Gauss brackets with double vertical lines












4















I would like to have commands for left- and right gauss brackets which have a double vertical line, but otherwise behave exactly like lfloor and rfloor. In particular, they should come in various sizes and other things should stay unchanged.



I found two candidates, which are both not optimal, unfortunately:




  • llfloor and rrfloor in the package stmaryrd. Unfortunately they do not understand preceeding left and right commands. My impression is they are fixed size.


  • lFloor and rFloor in the package nath. They come in different sizes, but the problem is that including the package nath introduces automatic sizing behaviour of all symbols of parantheses-type. This might be interesting, but for the moment this change is just too radical for my taste.







symbols brackets stmaryrd nath







share|improve this question























  • Please do you have available a MWE for this problem? Thank you.

    – Sebastiano
    6 hours ago













  • tex.stackexchange.com/questions/140055/use-custom-brackets

    – JPi
    4 hours ago
















4















I would like to have commands for left- and right gauss brackets which have a double vertical line, but otherwise behave exactly like lfloor and rfloor. In particular, they should come in various sizes and other things should stay unchanged.



I found two candidates, which are both not optimal, unfortunately:




  • llfloor and rrfloor in the package stmaryrd. Unfortunately they do not understand preceeding left and right commands. My impression is they are fixed size.


  • lFloor and rFloor in the package nath. They come in different sizes, but the problem is that including the package nath introduces automatic sizing behaviour of all symbols of parantheses-type. This might be interesting, but for the moment this change is just too radical for my taste.







symbols brackets stmaryrd nath







share|improve this question























  • Please do you have available a MWE for this problem? Thank you.

    – Sebastiano
    6 hours ago













  • tex.stackexchange.com/questions/140055/use-custom-brackets

    – JPi
    4 hours ago














4












4








4


1






I would like to have commands for left- and right gauss brackets which have a double vertical line, but otherwise behave exactly like lfloor and rfloor. In particular, they should come in various sizes and other things should stay unchanged.



I found two candidates, which are both not optimal, unfortunately:




  • llfloor and rrfloor in the package stmaryrd. Unfortunately they do not understand preceeding left and right commands. My impression is they are fixed size.


  • lFloor and rFloor in the package nath. They come in different sizes, but the problem is that including the package nath introduces automatic sizing behaviour of all symbols of parantheses-type. This might be interesting, but for the moment this change is just too radical for my taste.







symbols brackets stmaryrd nath







share|improve this question














I would like to have commands for left- and right gauss brackets which have a double vertical line, but otherwise behave exactly like lfloor and rfloor. In particular, they should come in various sizes and other things should stay unchanged.



I found two candidates, which are both not optimal, unfortunately:




  • llfloor and rrfloor in the package stmaryrd. Unfortunately they do not understand preceeding left and right commands. My impression is they are fixed size.


  • lFloor and rFloor in the package nath. They come in different sizes, but the problem is that including the package nath introduces automatic sizing behaviour of all symbols of parantheses-type. This might be interesting, but for the moment this change is just too radical for my taste.







symbols brackets stmaryrd nath




symbols brackets stmaryrd nath






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 6 hours ago









azimutazimut

396513




396513













  • Please do you have available a MWE for this problem? Thank you.

    – Sebastiano
    6 hours ago













  • tex.stackexchange.com/questions/140055/use-custom-brackets

    – JPi
    4 hours ago



















  • Please do you have available a MWE for this problem? Thank you.

    – Sebastiano
    6 hours ago













  • tex.stackexchange.com/questions/140055/use-custom-brackets

    – JPi
    4 hours ago

















Please do you have available a MWE for this problem? Thank you.

– Sebastiano
6 hours ago







Please do you have available a MWE for this problem? Thank you.

– Sebastiano
6 hours ago















tex.stackexchange.com/questions/140055/use-custom-brackets

– JPi
4 hours ago





tex.stackexchange.com/questions/140055/use-custom-brackets

– JPi
4 hours ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














Thanks to Werner for providing a solution for this similar question.



A rather quick fix using scalerel would be the following.



