(2x)^{2/3}}
end{align*}

which is the answer you're looking for.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks Ryan. I’m not seeing the intuition of how the numerator is clearing to it’s simplified form. Are you distrubting?
    $endgroup$
    – Sawyer Benson
    1 hour ago
















3












$begingroup$

Are you allowed to use the trigonometric limit identities of
$$lim limits_{u to 0} frac{sin u}{u} = 1 hspace{.5 in} text{and} hspace{.5 in} lim limits_{u to 0} frac{1-cos u}{u} = 0?$$
If not, the link above gives good hints. You'll need to prove these first. If you are allowed to use them, then let's proceed. The first step is to use some algebra to get rid of those pesky third roots:



begin{align*}
&lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sqrt[3]{sin(2x+2h)} - sqrt[3]{sin(2x)}}{h}\
=& lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sqrt[3]{sin(2x+2h)} - sqrt[3]{sin(2x)}}{h} cdot frac{sin(2x+2h)^{2/3} + sin(2x+2h)^{1/3}sin(2x)^{1/3} + sin(2x)^{2/3}}{sin(2x+2h)^{2/3} + sin(2x+2h)^{1/3}sin(2x)^{1/3} + sin(2x)^{2/3}}\
=&lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sin(2x+2h) - sin(2x)}{h(sin(2x+2h)^{2/3} + sin(2x+2h)^{1/3}sin(2x)^{1/3} + sin(2x)^{2/3})}
end{align*}



That denominator looks a little messy, so maybe we could call the part in parentheses
$$W(x,h) = sin(2x+2h)^{2/3} + sin(2x+2h)^{1/3}sin(2x)^{1/3} + sin(2x)^{2/3}.$$
Notice that $W(x,0) = 3sin(2x)^{2/3}$. That will come in handy later on. Now let's rewrite our limit using our $W$ shorthand and use the angle sum identity to move forward:
begin{align*}
lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sin(2x+2h) - sin(2x)}{h cdot W(x,h)} &= lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sin(2x)cos(2h) - cos(2h)sin(2x) - sin(2x)}{h cdot W(x,h)}\
&= lim limits_{h to 0} frac{cos(2h)-1}{h} cdot frac{sin(2x)}{W(x,h)} + limlimits_{h to 0} frac{-sin(2h)}{h} cdot frac{cos(2x)}{W(x,h)}\
&= lim limits_{h to 0} frac{1-cos(2h)}{2h} cdot frac{-2sin(2x)}{W(x,h)} + limlimits_{h to 0} frac{sin(2h)}{2h} cdot frac{-2cos(2x)}{W(x,h)}
end{align*}

Then, by the identities mentioned above, we have
begin{align*}
lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sqrt[3]{sin(2x+2h)} - sqrt[3]{sin(2x)}}{h} &= 0 cdot frac{-2sin(2x)}{W(x,0)} + 1 cdot frac{-2cos(2x)}{W(x,0)}\
&= frac{-2cos(2x)}{3sin(2x)^{2/3}}
end{align*}

which is the answer you're looking for.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    Thanks Ryan. I’m not seeing the intuition of how the numerator is clearing to it’s simplified form. Are you distrubting?
    $endgroup$
    – Sawyer Benson
    1 hour ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$

Are you allowed to use the trigonometric limit identities of
$$lim limits_{u to 0} frac{sin u}{u} = 1 hspace{.5 in} text{and} hspace{.5 in} lim limits_{u to 0} frac{1-cos u}{u} = 0?$$
If not, the link above gives good hints. You'll need to prove these first. If you are allowed to use them, then let's proceed. The first step is to use some algebra to get rid of those pesky third roots:



begin{align*}
&lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sqrt[3]{sin(2x+2h)} - sqrt[3]{sin(2x)}}{h}\
=& lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sqrt[3]{sin(2x+2h)} - sqrt[3]{sin(2x)}}{h} cdot frac{sin(2x+2h)^{2/3} + sin(2x+2h)^{1/3}sin(2x)^{1/3} + sin(2x)^{2/3}}{sin(2x+2h)^{2/3} + sin(2x+2h)^{1/3}sin(2x)^{1/3} + sin(2x)^{2/3}}\
=&lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sin(2x+2h) - sin(2x)}{h(sin(2x+2h)^{2/3} + sin(2x+2h)^{1/3}sin(2x)^{1/3} + sin(2x)^{2/3})}
end{align*}



