Integral problem. Unsure of the approach.
$begingroup$
I have this integral:
$$int_0^1 frac{1 + 12t}{1 + 3t}dt$$
I can split this up into:
$$int_0^1 frac{1}{1+3t} dt + int_0^1frac{12t}{1+3t}dt$$
The left side:
$u = 1+3t$ and $du = 3dt$ and $frac{du}{3} = dt$
so $$frac{1}{3} int_0^1 frac{1}{u} du = frac{1}{3} ln |u| + C$$
But what about the right?
calculus integration
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have this integral:
$$int_0^1 frac{1 + 12t}{1 + 3t}dt$$
I can split this up into:
$$int_0^1 frac{1}{1+3t} dt + int_0^1frac{12t}{1+3t}dt$$
The left side:
$u = 1+3t$ and $du = 3dt$ and $frac{du}{3} = dt$
so $$frac{1}{3} int_0^1 frac{1}{u} du = frac{1}{3} ln |u| + C$$
But what about the right?
calculus integration
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I have this integral:
$$int_0^1 frac{1 + 12t}{1 + 3t}dt$$
I can split this up into:
$$int_0^1 frac{1}{1+3t} dt + int_0^1frac{12t}{1+3t}dt$$
The left side:
$u = 1+3t$ and $du = 3dt$ and $frac{du}{3} = dt$
so $$frac{1}{3} int_0^1 frac{1}{u} du = frac{1}{3} ln |u| + C$$
But what about the right?
calculus integration
$endgroup$
I have this integral:
$$int_0^1 frac{1 + 12t}{1 + 3t}dt$$
I can split this up into:
$$int_0^1 frac{1}{1+3t} dt + int_0^1frac{12t}{1+3t}dt$$
The left side:
$u = 1+3t$ and $du = 3dt$ and $frac{du}{3} = dt$
so $$frac{1}{3} int_0^1 frac{1}{u} du = frac{1}{3} ln |u| + C$$
But what about the right?
calculus integration
calculus integration
edited 26 mins ago
Eevee Trainer
6,54811237
6,54811237
asked 34 mins ago
Jwan622Jwan622
2,16211530
2,16211530
add a comment |
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint:
$$frac{12t}{1+3t} = 4 - frac{4}{1+3t}.$$ Now use the same approach as you did for the first part.
In fact you should’ve simplified the fraction before splitting into parts.
Remember to evaluate the integral at t=0 and t=1! ;)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
At least on an initial glance, I'd make the substitution
$$u = 1+3t implies du = 3dt implies dt = frac{du}{3}$$
Note that $t = (u-1)/3$ and thus $12t = 4(u-1)$.
Then the integral becomes
$$int_0^1 frac{12t}{1 + 3t} dt = int_ast^ast frac{4(u-1)}{u} frac{dt}{3} = frac 4 3 int_ast^ast frac{u-1}{u}du = frac 4 3 int_ast^ast 1 - frac{1}{u}du$$
But this seems a bit excessive and unnecessary, even if it's the first thing to come to mind. (That's why I left the bounds as $ast$'s: in cases like these, overcomplication suggests an alternative approach.)
Another trick is to "add and subtract the same thing from the top"; this can be handy in a lot of math classes for manipulations if you add and subtract the right thing. In this case, we notice:
$$12t = 12t + 4 - 4 = 4(3t+1) - 4$$
Thus,
$$int_0^1 frac{12t}{1 + 3t} dt = int_0^1 frac{4(3t+1) - 4}{1 + 3t} dt = int_0^1 4 - frac{4}{1 + 3t} dt$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3122196%2fintegral-problem-unsure-of-the-approach%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Hint:
$$frac{12t}{1+3t} = 4 - frac{4}{1+3t}.$$ Now use the same approach as you did for the first part.
In fact you should’ve simplified the fraction before splitting into parts.
Remember to evaluate the integral at t=0 and t=1! ;)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
$$frac{12t}{1+3t} = 4 - frac{4}{1+3t}.$$ Now use the same approach as you did for the first part.
In fact you should’ve simplified the fraction before splitting into parts.
Remember to evaluate the integral at t=0 and t=1! ;)
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Hint:
$$frac{12t}{1+3t} = 4 - frac{4}{1+3t}.$$ Now use the same approach as you did for the first part.
In fact you should’ve simplified the fraction before splitting into parts.
Remember to evaluate the integral at t=0 and t=1! ;)
$endgroup$
Hint:
$$frac{12t}{1+3t} = 4 - frac{4}{1+3t}.$$ Now use the same approach as you did for the first part.
In fact you should’ve simplified the fraction before splitting into parts.