Conveniently, scalerel provides scaleleftright[<max width>]{<left obj>}{<stuff>}{<right obj>} (and a comparable stretchleftright) for scaling/stretching both <left obj> and <right obj> to the height of <stuff> (constrained, if required and optional, to a width of <max width>). Here's a quick example:





documentclass{article}

usepackage{scalerel, stmaryrd} % http://ctan.org/pkg/scalerel



newcommand{gaussbracket}[1]{stretchleftright{llfloor}{#1}{rrfloor}}



begin{document}

[ gaussbracket{displaystylesum_{i=1}^n i} ]

end{document}





share|improve this answer





















  • 1





    Very very good. I have really appreciated your code.

    – Sebastiano
    5 hours ago











  • Thanks, but it's not exactly what I wanted. I wanted a pair of commands, one for left and one for right bracket, which can be resized by big, Big, etc. Also, the scaled symbol does not look so good (too thick vertical line).

    – azimut
    3 hours ago





















2














An option if you don't want to use any packages other than amsmath would be to place two lfloors next to each other with a little negative space between:



enter image description here



This has the advantage of not thickening the horizontal portion of the delimiter. 



documentclass{article}

usepackage{amsmath}



newcommand{gaussbr}[1]{%

    leftlfloorhspace{-.33em}leftlfloor #1rightrfloorhspace{-.33em}rightrfloor%

    }



begin{document}



[

gaussbr{A}gaussbr{sum_{n=0}^{infty}a_n}

]



end{document}


Of course, you can adjust the amount of negative space to your liking.






share|improve this answer

























    Your Answer








    StackExchange.ready(function() {
    var channelOptions = {
    tags: "".split(" "),
    id: "85"
    };
    initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

    StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
    // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
    if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
    StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
    createEditor();
    });
    }
    else {
    createEditor();
    }
    });

    function createEditor() {
    StackExchange.prepareEditor({
    heartbeatType: 'answer',
    autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
    convertImagesToLinks: false,
    noModals: true,
    showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
    reputationToPostImages: null,
    bindNavPrevention: true,
    postfix: "",
    imageUploader: {
    brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
    contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
    allowUrls: true
    },
    onDemand: true,
    discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
    ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
    });


    }
    });














    draft saved

    draft discarded


















    StackExchange.ready(
    function () {
    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480159%2fgauss-brackets-with-double-vertical-lines%23new-answer', 'question_page');
    }
    );

    Post as a guest















    Required, but never shown

























    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes








    2 Answers
    2






    active

    oldest

    votes









    active

    oldest

    votes






    active

    oldest

    votes









    3














    Thanks to Werner for providing a solution for this similar question.



    A rather quick fix using scalerel would be the following.



    Conveniently, scalerel provides scaleleftright[<max width>]{<left obj>}{<stuff>}{<right obj>} (and a comparable stretchleftright) for scaling/stretching both <left obj> and <right obj> to the height of <stuff> (constrained, if required and optional, to a width of <max width>). Here's a quick example:





    documentclass{article}
    
usepackage{scalerel, stmaryrd} % http://ctan.org/pkg/scalerel
    

    
newcommand{gaussbracket}[1]{stretchleftright{llfloor}{#1}{rrfloor}}
    

    
begin{document}
    
[ gaussbracket{displaystylesum_{i=1}^n i} ]
    
end{document}





    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      Very very good. I have really appreciated your code.

      – Sebastiano
      5 hours ago











    • Thanks, but it's not exactly what I wanted. I wanted a pair of commands, one for left and one for right bracket, which can be resized by big, Big, etc. Also, the scaled symbol does not look so good (too thick vertical line).

      – azimut
      3 hours ago


















    3














    Thanks to Werner for providing a solution for this similar question.



    A rather quick fix using scalerel would be the following.



    Conveniently, scalerel provides scaleleftright[<max width>]{<left obj>}{<stuff>}{<right obj>} (and a comparable stretchleftright) for scaling/stretching both <left obj> and <right obj> to the height of <stuff> (constrained, if required and optional, to a width of <max width>). Here's a quick example:





    documentclass{article}
    
usepackage{scalerel, stmaryrd} % http://ctan.org/pkg/scalerel
    

    
newcommand{gaussbracket}[1]{stretchleftright{llfloor}{#1}{rrfloor}}
    

    
begin{document}
    
[ gaussbracket{displaystylesum_{i=1}^n i} ]
    
end{document}





    share|improve this answer





















    • 1





      Very very good. I have really appreciated your code.

