Is “bridles lashing about the horses” correct?












2















Not sure what preposition + verb combinations you can use with bridles and horses. Is there a way of figuring these out as a non-native speaker? I feel you can only know after memorizing a couple of examples.



Anyway, the real question is the following:



Is the following grammatically correct?




The bridles were lashing about the horses as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




I am not sure why, but there's something about this sentence that doesn't seem right.






grammar







share|improve this question


















  • 1





    There's nothing grammatically wrong with that. I might suggest using reins instead of bridles, because the reins are the particular part of the bridle that is free to lash about.

    – Canadian Yankee
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    @CanadianYankee I am not sure that reins are considered part of the bridle. When you put a horse in a pasture or stall, you may still bridle the horse, but the bridle will have neither bit nor reins. As I said, not sure.

    – Jeff Morrow
    3 hours ago











  • Dependingon the dictionary consulted, a bridle may or may not include the reins and bit. In any event, it would be the reins that would be lashing about, and any suggestion that it was either the headstall or the bit that were lashing about would indicate someone did a very poor job putting it on, or that it had suffered some form of structural failure. In either event, my sympathy goes to the horse. Well, my sympathy always goes to any horse someone has felt the need to put a bit in their mouth.

    – Ed Grimm
    1 hour ago
















2















Not sure what preposition + verb combinations you can use with bridles and horses. Is there a way of figuring these out as a non-native speaker? I feel you can only know after memorizing a couple of examples.



Anyway, the real question is the following:



Is the following grammatically correct?




The bridles were lashing about the horses as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




I am not sure why, but there's something about this sentence that doesn't seem right.






grammar







share|improve this question


















  • 1





    There's nothing grammatically wrong with that. I might suggest using reins instead of bridles, because the reins are the particular part of the bridle that is free to lash about.

    – Canadian Yankee
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    @CanadianYankee I am not sure that reins are considered part of the bridle. When you put a horse in a pasture or stall, you may still bridle the horse, but the bridle will have neither bit nor reins. As I said, not sure.

    – Jeff Morrow
    3 hours ago











  • Dependingon the dictionary consulted, a bridle may or may not include the reins and bit. In any event, it would be the reins that would be lashing about, and any suggestion that it was either the headstall or the bit that were lashing about would indicate someone did a very poor job putting it on, or that it had suffered some form of structural failure. In either event, my sympathy goes to the horse. Well, my sympathy always goes to any horse someone has felt the need to put a bit in their mouth.

    – Ed Grimm
    1 hour ago














2












2








2








Not sure what preposition + verb combinations you can use with bridles and horses. Is there a way of figuring these out as a non-native speaker? I feel you can only know after memorizing a couple of examples.



Anyway, the real question is the following:



Is the following grammatically correct?




The bridles were lashing about the horses as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




I am not sure why, but there's something about this sentence that doesn't seem right.






grammar







share|improve this question














Not sure what preposition + verb combinations you can use with bridles and horses. Is there a way of figuring these out as a non-native speaker? I feel you can only know after memorizing a couple of examples.



Anyway, the real question is the following:



Is the following grammatically correct?




The bridles were lashing about the horses as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




I am not sure why, but there's something about this sentence that doesn't seem right.






grammar




grammar






share|improve this question













share|improve this question











share|improve this question




share|improve this question










asked 5 hours ago









repomonsterrepomonster

855




855








  • 1





    There's nothing grammatically wrong with that. I might suggest using reins instead of bridles, because the reins are the particular part of the bridle that is free to lash about.

    – Canadian Yankee
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    @CanadianYankee I am not sure that reins are considered part of the bridle. When you put a horse in a pasture or stall, you may still bridle the horse, but the bridle will have neither bit nor reins. As I said, not sure.

    – Jeff Morrow
    3 hours ago











  • Dependingon the dictionary consulted, a bridle may or may not include the reins and bit. In any event, it would be the reins that would be lashing about, and any suggestion that it was either the headstall or the bit that were lashing about would indicate someone did a very poor job putting it on, or that it had suffered some form of structural failure. In either event, my sympathy goes to the horse. Well, my sympathy always goes to any horse someone has felt the need to put a bit in their mouth.

    – Ed Grimm
    1 hour ago














  • 1





    There's nothing grammatically wrong with that. I might suggest using reins instead of bridles, because the reins are the particular part of the bridle that is free to lash about.

    – Canadian Yankee
    4 hours ago






  • 1





    @CanadianYankee I am not sure that reins are considered part of the bridle. When you put a horse in a pasture or stall, you may still bridle the horse, but the bridle will have neither bit nor reins. As I said, not sure.

    – Jeff Morrow
    3 hours ago











  • Dependingon the dictionary consulted, a bridle may or may not include the reins and bit. In any event, it would be the reins that would be lashing about, and any suggestion that it was either the headstall or the bit that were lashing about would indicate someone did a very poor job putting it on, or that it had suffered some form of structural failure. In either event, my sympathy goes to the horse. Well, my sympathy always goes to any horse someone has felt the need to put a bit in their mouth.

