Does Inheritance Make Sense with This Requirement (Oracle)
I'm using Oracle 12c. Given an existing table (we call it TBL_M), and based on the criteria below, I was wondering if using inheritance makes sense to lay out the entities:
Information for one group of data (we call it Group One):
RATE
AMOUNT
FREQUENCY
And information for another group of data (we call it Group Two):
RATE
AMOUNT
FREQUENCY
DEPTH
So the fields needed for this become:
TBL_P
TBL_P_ID
RATE
AMOUNT
FREQUENCY
TBL_M_ID (fk)
TBL_C
TBL_C_ID
DEPTH
TBL_P_ID (fk)
For Group Two, every time we want to make an entry, we populate both tables (TBL_P and TBL_C). However, when the information is for Group One, TBL_P.TBL_M_ID is going to be set to NULL redundantly.
Would it be more efficient to split this into two separate tables, one for Group One, and the other for Group Two? e.g.
TBL_ONE
TBL_ONE_ID
RATE
AMOUNT
FREQUENCY
TBL_M_ID (fk)
TBL_TWO
TBL_TWO_ID
RATE
AMOUNT
FREQUENCY
DEPTH
TBL_M_ID (fk)
oracle database-design oracle-12c inheritance
asked 8 mins ago
NuCradleNuCradle
1
New contributor
NuCradle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I'm using Oracle 12c. Given an existing table (we call it TBL_M), and based on the criteria below, I was wondering if using inheritance makes sense to lay out the entities:
Information for one group of data (we call it Group One):
RATE
AMOUNT
FREQUENCY
And information for another group of data (we call it Group Two):
RATE
AMOUNT
FREQUENCY
DEPTH
So the fields needed for this become:
TBL_P
TBL_P_ID
RATE
AMOUNT
FREQUENCY
TBL_M_ID (fk)
TBL_C
TBL_C_ID
DEPTH
TBL_P_ID (fk)
For Group Two, every time we want to make an entry, we populate both tables (TBL_P and TBL_C). However, when the information is for Group One, TBL_P.TBL_M_ID is going to be set to NULL redundantly.
Would it be more efficient to split this into two separate tables, one for Group One, and the other for Group Two? e.g.
TBL_ONE
TBL_ONE_ID
RATE
AMOUNT
FREQUENCY
TBL_M_ID (fk)
TBL_TWO
TBL_TWO_ID
RATE
AMOUNT
FREQUENCY
DEPTH
TBL_M_ID (fk)
oracle database-design oracle-12c inheritance
asked 8 mins ago
NuCradleNuCradle
1
New contributor
NuCradle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I'm using Oracle 12c. Given an existing table (we call it TBL_M), and based on the criteria below, I was wondering if using inheritance makes sense to lay out the entities:
Information for one group of data (we call it Group One):
RATE
AMOUNT
FREQUENCY
And information for another group of data (we call it Group Two):
RATE
AMOUNT
FREQUENCY
DEPTH
So the fields needed for this become:
TBL_P
TBL_P_ID
RATE
AMOUNT
FREQUENCY
TBL_M_ID (fk)
TBL_C
TBL_C_ID
DEPTH
TBL_P_ID (fk)
For Group Two, every time we want to make an entry, we populate both tables (TBL_P and TBL_C). However, when the information is for Group One, TBL_P.TBL_M_ID is going to be set to NULL redundantly.
Would it be more efficient to split this into two separate tables, one for Group One, and the other for Group Two? e.g.
TBL_ONE
TBL_ONE_ID
RATE
AMOUNT
FREQUENCY
TBL_M_ID (fk)
TBL_TWO
TBL_TWO_ID
RATE
AMOUNT
FREQUENCY
DEPTH
TBL_M_ID (fk)
oracle database-design oracle-12c inheritance
asked 8 mins ago
NuCradleNuCradle
1
New contributor
NuCradle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I'm using Oracle 12c. Given an existing table (we call it TBL_M), and based on the criteria below, I was wondering if using inheritance makes sense to lay out the entities:
Information for one group of data (we call it Group One):
RATE
AMOUNT
FREQUENCY
And information for another group of data (we call it Group Two):
RATE
AMOUNT
FREQUENCY
DEPTH
So the fields needed for this become:
TBL_P
TBL_P_ID
RATE
AMOUNT
FREQUENCY
TBL_M_ID (fk)
TBL_C
TBL_C_ID
DEPTH
TBL_P_ID (fk)
For Group Two, every time we want to make an entry, we populate both tables (TBL_P and TBL_C). However, when the information is for Group One, TBL_P.TBL_M_ID is going to be set to NULL redundantly.
Would it be more efficient to split this into two separate tables, one for Group One, and the other for Group Two? e.g.
TBL_ONE
TBL_ONE_ID
RATE
AMOUNT
FREQUENCY
TBL_M_ID (fk)
TBL_TWO
TBL_TWO_ID
RATE
AMOUNT
FREQUENCY
DEPTH
TBL_M_ID (fk)
oracle database-design oracle-12c inheritance
oracle database-design oracle-12c inheritance
asked 8 mins ago
NuCradleNuCradle
1
New contributor
NuCradle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 8 mins ago
NuCradleNuCradle
1
New contributor
NuCradle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 8 mins ago
NuCradleNuCradle
1
New contributor
NuCradle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 8 mins ago
NuCradleNuCradle
1
asked 8 mins ago
NuCradleNuCradle
1
1
New contributor
NuCradle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
NuCradle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
NuCradle is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
NuCradle is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f233703%2fdoes-inheritance-make-sense-with-this-requirement-oracle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
NuCradle is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
NuCradle is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
NuCradle is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
NuCradle is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f233703%2fdoes-inheritance-make-sense-with-this-requirement-oracle%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
