How to multi-match two tables efficiently?












0















I'm relatively new to database-design and want to create a SQLite database for an application. The application needs to handle lots of objects and assign them to a smaller list of categories. Both tables have multiple columns. The problem is, that every object may belong to an indefinite amount of categories and I need to query both efficiently: All objects that belong to a specific category and for any object to which categories it belongs, which is why I can't just use joins.



My idea was to create a third table with just two columns, matching objects to categories. But it looks like an ugly solution to me and I also don't know what indices I should set upon it, if any at all. I might end up with the key column's data being saved four times: In the original table, in its PRIMARY KEY, in the matching table, and in the index on that table.



Is there a better approach or maybe even a standard method to handle such situations?









share







New contributor




Bachsau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    0















    I'm relatively new to database-design and want to create a SQLite database for an application. The application needs to handle lots of objects and assign them to a smaller list of categories. Both tables have multiple columns. The problem is, that every object may belong to an indefinite amount of categories and I need to query both efficiently: All objects that belong to a specific category and for any object to which categories it belongs, which is why I can't just use joins.



    My idea was to create a third table with just two columns, matching objects to categories. But it looks like an ugly solution to me and I also don't know what indices I should set upon it, if any at all. I might end up with the key column's data being saved four times: In the original table, in its PRIMARY KEY, in the matching table, and in the index on that table.



    Is there a better approach or maybe even a standard method to handle such situations?









    share







    New contributor




    Bachsau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      0












      0








      0








      I'm relatively new to database-design and want to create a SQLite database for an application. The application needs to handle lots of objects and assign them to a smaller list of categories. Both tables have multiple columns. The problem is, that every object may belong to an indefinite amount of categories and I need to query both efficiently: All objects that belong to a specific category and for any object to which categories it belongs, which is why I can't just use joins.



      My idea was to create a third table with just two columns, matching objects to categories. But it looks like an ugly solution to me and I also don't know what indices I should set upon it, if any at all. I might end up with the key column's data being saved four times: In the original table, in its PRIMARY KEY, in the matching table, and in the index on that table.



      Is there a better approach or maybe even a standard method to handle such situations?









      share







      New contributor




      Bachsau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      I'm relatively new to database-design and want to create a SQLite database for an application. The application needs to handle lots of objects and assign them to a smaller list of categories. Both tables have multiple columns. The problem is, that every object may belong to an indefinite amount of categories and I need to query both efficiently: All objects that belong to a specific category and for any object to which categories it belongs, which is why I can't just use joins.



      My idea was to create a third table with just two columns, matching objects to categories. But it looks like an ugly solution to me and I also don't know what indices I should set upon it, if any at all. I might end up with the key column's data being saved four times: In the original table, in its PRIMARY KEY, in the matching table, and in the index on that table.



      Is there a better approach or maybe even a standard method to handle such situations?







      database-design sqlite





      share







      New contributor




      Bachsau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.










      share







      New contributor




      Bachsau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.








      share



      share






      New contributor




      Bachsau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 2 mins ago









      BachsauBachsau

      101




      101




      New contributor




      Bachsau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      Bachsau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      Bachsau is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes












          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "182"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });






          Bachsau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f233713%2fhow-to-multi-match-two-tables-efficiently%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes








          Bachsau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          Bachsau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













          Bachsau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












          Bachsau is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















          Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f233713%2fhow-to-multi-match-two-tables-efficiently%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          SQL Server 17 - Attemping to backup to remote NAS but Access is denied

          Always On Availability groups resolving state after failover - Remote harden of transaction...

          Restoring from pg_dump with foreign key constraints