Why && lightning expression operator doesn't work?
According to this reference the syntax below:
<aura:if isTrue="{!and(v.isVisible,!empty(v.subjectsList))}">
should be equivalent to:
<aura:if isTrue="{!v.isVisible && !empty(v.subjectsList)}">
However, I receive the message below when I try to save the lightning component to the sandbox:
FIELD_INTEGRITY_EXCEPTION - c:SubjectSelectionView_GCC:69,34: ParseError at [row,col]:[70,34]
Message: The entity name must immediately follow the '&' in the entity reference.: Source
So, What am I missing?
lightning-aura-components
asked 44 mins ago
SauloSaulo
91110
add a comment |
According to this reference the syntax below:
<aura:if isTrue="{!and(v.isVisible,!empty(v.subjectsList))}">
should be equivalent to:
<aura:if isTrue="{!v.isVisible && !empty(v.subjectsList)}">
However, I receive the message below when I try to save the lightning component to the sandbox:
FIELD_INTEGRITY_EXCEPTION - c:SubjectSelectionView_GCC:69,34: ParseError at [row,col]:[70,34]
Message: The entity name must immediately follow the '&' in the entity reference.: Source
So, What am I missing?
lightning-aura-components
asked 44 mins ago
SauloSaulo
91110
add a comment |
According to this reference the syntax below:
<aura:if isTrue="{!and(v.isVisible,!empty(v.subjectsList))}">
should be equivalent to:
<aura:if isTrue="{!v.isVisible && !empty(v.subjectsList)}">
However, I receive the message below when I try to save the lightning component to the sandbox:
FIELD_INTEGRITY_EXCEPTION - c:SubjectSelectionView_GCC:69,34: ParseError at [row,col]:[70,34]
Message: The entity name must immediately follow the '&' in the entity reference.: Source
So, What am I missing?
lightning-aura-components
asked 44 mins ago
SauloSaulo
91110
According to this reference the syntax below:
<aura:if isTrue="{!and(v.isVisible,!empty(v.subjectsList))}">
should be equivalent to:
<aura:if isTrue="{!v.isVisible && !empty(v.subjectsList)}">
However, I receive the message below when I try to save the lightning component to the sandbox:
FIELD_INTEGRITY_EXCEPTION - c:SubjectSelectionView_GCC:69,34: ParseError at [row,col]:[70,34]
Message: The entity name must immediately follow the '&' in the entity reference.: Source
So, What am I missing?
lightning-aura-components
lightning-aura-components
asked 44 mins ago
SauloSaulo
91110
asked 44 mins ago
SauloSaulo
91110
asked 44 mins ago
SauloSaulo
91110
asked 44 mins ago
SauloSaulo
91110
asked 44 mins ago
SauloSaulo
91110
91110
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
Instead of && you can use && (the HTML entity for &). That seems to satisfy the parser and the expression will still execute your logic correctly.
So your code will be:
<aura:if isTrue="{!v.isVisible && !empty(v.subjectsList)}">
answered 35 mins ago
John TowersJohn Towers
2,1151816
3
@JayantDas No, Lightning requires it. It is not specific to the Developer Console. Go ahead and try it out in your favorite IDE. ... It's technically an oversight in the documentation, as far as I can tell. Aura has always worked this way.
– sfdcfox
27 mins ago
AND function is more readable in case we have 2 parameters:<aura:if isTrue="{!and(v.isVisible, !empty(v.subjectsList))}">
– Raul
23 mins ago
@sfdcfox that's new to me. I recollect using at least||at places and thought&&would be the same.
– Jayant Das
22 mins ago
@JayantDas yeah, the .cmp file is parsed as XML, and follows the rules of XML precisely. & is the start of a character entity like>and&.
– sfdcfox
20 mins ago
@JohnTowers +1 for the sharing this, a new learning today. Everyday is a new day in Salesforce.
– Jayant Das
18 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "459"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f247693%2fwhy-lightning-expression-operator-doesnt-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Instead of && you can use && (the HTML entity for &). That seems to satisfy the parser and the expression will still execute your logic correctly.
So your code will be:
<aura:if isTrue="{!v.isVisible && !empty(v.subjectsList)}">
answered 35 mins ago
John TowersJohn Towers
2,1151816
3
@JayantDas No, Lightning requires it. It is not specific to the Developer Console. Go ahead and try it out in your favorite IDE. ... It's technically an oversight in the documentation, as far as I can tell. Aura has always worked this way.
– sfdcfox
27 mins ago
AND function is more readable in case we have 2 parameters:<aura:if isTrue="{!and(v.isVisible, !empty(v.subjectsList))}">
– Raul
23 mins ago
@sfdcfox that's new to me. I recollect using at least||at places and thought&&would be the same.
– Jayant Das
22 mins ago
@JayantDas yeah, the .cmp file is parsed as XML, and follows the rules of XML precisely. & is the start of a character entity like>and&.
– sfdcfox
20 mins ago
@JohnTowers +1 for the sharing this, a new learning today. Everyday is a new day in Salesforce.
– Jayant Das
18 mins ago
add a comment |
Instead of && you can use && (the HTML entity for &). That seems to satisfy the parser and the expression will still execute your logic correctly.