      – Sebastiano
      5 hours ago











    • Thanks, but it's not exactly what I wanted. I wanted a pair of commands, one for left and one for right bracket, which can be resized by big, Big, etc. Also, the scaled symbol does not look so good (too thick vertical line).

      – azimut
      3 hours ago
















    3












    3








    3







    Thanks to Werner for providing a solution for this similar question.



    A rather quick fix using scalerel would be the following.



    Conveniently, scalerel provides scaleleftright[<max width>]{<left obj>}{<stuff>}{<right obj>} (and a comparable stretchleftright) for scaling/stretching both <left obj> and <right obj> to the height of <stuff> (constrained, if required and optional, to a width of <max width>). Here's a quick example:





    documentclass{article}
    
usepackage{scalerel, stmaryrd} % http://ctan.org/pkg/scalerel
    

    
newcommand{gaussbracket}[1]{stretchleftright{llfloor}{#1}{rrfloor}}
    

    
begin{document}
    
[ gaussbracket{displaystylesum_{i=1}^n i} ]
    
end{document}





    share|improve this answer















    Thanks to Werner for providing a solution for this similar question.



    A rather quick fix using scalerel would be the following.



    Conveniently, scalerel provides scaleleftright[<max width>]{<left obj>}{<stuff>}{<right obj>} (and a comparable stretchleftright) for scaling/stretching both <left obj> and <right obj> to the height of <stuff> (constrained, if required and optional, to a width of <max width>). Here's a quick example:





    documentclass{article}
    
usepackage{scalerel, stmaryrd} % http://ctan.org/pkg/scalerel
    

    
newcommand{gaussbracket}[1]{stretchleftright{llfloor}{#1}{rrfloor}}
    

    
begin{document}
    
[ gaussbracket{displaystylesum_{i=1}^n i} ]
    
end{document}






    share|improve this answer














    share|improve this answer



    share|improve this answer








    edited 5 hours ago

























    answered 5 hours ago









    PeiffapPeiffap

    787




    787








    • 1





      Very very good. I have really appreciated your code.

      – Sebastiano
      5 hours ago











    • Thanks, but it's not exactly what I wanted. I wanted a pair of commands, one for left and one for right bracket, which can be resized by big, Big, etc. Also, the scaled symbol does not look so good (too thick vertical line).

      – azimut
      3 hours ago
















    • 1





      Very very good. I have really appreciated your code.

      – Sebastiano
      5 hours ago











    • Thanks, but it's not exactly what I wanted. I wanted a pair of commands, one for left and one for right bracket, which can be resized by big, Big, etc. Also, the scaled symbol does not look so good (too thick vertical line).

      – azimut
      3 hours ago










    1




    1





    Very very good. I have really appreciated your code.

    – Sebastiano
    5 hours ago





    Very very good. I have really appreciated your code.

    – Sebastiano
    5 hours ago













    Thanks, but it's not exactly what I wanted. I wanted a pair of commands, one for left and one for right bracket, which can be resized by big, Big, etc. Also, the scaled symbol does not look so good (too thick vertical line).

    – azimut
    3 hours ago







    Thanks, but it's not exactly what I wanted. I wanted a pair of commands, one for left and one for right bracket, which can be resized by big, Big, etc. Also, the scaled symbol does not look so good (too thick vertical line).

    – azimut
    3 hours ago













    2














    An option if you don't want to use any packages other than amsmath would be to place two lfloors next to each other with a little negative space between:



    enter image description here



    This has the advantage of not thickening the horizontal portion of the delimiter. 



    documentclass{article}
    
usepackage{amsmath}
    

    
newcommand{gaussbr}[1]{%
    
    leftlfloorhspace{-.33em}leftlfloor #1rightrfloorhspace{-.33em}rightrfloor%
    
    }
    

    
begin{document}
    

    
[
    
gaussbr{A}gaussbr{sum_{n=0}^{infty}a_n}
    
]
    

    
end{document}


    Of course, you can adjust the amount of negative space to your liking.






    share|improve this answer






























      2














      An option if you don't want to use any packages other than amsmath would be to place two lfloors next to each other with a little negative space between:



      enter image description here



      This has the advantage of not thickening the horizontal portion of the delimiter. 



