What's wrong with this bogus proof?












2












$begingroup$


enter image description here



What is the mistake here? Is it matter of the unit?






discrete-mathematics proof-verification







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Yes, the units don’t match across the 2nd equals sign
    $endgroup$
    – Alex
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Yes, you have to square the unit. Conversion of squared units is different: if 100 cents is a dollar, then $100^2$ cents squared is a dollar squred.
    $endgroup$
    – Dean Young
    1 hour ago


















2












$begingroup$


enter image description here



What is the mistake here? Is it matter of the unit?






discrete-mathematics proof-verification







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Yes, the units don’t match across the 2nd equals sign
    $endgroup$
    – Alex
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Yes, you have to square the unit. Conversion of squared units is different: if 100 cents is a dollar, then $100^2$ cents squared is a dollar squred.
    $endgroup$
    – Dean Young
    1 hour ago
















2












2








2





$begingroup$


enter image description here



What is the mistake here? Is it matter of the unit?






discrete-mathematics proof-verification







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$




enter image description here



What is the mistake here? Is it matter of the unit?






discrete-mathematics proof-verification




discrete-mathematics proof-verification






share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question











share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question










asked 1 hour ago









ShinobuIsMyWifeShinobuIsMyWife

313




313








  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Yes, the units don’t match across the 2nd equals sign
    $endgroup$
    – Alex
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Yes, you have to square the unit. Conversion of squared units is different: if 100 cents is a dollar, then $100^2$ cents squared is a dollar squred.
    $endgroup$
    – Dean Young
    1 hour ago
















  • 5




    $begingroup$
    Yes, the units don’t match across the 2nd equals sign
    $endgroup$
    – Alex
    1 hour ago






  • 2




    $begingroup$
    Yes, you have to square the unit. Conversion of squared units is different: if 100 cents is a dollar, then $100^2$ cents squared is a dollar squred.
    $endgroup$
    – Dean Young
    1 hour ago










5




5




$begingroup$
Yes, the units don’t match across the 2nd equals sign
$endgroup$
– Alex
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Yes, the units don’t match across the 2nd equals sign
$endgroup$
– Alex
1 hour ago




2




2




$begingroup$
Yes, you have to square the unit. Conversion of squared units is different: if 100 cents is a dollar, then $100^2$ cents squared is a dollar squred.
$endgroup$
– Dean Young
1 hour ago






$begingroup$
Yes, you have to square the unit. Conversion of squared units is different: if 100 cents is a dollar, then $100^2$ cents squared is a dollar squred.
$endgroup$
– Dean Young
1 hour ago












2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















4












$begingroup$

$$0.01=(sqrt{$}0.1)^2$, not $($0.1)^2$.






share|cite|improve this answer









$endgroup$





















    2












    $begingroup$

    You can clearly see the fallacy if you keep track of the units:




    • In the second equality, $$0.01 = $0.1times $0.1$ is not true, if you are doing units.


    • Even if the second equality were true, the third one gives problems: since $c=$/100$, you have
      $$
      ($0.1)^2=left(frac c{100},0.1right)^2=frac{c^2}{100}timesfrac1{10}=frac{c^2}{1000}.
      $$
      This is not $(10c)^2=100c^2$.



    In conclusion, two equalities are bogus, and so is the argument.






    share|cite|improve this answer











    $endgroup$













      Your Answer





      StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
      return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
      StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
      StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
      });
      });
      }, "mathjax-editing");

      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "69"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: true,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: 10,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144460%2fwhats-wrong-with-this-bogus-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      4












      $begingroup$

      $$0.01=(sqrt{$}0.1)^2$, not $($0.1)^2$.






      share|cite|improve this answer









      $endgroup$


















        4












        $begingroup$

        $$0.01=(sqrt{$}0.1)^2$, not $($0.1)^2$.






        share|cite|improve this answer









        $endgroup$
















          4












          4








          4





          $begingroup$

          $$0.01=(sqrt{$}0.1)^2$, not $($0.1)^2$.






          share|cite|improve this answer









          $endgroup$



          $$0.01=(sqrt{$}0.1)^2$, not $($0.1)^2$.







          share|cite|improve this answer












          share|cite|improve this answer



          share|cite|improve this answer










          answered 1 hour ago









          ArthurArthur

          117k7116200




          117k7116200























              2












              $begingroup$

              You can clearly see the fallacy if you keep track of the units:




              • In the second equality, $$0.01 = $0.1times $0.1$ is not true, if you are doing units.


