Joining three tables with intermediate nullable option and filter condition












0















Sorry if this seems like a dumb question, but I've read through tens of answers and tried many different options, yet my query results were either overly inclusive or exclusive.



The basic scenario is, having tables A <- B <- C, and the foreign keys A.b_id (nullable) and B.c_id, how can I get A's where either:





  • b_id is null (B is absent)


  • b_id is not null (B is present), AND its associated C fits a particular criterion (C.active is true, or similar)


To restate, an A may be independent of a B, but every B belongs to a C, and I would like to get the A's that either have no B or have a B that belongs to a C with a specific condition.



Many answers seem to deal with an A that is joined to both B and C, but in this case it's the middle or intermediate table that is optional. (And I haven't been able to figure out how to assemble parts of different examples into a working solution.)



It may be possible through a UNION, but that also seems like a last resort. Is there a way to do this through joins?



I had tried inner joining B and C and then having A left join that as a derived (aliased) table, but this would still return all results, even where (using the example) active was false.



Thanks.









share







New contributor




SexxLuthor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    0















    Sorry if this seems like a dumb question, but I've read through tens of answers and tried many different options, yet my query results were either overly inclusive or exclusive.



    The basic scenario is, having tables A <- B <- C, and the foreign keys A.b_id (nullable) and B.c_id, how can I get A's where either:





    • b_id is null (B is absent)


    • b_id is not null (B is present), AND its associated C fits a particular criterion (C.active is true, or similar)


    To restate, an A may be independent of a B, but every B belongs to a C, and I would like to get the A's that either have no B or have a B that belongs to a C with a specific condition.



    Many answers seem to deal with an A that is joined to both B and C, but in this case it's the middle or intermediate table that is optional. (And I haven't been able to figure out how to assemble parts of different examples into a working solution.)



    It may be possible through a UNION, but that also seems like a last resort. Is there a way to do this through joins?



    I had tried inner joining B and C and then having A left join that as a derived (aliased) table, but this would still return all results, even where (using the example) active was false.



    Thanks.









    share







    New contributor




    SexxLuthor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      0












      0








      0








      Sorry if this seems like a dumb question, but I've read through tens of answers and tried many different options, yet my query results were either overly inclusive or exclusive.



      The basic scenario is, having tables A <- B <- C, and the foreign keys A.b_id (nullable) and B.c_id, how can I get A's where either:





      • b_id is null (B is absent)


      • b_id is not null (B is present), AND its associated C fits a particular criterion (C.active is true, or similar)


      To restate, an A may be independent of a B, but every B belongs to a C, and I would like to get the A's that either have no B or have a B that belongs to a C with a specific condition.



      Many answers seem to deal with an A that is joined to both B and C, but in this case it's the middle or intermediate table that is optional. (And I haven't been able to figure out how to assemble parts of different examples into a working solution.)



      It may be possible through a UNION, but that also seems like a last resort. Is there a way to do this through joins?



      I had tried inner joining B and C and then having A left join that as a derived (aliased) table, but this would still return all results, even where (using the example) active was false.



      Thanks.









      share







      New contributor




      SexxLuthor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      Sorry if this seems like a dumb question, but I've read through tens of answers and tried many different options, yet my query results were either overly inclusive or exclusive.



      The basic scenario is, having tables A <- B <- C, and the foreign keys A.b_id (nullable) and B.c_id, how can I get A's where either:





      • b_id is null (B is absent)


      • b_id is not null (B is present), AND its associated C fits a particular criterion (C.active is true, or similar)


      To restate, an A may be independent of a B, but every B belongs to a C, and I would like to get the A's that either have no B or have a B that belongs to a C with a specific condition.



      Many answers seem to deal with an A that is joined to both B and C, but in this case it's the middle or intermediate table that is optional. (And I haven't been able to figure out how to assemble parts of different examples into a working solution.)



      It may be possible through a UNION, but that also seems like a last resort. Is there a way to do this through joins?



      I had tried inner joining B and C and then having A left join that as a derived (aliased) table, but this would still return all results, even where (using the example) active was false.



      Thanks.







      postgresql query





      share







      New contributor




      SexxLuthor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share







      New contributor




      SexxLuthor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share



      share






      New contributor




      SexxLuthor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 6 mins ago









      SexxLuthorSexxLuthor

      1011




      1011




      New contributor




      SexxLuthor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      SexxLuthor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      SexxLuthor is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "182"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          SexxLuthor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f227749%2fjoining-three-tables-with-intermediate-nullable-option-and-filter-condition%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          SexxLuthor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          SexxLuthor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          SexxLuthor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          SexxLuthor is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f227749%2fjoining-three-tables-with-intermediate-nullable-option-and-filter-condition%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          SQL Server 17 - Attemping to backup to remote NAS but Access is denied

          Always On Availability groups resolving state after failover - Remote harden of transaction...

          Restoring from pg_dump with foreign key constraints