That denominator looks a little messy, so maybe we could call the part in parentheses
$$W(x,h) = sin(2x+2h)^{2/3} + sin(2x+2h)^{1/3}sin(2x)^{1/3} + sin(2x)^{2/3}.$$
Notice that $W(x,0) = 3sin(2x)^{2/3}$. That will come in handy later on. Now let's rewrite our limit using our $W$ shorthand and use the angle sum identity to move forward:
begin{align*}
lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sin(2x+2h) - sin(2x)}{h cdot W(x,h)} &= lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sin(2x)cos(2h) - cos(2h)sin(2x) - sin(2x)}{h cdot W(x,h)}\
&= lim limits_{h to 0} frac{cos(2h)-1}{h} cdot frac{sin(2x)}{W(x,h)} + limlimits_{h to 0} frac{-sin(2h)}{h} cdot frac{cos(2x)}{W(x,h)}\
&= lim limits_{h to 0} frac{1-cos(2h)}{2h} cdot frac{-2sin(2x)}{W(x,h)} + limlimits_{h to 0} frac{sin(2h)}{2h} cdot frac{-2cos(2x)}{W(x,h)}
end{align*}

Then, by the identities mentioned above, we have
begin{align*}
lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sqrt[3]{sin(2x+2h)} - sqrt[3]{sin(2x)}}{h} &= 0 cdot frac{-2sin(2x)}{W(x,0)} + 1 cdot frac{-2cos(2x)}{W(x,0)}\
&= frac{-2cos(2x)}{3sin(2x)^{2/3}}
end{align*}

which is the answer you're looking for.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Are you allowed to use the trigonometric limit identities of
$$lim limits_{u to 0} frac{sin u}{u} = 1 hspace{.5 in} text{and} hspace{.5 in} lim limits_{u to 0} frac{1-cos u}{u} = 0?$$
If not, the link above gives good hints. You'll need to prove these first. If you are allowed to use them, then let's proceed. The first step is to use some algebra to get rid of those pesky third roots:



begin{align*}
&lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sqrt[3]{sin(2x+2h)} - sqrt[3]{sin(2x)}}{h}\
=& lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sqrt[3]{sin(2x+2h)} - sqrt[3]{sin(2x)}}{h} cdot frac{sin(2x+2h)^{2/3} + sin(2x+2h)^{1/3}sin(2x)^{1/3} + sin(2x)^{2/3}}{sin(2x+2h)^{2/3} + sin(2x+2h)^{1/3}sin(2x)^{1/3} + sin(2x)^{2/3}}\
=&lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sin(2x+2h) - sin(2x)}{h(sin(2x+2h)^{2/3} + sin(2x+2h)^{1/3}sin(2x)^{1/3} + sin(2x)^{2/3})}
end{align*}



That denominator looks a little messy, so maybe we could call the part in parentheses
$$W(x,h) = sin(2x+2h)^{2/3} + sin(2x+2h)^{1/3}sin(2x)^{1/3} + sin(2x)^{2/3}.$$
Notice that $W(x,0) = 3sin(2x)^{2/3}$. That will come in handy later on. Now let's rewrite our limit using our $W$ shorthand and use the angle sum identity to move forward:
begin{align*}
lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sin(2x+2h) - sin(2x)}{h cdot W(x,h)} &= lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sin(2x)cos(2h) - cos(2h)sin(2x) - sin(2x)}{h cdot W(x,h)}\
&= lim limits_{h to 0} frac{cos(2h)-1}{h} cdot frac{sin(2x)}{W(x,h)} + limlimits_{h to 0} frac{-sin(2h)}{h} cdot frac{cos(2x)}{W(x,h)}\
&= lim limits_{h to 0} frac{1-cos(2h)}{2h} cdot frac{-2sin(2x)}{W(x,h)} + limlimits_{h to 0} frac{sin(2h)}{2h} cdot frac{-2cos(2x)}{W(x,h)}
end{align*}