      documentclass{article}
      
usepackage{amsmath}
      

      
newcommand{gaussbr}[1]{%
      
    leftlfloorhspace{-.33em}leftlfloor #1rightrfloorhspace{-.33em}rightrfloor%
      
    }
      

      
begin{document}
      

      
[
      
gaussbr{A}gaussbr{sum_{n=0}^{infty}a_n}
      
]
      

      
end{document}


      Of course, you can adjust the amount of negative space to your liking.






      share|improve this answer




























        2












        2








        2







        An option if you don't want to use any packages other than amsmath would be to place two lfloors next to each other with a little negative space between:



        enter image description here



        This has the advantage of not thickening the horizontal portion of the delimiter. 



        documentclass{article}
        
usepackage{amsmath}
        

        
newcommand{gaussbr}[1]{%
        
    leftlfloorhspace{-.33em}leftlfloor #1rightrfloorhspace{-.33em}rightrfloor%
        
    }
        

        
begin{document}
        

        
[
        
gaussbr{A}gaussbr{sum_{n=0}^{infty}a_n}
        
]
        

        
end{document}


        Of course, you can adjust the amount of negative space to your liking.






        share|improve this answer















        An option if you don't want to use any packages other than amsmath would be to place two lfloors next to each other with a little negative space between:



        enter image description here



        This has the advantage of not thickening the horizontal portion of the delimiter. 



        documentclass{article}
        
usepackage{amsmath}
        

        
newcommand{gaussbr}[1]{%
        
    leftlfloorhspace{-.33em}leftlfloor #1rightrfloorhspace{-.33em}rightrfloor%
        
    }
        

        
begin{document}
        

        
[
        
gaussbr{A}gaussbr{sum_{n=0}^{infty}a_n}
        
]
        

        
end{document}


        Of course, you can adjust the amount of negative space to your liking.







        share|improve this answer














        share|improve this answer



        share|improve this answer








        edited 1 hour ago

























        answered 1 hour ago









        Sandy GSandy G

        3,2771425




        3,2771425






























            draft saved

            draft discarded




















































            Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


            • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

            But avoid …



            • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

            • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


            To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




            draft saved


            draft discarded














            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f480159%2fgauss-brackets-with-double-vertical-lines%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown





















































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown

































            Required, but never shown














            Required, but never shown












            Required, but never shown







            Required, but never shown







            -

            Popular posts from this blog

            SQL Server 17 - Attemping to backup to remote NAS but Access is denied

            Image
            .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0; } 0 I was attemping to use Ola Hallengrens scripts to backup to a remote NAS, but it was failing and not giving any direct errors, so I tried doing it manually using Server Management Studio and got the following error: TITLE: Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio Failed to retrieve data for this request. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Sdk.Sfc) For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft%20SQL%20Server&LinkId=20476 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. (Microsoft.SqlServer.ConnectionInfo) The operating system returned the error '0x80070005(Access is denied.)&#
            Read more

            Always On Availability groups resolving state after failover - Remote harden of transaction...

            Image
            0 My explanation will be opinion based as it is based on my findings. If more information is needed, I am always happy to add it. The setup We have 4 SQL Server 2016 Instances, and all 4 underlying servers are in a WSFC (In my eyes a strange setup since Always On AG's are 2 by 2. But that is a different question.) 4 nodes + Fileshare witness Version: 13.0.5026.0 (all nodes) The instances that are having the failover issues are instances 1 & 2. They have 3 AG's between them. AG1 is primary on instance 1 and is having the issue. AG2 and AG3 are primary on instance 2. Instances 3 and 4 have their own separate AG's (2). AG1's settings The week before Last week, after checking for long running queries (none) and the synchronization state (green accross the board) we initiated a
            Read more

            Restoring from pg_dump with foreign key constraints

            Image
            5 2 In restoring a database from a pg_dump , a number of errors are being generated and the whole table is subsequently being ignored. An example: ERROR: insert or update on table "channelproducts" violates foreign key constraint "fk_rails_dfaae373a5" DETAIL: Key (channel_id)=(1) is not present in table "channels". Interestingly enough, I've noted that all these instances are popping up because of the sequence of loading. channels is after channelproducts both alphabetically and in the file and thus I can understand why postgres complains about having to create a child without a parent. caveat: the foreign key is being generated automatically by rails 4.2: I could remove the problem at the source but that still does not really solve the problem... version: PostgreSQL
            Read more