              • Even if the second equality were true, the third one gives problems: since $c=$/100$, you have
                $$
                ($0.1)^2=left(frac c{100},0.1right)^2=frac{c^2}{100}timesfrac1{10}=frac{c^2}{1000}.
                $$
                This is not $(10c)^2=100c^2$.



              In conclusion, two equalities are bogus, and so is the argument.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$


















                2












                $begingroup$

                You can clearly see the fallacy if you keep track of the units:




                • In the second equality, $$0.01 = $0.1times $0.1$ is not true, if you are doing units.


                • Even if the second equality were true, the third one gives problems: since $c=$/100$, you have
                  $$
                  ($0.1)^2=left(frac c{100},0.1right)^2=frac{c^2}{100}timesfrac1{10}=frac{c^2}{1000}.
                  $$
                  This is not $(10c)^2=100c^2$.



                In conclusion, two equalities are bogus, and so is the argument.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$
















                  2












                  2








                  2





                  $begingroup$

                  You can clearly see the fallacy if you keep track of the units:




                  • In the second equality, $$0.01 = $0.1times $0.1$ is not true, if you are doing units.


                  • Even if the second equality were true, the third one gives problems: since $c=$/100$, you have
                    $$
                    ($0.1)^2=left(frac c{100},0.1right)^2=frac{c^2}{100}timesfrac1{10}=frac{c^2}{1000}.
                    $$
                    This is not $(10c)^2=100c^2$.



                  In conclusion, two equalities are bogus, and so is the argument.






                  share|cite|improve this answer











                  $endgroup$



                  You can clearly see the fallacy if you keep track of the units:




                  • In the second equality, $$0.01 = $0.1times $0.1$ is not true, if you are doing units.


                  • Even if the second equality were true, the third one gives problems: since $c=$/100$, you have
                    $$
                    ($0.1)^2=left(frac c{100},0.1right)^2=frac{c^2}{100}timesfrac1{10}=frac{c^2}{1000}.
                    $$
                    This is not $(10c)^2=100c^2$.



                  In conclusion, two equalities are bogus, and so is the argument.







                  share|cite|improve this answer














                  share|cite|improve this answer



                  share|cite|improve this answer








                  edited 1 hour ago









                  J. W. Tanner

                  3,0981320




                  3,0981320










                  answered 1 hour ago









                  Martin ArgeramiMartin Argerami

                  128k1184184




                  128k1184184






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3144460%2fwhats-wrong-with-this-bogus-proof%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      SQL Server 17 - Attemping to backup to remote NAS but Access is denied

                      Image
                      .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0; } 0 I was attemping to use Ola Hallengrens scripts to backup to a remote NAS, but it was failing and not giving any direct errors, so I tried doing it manually using Server Management Studio and got the following error: TITLE: Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio Failed to retrieve data for this request. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Sdk.Sfc) For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft%20SQL%20Server&LinkId=20476 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. (Microsoft.SqlServer.ConnectionInfo) The operating system returned the error '0x80070005(Access is denied.)&#
                      Read more

                      Always On Availability groups resolving state after failover - Remote harden of transaction...

                      Image
                      0 My explanation will be opinion based as it is based on my findings. If more information is needed, I am always happy to add it. The setup We have 4 SQL Server 2016 Instances, and all 4 underlying servers are in a WSFC (In my eyes a strange setup since Always On AG's are 2 by 2. But that is a different question.) 4 nodes + Fileshare witness Version: 13.0.5026.0 (all nodes) The instances that are having the failover issues are instances 1 & 2. They have 3 AG's between them. AG1 is primary on instance 1 and is having the issue. AG2 and AG3 are primary on instance 2. Instances 3 and 4 have their own separate AG's (2). AG1's settings The week before Last week, after checking for long running queries (none) and the synchronization state (green accross the board) we initiated a
                      Read more

                      Restoring from pg_dump with foreign key constraints

                      Image
                      5 2 In restoring a database from a pg_dump , a number of errors are being generated and the whole table is subsequently being ignored. An example: ERROR: insert or update on table "channelproducts" violates foreign key constraint "fk_rails_dfaae373a5" DETAIL: Key (channel_id)=(1) is not present in table "channels". Interestingly enough, I've noted that all these instances are popping up because of the sequence of loading. channels is after channelproducts both alphabetically and in the file and thus I can understand why postgres complains about having to create a child without a parent. caveat: the foreign key is being generated automatically by rails 4.2: I could remove the problem at the source but that still does not really solve the problem... version: PostgreSQL
                      Read more