Then, by the identities mentioned above, we have
begin{align*}
lim limits_{h to 0} frac{sqrt[3]{sin(2x+2h)} - sqrt[3]{sin(2x)}}{h} &= 0 cdot frac{-2sin(2x)}{W(x,0)} + 1 cdot frac{-2cos(2x)}{W(x,0)}\
&= frac{-2cos(2x)}{3sin(2x)^{2/3}}
end{align*}

which is the answer you're looking for.







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 10 hours ago









Ryan T JohnsonRyan T Johnson

1214




1214












  • $begingroup$
    Thanks Ryan. I’m not seeing the intuition of how the numerator is clearing to it’s simplified form. Are you distrubting?
    $endgroup$
    – Sawyer Benson
    1 hour ago


















  • $begingroup$
    Thanks Ryan. I’m not seeing the intuition of how the numerator is clearing to it’s simplified form. Are you distrubting?
    $endgroup$
    – Sawyer Benson
    1 hour ago
















$begingroup$
Thanks Ryan. I’m not seeing the intuition of how the numerator is clearing to it’s simplified form. Are you distrubting?
$endgroup$
– Sawyer Benson
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Thanks Ryan. I’m not seeing the intuition of how the numerator is clearing to it’s simplified form. Are you distrubting?
$endgroup$
– Sawyer Benson
1 hour ago











2












$begingroup$

Hint:



Use symmetry! :
$$sin(2x+2h)=sin((2x+h)+h) quad sin(2x)=sin((2x+h)-h)$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This is a good idea !
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Wolfgang Hintze
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Dr.WolfgangHintze: oh yes, to me, symmetry is the core of maths
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    10 hours ago
















2












$begingroup$

Hint:



Use symmetry! :
$$sin(2x+2h)=sin((2x+h)+h) quad sin(2x)=sin((2x+h)-h)$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    This is a good idea !
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Wolfgang Hintze
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Dr.WolfgangHintze: oh yes, to me, symmetry is the core of maths
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    10 hours ago














2












2








2





$begingroup$

Hint:



Use symmetry! :
$$sin(2x+2h)=sin((2x+h)+h) quad sin(2x)=sin((2x+h)-h)$$






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$



Hint:



Use symmetry! :
$$sin(2x+2h)=sin((2x+h)+h) quad sin(2x)=sin((2x+h)-h)$$







share|cite|improve this answer












share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer










answered 10 hours ago









G CabG Cab

19.5k31238




19.5k31238












  • $begingroup$
    This is a good idea !
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Wolfgang Hintze
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Dr.WolfgangHintze: oh yes, to me, symmetry is the core of maths
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    10 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    This is a good idea !
    $endgroup$
    – Dr. Wolfgang Hintze
    10 hours ago










  • $begingroup$
    @Dr.WolfgangHintze: oh yes, to me, symmetry is the core of maths
    $endgroup$
    – G Cab
    10 hours ago
















$begingroup$
This is a good idea !
$endgroup$
– Dr. Wolfgang Hintze
10 hours ago




$begingroup$
This is a good idea !
$endgroup$
– Dr. Wolfgang Hintze
10 hours ago












$begingroup$
@Dr.WolfgangHintze: oh yes, to me, symmetry is the core of maths
$endgroup$
– G Cab
10 hours ago




$begingroup$
@Dr.WolfgangHintze: oh yes, to me, symmetry is the core of maths
$endgroup$
– G Cab
10 hours ago










Sawyer Benson is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










draft saved

draft discarded


















Sawyer Benson is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













Sawyer Benson is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












Sawyer Benson is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3112718%2fcomputation-of-the-derivative-of-a-certain-cubic-root-function-using-only-the-de%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

ف. موراي أبراهام

صرب

كأس إنترتوتو