    – Ed Grimm
    1 hour ago








1




1





There's nothing grammatically wrong with that. I might suggest using reins instead of bridles, because the reins are the particular part of the bridle that is free to lash about.

– Canadian Yankee
4 hours ago





There's nothing grammatically wrong with that. I might suggest using reins instead of bridles, because the reins are the particular part of the bridle that is free to lash about.

– Canadian Yankee
4 hours ago




1




1





@CanadianYankee I am not sure that reins are considered part of the bridle. When you put a horse in a pasture or stall, you may still bridle the horse, but the bridle will have neither bit nor reins. As I said, not sure.

– Jeff Morrow
3 hours ago





@CanadianYankee I am not sure that reins are considered part of the bridle. When you put a horse in a pasture or stall, you may still bridle the horse, but the bridle will have neither bit nor reins. As I said, not sure.

– Jeff Morrow
3 hours ago













Dependingon the dictionary consulted, a bridle may or may not include the reins and bit. In any event, it would be the reins that would be lashing about, and any suggestion that it was either the headstall or the bit that were lashing about would indicate someone did a very poor job putting it on, or that it had suffered some form of structural failure. In either event, my sympathy goes to the horse. Well, my sympathy always goes to any horse someone has felt the need to put a bit in their mouth.

– Ed Grimm
1 hour ago





Dependingon the dictionary consulted, a bridle may or may not include the reins and bit. In any event, it would be the reins that would be lashing about, and any suggestion that it was either the headstall or the bit that were lashing about would indicate someone did a very poor job putting it on, or that it had suffered some form of structural failure. In either event, my sympathy goes to the horse. Well, my sympathy always goes to any horse someone has felt the need to put a bit in their mouth.

– Ed Grimm
1 hour ago










2 Answers
2






active

oldest

votes


















3














Bridles are the headgear placed on horses' heads in order to keep them controlled:



bridle



It wouldn't make any sense to say that this headgear was lashing about the horses. If it were loose in that way, it would be a serious problem.




Instead, the word you're looking for is most likely reins:




[Merriam-Webster]



: a strap fastened to a bit by which a rider or driver controls an animal —usually used in plural




In the picture, the reins are the straps that have been fastened to the horse's bridle, through a ring that's also connected to the bit in its mouth.






share|improve this answer

































    1














    I don’t know where you found your original sentence, but the way you mention prepositions and verbs makes me wonder if you’re analyzing it correctly.



    It’s not:




    The bridles were lashing [about the horses]...




    where about is a preposition; rather, about is an adverb, describing how the bridles were lashing.



    Consider this definition from Wordnik:




    about (adv.) All around; on every side: Let's look about for help.




    So, your sentence could be rephrased as:




    The bridles were lashing all around the horses as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




    One way we can tell that about is an adverb here is that we can omit the phrase “the horses” and the sentence still makes sense:




    The bridles were lashing about as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




    I’m not going to address the difference between bridles and reins as that was already discussed in another answer.






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "481"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      noCode: true, onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194499%2fis-bridles-lashing-about-the-horses-correct%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes








      2 Answers
      2






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      3














      Bridles are the headgear placed on horses' heads in order to keep them controlled:



      bridle



      It wouldn't make any sense to say that this headgear was lashing about the horses. If it were loose in that way, it would be a serious problem.




      Instead, the word you're looking for is most likely reins:




      [Merriam-Webster]



      : a strap fastened to a bit by which a rider or driver controls an animal —usually used in plural




      In the picture, the reins are the straps that have been fastened to the horse's bridle, through a ring that's also connected to the bit in its mouth.






      share|improve this answer






























        3














        Bridles are the headgear placed on horses' heads in order to keep them controlled:



        bridle



        It wouldn't make any sense to say that this headgear was lashing about the horses. If it were loose in that way, it would be a serious problem.




        Instead, the word you're looking for is most likely reins:




        [Merriam-Webster]



        : a strap fastened to a bit by which a rider or driver controls an animal —usually used in plural




        In the picture, the reins are the straps that have been fastened to the horse's bridle, through a ring that's also connected to the bit in its mouth.






        share|improve this answer




























          3












          3








          3







          Bridles are the headgear placed on horses' heads in order to keep them controlled:



          bridle



          It wouldn't make any sense to say that this headgear was lashing about the horses. If it were loose in that way, it would be a serious problem.




          Instead, the word you're looking for is most likely reins:




          [Merriam-Webster]



          : a strap fastened to a bit by which a rider or driver controls an animal —usually used in plural




          In the picture, the reins are the straps that have been fastened to the horse's bridle, through a ring that's also connected to the bit in its mouth.






          share|improve this answer















          Bridles are the headgear placed on horses' heads in order to keep them controlled:



          bridle



          It wouldn't make any sense to say that this headgear was lashing about the horses. If it were loose in that way, it would be a serious problem.




          Instead, the word you're looking for is most likely reins:




          [Merriam-Webster]



          : a strap fastened to a bit by which a rider or driver controls an animal —usually used in plural




          In the picture, the reins are the straps that have been fastened to the horse's bridle, through a ring that's also connected to the bit in its mouth.







          share|improve this answer














          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer








          edited 1 hour ago









          J.R.♦

          98.5k8127244




          98.5k8127244










          answered 4 hours ago









          Jason BassfordJason Bassford

          14.1k22136




          14.1k22136

























              1














              I don’t know where you found your original sentence, but the way you mention prepositions and verbs makes me wonder if you’re analyzing it correctly.