So your code will be:
<aura:if isTrue="{!v.isVisible && !empty(v.subjectsList)}">
answered 35 mins ago
John TowersJohn Towers
2,1151816
3
@JayantDas No, Lightning requires it. It is not specific to the Developer Console. Go ahead and try it out in your favorite IDE. ... It's technically an oversight in the documentation, as far as I can tell. Aura has always worked this way.
– sfdcfox
27 mins ago
AND function is more readable in case we have 2 parameters:<aura:if isTrue="{!and(v.isVisible, !empty(v.subjectsList))}">
– Raul
23 mins ago
@sfdcfox that's new to me. I recollect using at least||at places and thought&&would be the same.
– Jayant Das
22 mins ago
@JayantDas yeah, the .cmp file is parsed as XML, and follows the rules of XML precisely. & is the start of a character entity like>and&.
– sfdcfox
20 mins ago
@JohnTowers +1 for the sharing this, a new learning today. Everyday is a new day in Salesforce.
– Jayant Das
18 mins ago
add a comment |
Instead of && you can use && (the HTML entity for &). That seems to satisfy the parser and the expression will still execute your logic correctly.
So your code will be:
<aura:if isTrue="{!v.isVisible && !empty(v.subjectsList)}">
answered 35 mins ago
John TowersJohn Towers
2,1151816
Instead of && you can use && (the HTML entity for &). That seems to satisfy the parser and the expression will still execute your logic correctly.
So your code will be:
<aura:if isTrue="{!v.isVisible && !empty(v.subjectsList)}">
answered 35 mins ago
John TowersJohn Towers
2,1151816
answered 35 mins ago
John TowersJohn Towers
2,1151816
answered 35 mins ago
John TowersJohn Towers
2,1151816
answered 35 mins ago
John TowersJohn Towers
2,1151816
2,1151816
3
@JayantDas No, Lightning requires it. It is not specific to the Developer Console. Go ahead and try it out in your favorite IDE. ... It's technically an oversight in the documentation, as far as I can tell. Aura has always worked this way.
– sfdcfox
27 mins ago
AND function is more readable in case we have 2 parameters:<aura:if isTrue="{!and(v.isVisible, !empty(v.subjectsList))}">
– Raul
23 mins ago
@sfdcfox that's new to me. I recollect using at least||at places and thought&&would be the same.
– Jayant Das
22 mins ago
@JayantDas yeah, the .cmp file is parsed as XML, and follows the rules of XML precisely. & is the start of a character entity like>and&.
– sfdcfox
20 mins ago
@JohnTowers +1 for the sharing this, a new learning today. Everyday is a new day in Salesforce.
– Jayant Das
18 mins ago
add a comment |
3
@JayantDas No, Lightning requires it. It is not specific to the Developer Console. Go ahead and try it out in your favorite IDE. ... It's technically an oversight in the documentation, as far as I can tell. Aura has always worked this way.
– sfdcfox
27 mins ago
AND function is more readable in case we have 2 parameters:<aura:if isTrue="{!and(v.isVisible, !empty(v.subjectsList))}">
– Raul
23 mins ago
@sfdcfox that's new to me. I recollect using at least||at places and thought&&would be the same.
– Jayant Das
22 mins ago
@JayantDas yeah, the .cmp file is parsed as XML, and follows the rules of XML precisely. & is the start of a character entity like>and&.
– sfdcfox
20 mins ago
@JohnTowers +1 for the sharing this, a new learning today. Everyday is a new day in Salesforce.
– Jayant Das
18 mins ago
3
3
@JayantDas No, Lightning requires it. It is not specific to the Developer Console. Go ahead and try it out in your favorite IDE. ... It's technically an oversight in the documentation, as far as I can tell. Aura has always worked this way.
– sfdcfox
27 mins ago
@JayantDas No, Lightning requires it. It is not specific to the Developer Console. Go ahead and try it out in your favorite IDE. ... It's technically an oversight in the documentation, as far as I can tell. Aura has always worked this way.
– sfdcfox
27 mins ago
AND function is more readable in case we have 2 parameters:
<aura:if isTrue="{!and(v.isVisible, !empty(v.subjectsList))}">– Raul
23 mins ago
AND function is more readable in case we have 2 parameters:
<aura:if isTrue="{!and(v.isVisible, !empty(v.subjectsList))}">– Raul
23 mins ago
@sfdcfox that's new to me. I recollect using at least
|| at places and thought && would be the same.– Jayant Das
22 mins ago
@sfdcfox that's new to me. I recollect using at least
|| at places and thought && would be the same.– Jayant Das
22 mins ago
@JayantDas yeah, the .cmp file is parsed as XML, and follows the rules of XML precisely. & is the start of a character entity like
> and &.– sfdcfox
20 mins ago
@JayantDas yeah, the .cmp file is parsed as XML, and follows the rules of XML precisely. & is the start of a character entity like
> and &.– sfdcfox
20 mins ago
@JohnTowers +1 for the sharing this, a new learning today. Everyday is a new day in Salesforce.
– Jayant Das
18 mins ago
@JohnTowers +1 for the sharing this, a new learning today. Everyday is a new day in Salesforce.
– Jayant Das
18 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Salesforce Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fsalesforce.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f247693%2fwhy-lightning-expression-operator-doesnt-work%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