Remember to evaluate the integral at t=0 and t=1! ;)
edited 15 mins ago
Jyrki Lahtonen
109k13169374
109k13169374
answered 31 mins ago
Gareth MaGareth Ma
416213
416213
add a comment |
add a comment |
$begingroup$
At least on an initial glance, I'd make the substitution
$$u = 1+3t implies du = 3dt implies dt = frac{du}{3}$$
Note that $t = (u-1)/3$ and thus $12t = 4(u-1)$.
Then the integral becomes
$$int_0^1 frac{12t}{1 + 3t} dt = int_ast^ast frac{4(u-1)}{u} frac{dt}{3} = frac 4 3 int_ast^ast frac{u-1}{u}du = frac 4 3 int_ast^ast 1 - frac{1}{u}du$$
But this seems a bit excessive and unnecessary, even if it's the first thing to come to mind. (That's why I left the bounds as $ast$'s: in cases like these, overcomplication suggests an alternative approach.)
Another trick is to "add and subtract the same thing from the top"; this can be handy in a lot of math classes for manipulations if you add and subtract the right thing. In this case, we notice:
$$12t = 12t + 4 - 4 = 4(3t+1) - 4$$
Thus,
$$int_0^1 frac{12t}{1 + 3t} dt = int_0^1 frac{4(3t+1) - 4}{1 + 3t} dt = int_0^1 4 - frac{4}{1 + 3t} dt$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
At least on an initial glance, I'd make the substitution
$$u = 1+3t implies du = 3dt implies dt = frac{du}{3}$$
Note that $t = (u-1)/3$ and thus $12t = 4(u-1)$.
Then the integral becomes
$$int_0^1 frac{12t}{1 + 3t} dt = int_ast^ast frac{4(u-1)}{u} frac{dt}{3} = frac 4 3 int_ast^ast frac{u-1}{u}du = frac 4 3 int_ast^ast 1 - frac{1}{u}du$$
But this seems a bit excessive and unnecessary, even if it's the first thing to come to mind. (That's why I left the bounds as $ast$'s: in cases like these, overcomplication suggests an alternative approach.)
Another trick is to "add and subtract the same thing from the top"; this can be handy in a lot of math classes for manipulations if you add and subtract the right thing. In this case, we notice:
$$12t = 12t + 4 - 4 = 4(3t+1) - 4$$
Thus,
$$int_0^1 frac{12t}{1 + 3t} dt = int_0^1 frac{4(3t+1) - 4}{1 + 3t} dt = int_0^1 4 - frac{4}{1 + 3t} dt$$
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
At least on an initial glance, I'd make the substitution
$$u = 1+3t implies du = 3dt implies dt = frac{du}{3}$$
Note that $t = (u-1)/3$ and thus $12t = 4(u-1)$.
Then the integral becomes
$$int_0^1 frac{12t}{1 + 3t} dt = int_ast^ast frac{4(u-1)}{u} frac{dt}{3} = frac 4 3 int_ast^ast frac{u-1}{u}du = frac 4 3 int_ast^ast 1 - frac{1}{u}du$$
But this seems a bit excessive and unnecessary, even if it's the first thing to come to mind. (That's why I left the bounds as $ast$'s: in cases like these, overcomplication suggests an alternative approach.)
Another trick is to "add and subtract the same thing from the top"; this can be handy in a lot of math classes for manipulations if you add and subtract the right thing. In this case, we notice:
$$12t = 12t + 4 - 4 = 4(3t+1) - 4$$
Thus,
$$int_0^1 frac{12t}{1 + 3t} dt = int_0^1 frac{4(3t+1) - 4}{1 + 3t} dt = int_0^1 4 - frac{4}{1 + 3t} dt$$
$endgroup$
At least on an initial glance, I'd make the substitution
$$u = 1+3t implies du = 3dt implies dt = frac{du}{3}$$
Note that $t = (u-1)/3$ and thus $12t = 4(u-1)$.
Then the integral becomes
$$int_0^1 frac{12t}{1 + 3t} dt = int_ast^ast frac{4(u-1)}{u} frac{dt}{3} = frac 4 3 int_ast^ast frac{u-1}{u}du = frac 4 3 int_ast^ast 1 - frac{1}{u}du$$
But this seems a bit excessive and unnecessary, even if it's the first thing to come to mind. (That's why I left the bounds as $ast$'s: in cases like these, overcomplication suggests an alternative approach.)
Another trick is to "add and subtract the same thing from the top"; this can be handy in a lot of math classes for manipulations if you add and subtract the right thing. In this case, we notice:
$$12t = 12t + 4 - 4 = 4(3t+1) - 4$$
Thus,
$$int_0^1 frac{12t}{1 + 3t} dt = int_0^1 frac{4(3t+1) - 4}{1 + 3t} dt = int_0^1 4 - frac{4}{1 + 3t} dt$$
answered 27 mins ago
Eevee TrainerEevee Trainer
6,54811237
6,54811237
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3122196%2fintegral-problem-unsure-of-the-approach%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown