Staying grounded
$begingroup$
I found a somewhat meaningful sequence that is not on OEIS yet, incredible!
Here are the first 100 numbers of this sequence:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 2,
3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 6,
7, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, 29, 12,
13, 14, 15, 19, 23, 27, 31, 35, 39, 20,
21, 22, 23, 24, 29, 34, 39, 44, 49, 30,
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 41, 47, 53, 59, 42,
43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 55, 62, 69, 56,
57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 71, 79, 72,
73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 89, 90,
91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 4, …
Guess the next 10 numbers (and the pattern of course).
Hint 1:
I can write the pattern in eight words.
Hint 2:
Some mathematical purists would complain that I'm using an arbitrarily chosen standard. But this standard is used so often that many people don't even know about other ways to do it. These people could not solve this puzzle.
Hint 3, the first 1000 numbers of the sequence:
Will follow if nobody guesses it with the first 100 numbers.
mathematics number-sequence
asked 1 hour ago
Fabian RölingFabian Röling
1559
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I found a somewhat meaningful sequence that is not on OEIS yet, incredible!
Here are the first 100 numbers of this sequence:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 2,
3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 6,
7, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, 29, 12,
13, 14, 15, 19, 23, 27, 31, 35, 39, 20,
21, 22, 23, 24, 29, 34, 39, 44, 49, 30,
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 41, 47, 53, 59, 42,
43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 55, 62, 69, 56,
57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 71, 79, 72,
73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 89, 90,
91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 4, …
Guess the next 10 numbers (and the pattern of course).
Hint 1:
I can write the pattern in eight words.
Hint 2:
Some mathematical purists would complain that I'm using an arbitrarily chosen standard. But this standard is used so often that many people don't even know about other ways to do it. These people could not solve this puzzle.
Hint 3, the first 1000 numbers of the sequence:
Will follow if nobody guesses it with the first 100 numbers.
mathematics number-sequence
asked 1 hour ago
Fabian RölingFabian Röling
1559
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I found a somewhat meaningful sequence that is not on OEIS yet, incredible!
Here are the first 100 numbers of this sequence:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 2,
3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 6,
7, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, 29, 12,
13, 14, 15, 19, 23, 27, 31, 35, 39, 20,
21, 22, 23, 24, 29, 34, 39, 44, 49, 30,
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 41, 47, 53, 59, 42,
43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 55, 62, 69, 56,
57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 71, 79, 72,
73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 89, 90,
91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 4, …
Guess the next 10 numbers (and the pattern of course).
Hint 1:
I can write the pattern in eight words.
Hint 2:
Some mathematical purists would complain that I'm using an arbitrarily chosen standard. But this standard is used so often that many people don't even know about other ways to do it. These people could not solve this puzzle.
Hint 3, the first 1000 numbers of the sequence:
Will follow if nobody guesses it with the first 100 numbers.
mathematics number-sequence
asked 1 hour ago
Fabian RölingFabian Röling
1559
$endgroup$
I found a somewhat meaningful sequence that is not on OEIS yet, incredible!
Here are the first 100 numbers of this sequence:
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 2,
3, 5, 7, 9, 11, 13, 15, 17, 19, 6,
7, 8, 11, 14, 17, 20, 23, 26, 29, 12,
13, 14, 15, 19, 23, 27, 31, 35, 39, 20,
21, 22, 23, 24, 29, 34, 39, 44, 49, 30,
31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 41, 47, 53, 59, 42,
43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 55, 62, 69, 56,
57, 58, 59, 60, 61, 62, 63, 71, 79, 72,
73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 89, 90,
91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, 99, 4, …
Guess the next 10 numbers (and the pattern of course).
Hint 1:
I can write the pattern in eight words.
Hint 2:
Some mathematical purists would complain that I'm using an arbitrarily chosen standard. But this standard is used so often that many people don't even know about other ways to do it. These people could not solve this puzzle.
Hint 3, the first 1000 numbers of the sequence:
Will follow if nobody guesses it with the first 100 numbers.
mathematics number-sequence
mathematics number-sequence
asked 1 hour ago
Fabian RölingFabian Röling
1559
asked 1 hour ago
Fabian RölingFabian Röling
1559
asked 1 hour ago
Fabian RölingFabian Röling
1559
asked 1 hour ago
Fabian RölingFabian Röling
1559
asked 1 hour ago
Fabian RölingFabian Röling
1559
1559
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I think you are
Recasting the decimal representation of the numbers in the lowest possible base.
So for example
The decimal number 10, is also a number in base 2 (lowest possible) and is just 2.
The next 10 numbers will be
5, 11, 19, 29, 41, 55, 71, 89, 109, 6
i.e, 101 in base 2, 102 in base 3, 103 in base 4, 104 in base 5, etc
Title
This explanation also fits the title as instead of viewing each number in a higher base (10) we ground the number to its lowest possible. Thanks, Omega Krypton for the prompt.
answered 1 hour ago
hexominohexomino
38.2k2112180
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
this also explains the title, you can also add it in your answer ;) +1
$endgroup$
– Omega Krypton
59 mins ago
$begingroup$
Awww, that was apparently too easy, you solved it in less than 6 minutes. :D I also like that interpretation of the title, what I really thought was just "something with 'base'". What do you think, how many numbers in the sequence would have been enough to guess it?
$endgroup$
– Fabian Röling
54 mins ago
$begingroup$
I'm sorry I solved it quickly, it sometimes is just luck on whether somebody hits upon the right idea or not, this is a very clever puzzle. The fact that there is a drop every 10 did indicate that it had something to do with base. The big clue was dropping from 99 to 4 and maybe omitting that would make it slightly harder.
$endgroup$
– hexomino
42 mins ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "559"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f78790%2fstaying-grounded%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
I think you are
Recasting the decimal representation of the numbers in the lowest possible base.
So for example
The decimal number 10, is also a number in base 2 (lowest possible) and is just 2.
The next 10 numbers will be
5, 11, 19, 29, 41, 55, 71, 89, 109, 6
i.e, 101 in base 2, 102 in base 3, 103 in base 4, 104 in base 5, etc
Title
This explanation also fits the title as instead of viewing each number in a higher base (10) we ground the number to its lowest possible. Thanks, Omega Krypton for the prompt.
answered 1 hour ago
hexominohexomino
38.2k2112180
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
this also explains the title, you can also add it in your answer ;) +1
$endgroup$
– Omega Krypton
59 mins ago
$begingroup$
Awww, that was apparently too easy, you solved it in less than 6 minutes. :D I also like that interpretation of the title, what I really thought was just "something with 'base'". What do you think, how many numbers in the sequence would have been enough to guess it?
$endgroup$
– Fabian Röling
54 mins ago
$begingroup$
I'm sorry I solved it quickly, it sometimes is just luck on whether somebody hits upon the right idea or not, this is a very clever puzzle. The fact that there is a drop every 10 did indicate that it had something to do with base. The big clue was dropping from 99 to 4 and maybe omitting that would make it slightly harder.
$endgroup$
– hexomino
42 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think you are
Recasting the decimal representation of the numbers in the lowest possible base.
So for example
The decimal number 10, is also a number in base 2 (lowest possible) and is just 2.
The next 10 numbers will be
5, 11, 19, 29, 41, 55, 71, 89, 109, 6
i.e, 101 in base 2, 102 in base 3, 103 in base 4, 104 in base 5, etc
Title
This explanation also fits the title as instead of viewing each number in a higher base (10) we ground the number to its lowest possible. Thanks, Omega Krypton for the prompt.
answered 1 hour ago
hexominohexomino
38.2k2112180
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
this also explains the title, you can also add it in your answer ;) +1
$endgroup$
– Omega Krypton
59 mins ago
$begingroup$
Awww, that was apparently too easy, you solved it in less than 6 minutes. :D I also like that interpretation of the title, what I really thought was just "something with 'base'". What do you think, how many numbers in the sequence would have been enough to guess it?
$endgroup$
– Fabian Röling
54 mins ago
$begingroup$
I'm sorry I solved it quickly, it sometimes is just luck on whether somebody hits upon the right idea or not, this is a very clever puzzle. The fact that there is a drop every 10 did indicate that it had something to do with base. The big clue was dropping from 99 to 4 and maybe omitting that would make it slightly harder.
$endgroup$
– hexomino
42 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I think you are
Recasting the decimal representation of the numbers in the lowest possible base.
So for example
The decimal number 10, is also a number in base 2 (lowest possible) and is just 2.
The next 10 numbers will be
5, 11, 19, 29, 41, 55, 71, 89, 109, 6
i.e, 101 in base 2, 102 in base 3, 103 in base 4, 104 in base 5, etc
Title
This explanation also fits the title as instead of viewing each number in a higher base (10) we ground the number to its lowest possible. Thanks, Omega Krypton for the prompt.
answered 1 hour ago
hexominohexomino
38.2k2112180
$endgroup$
I think you are
Recasting the decimal representation of the numbers in the lowest possible base.
So for example
The decimal number 10, is also a number in base 2 (lowest possible) and is just 2.
The next 10 numbers will be
5, 11, 19, 29, 41, 55, 71, 89, 109, 6
i.e, 101 in base 2, 102 in base 3, 103 in base 4, 104 in base 5, etc
Title
This explanation also fits the title as instead of viewing each number in a higher base (10) we ground the number to its lowest possible. Thanks, Omega Krypton for the prompt.
answered 1 hour ago
hexominohexomino
38.2k2112180
edited 58 mins ago
answered 1 hour ago
hexominohexomino
38.2k2112180
answered 1 hour ago
hexominohexomino
38.2k2112180
answered 1 hour ago
hexominohexomino
38.2k2112180
38.2k2112180
1
$begingroup$
this also explains the title, you can also add it in your answer ;) +1
$endgroup$
– Omega Krypton
59 mins ago
$begingroup$
Awww, that was apparently too easy, you solved it in less than 6 minutes. :D I also like that interpretation of the title, what I really thought was just "something with 'base'". What do you think, how many numbers in the sequence would have been enough to guess it?
$endgroup$
– Fabian Röling
54 mins ago
$begingroup$
I'm sorry I solved it quickly, it sometimes is just luck on whether somebody hits upon the right idea or not, this is a very clever puzzle. The fact that there is a drop every 10 did indicate that it had something to do with base. The big clue was dropping from 99 to 4 and maybe omitting that would make it slightly harder.
$endgroup$
– hexomino
42 mins ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
this also explains the title, you can also add it in your answer ;) +1
$endgroup$
– Omega Krypton
59 mins ago
$begingroup$
Awww, that was apparently too easy, you solved it in less than 6 minutes. :D I also like that interpretation of the title, what I really thought was just "something with 'base'". What do you think, how many numbers in the sequence would have been enough to guess it?
$endgroup$
– Fabian Röling
54 mins ago
$begingroup$
I'm sorry I solved it quickly, it sometimes is just luck on whether somebody hits upon the right idea or not, this is a very clever puzzle. The fact that there is a drop every 10 did indicate that it had something to do with base. The big clue was dropping from 99 to 4 and maybe omitting that would make it slightly harder.
$endgroup$
– hexomino
42 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
this also explains the title, you can also add it in your answer ;) +1
$endgroup$
– Omega Krypton
59 mins ago
$begingroup$
this also explains the title, you can also add it in your answer ;) +1
$endgroup$
– Omega Krypton
59 mins ago
$begingroup$
Awww, that was apparently too easy, you solved it in less than 6 minutes. :D I also like that interpretation of the title, what I really thought was just "something with 'base'". What do you think, how many numbers in the sequence would have been enough to guess it?
$endgroup$
– Fabian Röling
54 mins ago
$begingroup$
Awww, that was apparently too easy, you solved it in less than 6 minutes. :D I also like that interpretation of the title, what I really thought was just "something with 'base'". What do you think, how many numbers in the sequence would have been enough to guess it?
$endgroup$
– Fabian Röling
54 mins ago
$begingroup$
I'm sorry I solved it quickly, it sometimes is just luck on whether somebody hits upon the right idea or not, this is a very clever puzzle. The fact that there is a drop every 10 did indicate that it had something to do with base. The big clue was dropping from 99 to 4 and maybe omitting that would make it slightly harder.
$endgroup$
– hexomino
42 mins ago
$begingroup$
I'm sorry I solved it quickly, it sometimes is just luck on whether somebody hits upon the right idea or not, this is a very clever puzzle. The fact that there is a drop every 10 did indicate that it had something to do with base. The big clue was dropping from 99 to 4 and maybe omitting that would make it slightly harder.
$endgroup$
– hexomino
42 mins ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Puzzling Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fpuzzling.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f78790%2fstaying-grounded%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