              It’s not:




              The bridles were lashing [about the horses]...




              where about is a preposition; rather, about is an adverb, describing how the bridles were lashing.



              Consider this definition from Wordnik:




              about (adv.) All around; on every side: Let's look about for help.




              So, your sentence could be rephrased as:




              The bridles were lashing all around the horses as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




              One way we can tell that about is an adverb here is that we can omit the phrase “the horses” and the sentence still makes sense:




              The bridles were lashing about as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




              I’m not going to address the difference between bridles and reins as that was already discussed in another answer.






              share|improve this answer




























                1














                I don’t know where you found your original sentence, but the way you mention prepositions and verbs makes me wonder if you’re analyzing it correctly.



                It’s not:




                The bridles were lashing [about the horses]...




                where about is a preposition; rather, about is an adverb, describing how the bridles were lashing.



                Consider this definition from Wordnik:




                about (adv.) All around; on every side: Let's look about for help.




                So, your sentence could be rephrased as:




                The bridles were lashing all around the horses as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




                One way we can tell that about is an adverb here is that we can omit the phrase “the horses” and the sentence still makes sense:




                The bridles were lashing about as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




                I’m not going to address the difference between bridles and reins as that was already discussed in another answer.






                share|improve this answer


























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  I don’t know where you found your original sentence, but the way you mention prepositions and verbs makes me wonder if you’re analyzing it correctly.



                  It’s not:




                  The bridles were lashing [about the horses]...




                  where about is a preposition; rather, about is an adverb, describing how the bridles were lashing.



                  Consider this definition from Wordnik:




                  about (adv.) All around; on every side: Let's look about for help.




                  So, your sentence could be rephrased as:




                  The bridles were lashing all around the horses as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




                  One way we can tell that about is an adverb here is that we can omit the phrase “the horses” and the sentence still makes sense:




                  The bridles were lashing about as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




                  I’m not going to address the difference between bridles and reins as that was already discussed in another answer.






                  share|improve this answer













                  I don’t know where you found your original sentence, but the way you mention prepositions and verbs makes me wonder if you’re analyzing it correctly.



                  It’s not:




                  The bridles were lashing [about the horses]...




                  where about is a preposition; rather, about is an adverb, describing how the bridles were lashing.



                  Consider this definition from Wordnik:




                  about (adv.) All around; on every side: Let's look about for help.




                  So, your sentence could be rephrased as:




                  The bridles were lashing all around the horses as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




                  One way we can tell that about is an adverb here is that we can omit the phrase “the horses” and the sentence still makes sense:




                  The bridles were lashing about as the horsemen were trying to escape the King's cavalry.




                  I’m not going to address the difference between bridles and reins as that was already discussed in another answer.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 1 hour ago









                  J.R.♦J.R.

                  98.5k8127244




                  98.5k8127244






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to English Language Learners Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid …



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fell.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f194499%2fis-bridles-lashing-about-the-horses-correct%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      -

                      Popular posts from this blog

                      SQL Server 17 - Attemping to backup to remote NAS but Access is denied

                      Image
                      .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0; } 0 I was attemping to use Ola Hallengrens scripts to backup to a remote NAS, but it was failing and not giving any direct errors, so I tried doing it manually using Server Management Studio and got the following error: TITLE: Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio Failed to retrieve data for this request. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Sdk.Sfc) For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft%20SQL%20Server&LinkId=20476 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. (Microsoft.SqlServer.ConnectionInfo) The operating system returned the error '0x80070005(Access is denied.)&#
                      Read more

                      Always On Availability groups resolving state after failover - Remote harden of transaction...

                      Image
                      0 My explanation will be opinion based as it is based on my findings. If more information is needed, I am always happy to add it. The setup We have 4 SQL Server 2016 Instances, and all 4 underlying servers are in a WSFC (In my eyes a strange setup since Always On AG's are 2 by 2. But that is a different question.) 4 nodes + Fileshare witness Version: 13.0.5026.0 (all nodes) The instances that are having the failover issues are instances 1 & 2. They have 3 AG's between them. AG1 is primary on instance 1 and is having the issue. AG2 and AG3 are primary on instance 2. Instances 3 and 4 have their own separate AG's (2). AG1's settings The week before Last week, after checking for long running queries (none) and the synchronization state (green accross the board) we initiated a
                      Read more

                      Restoring from pg_dump with foreign key constraints

                      Image
                      5 2 In restoring a database from a pg_dump , a number of errors are being generated and the whole table is subsequently being ignored. An example: ERROR: insert or update on table "channelproducts" violates foreign key constraint "fk_rails_dfaae373a5" DETAIL: Key (channel_id)=(1) is not present in table "channels". Interestingly enough, I've noted that all these instances are popping up because of the sequence of loading. channels is after channelproducts both alphabetically and in the file and thus I can understand why postgres complains about having to create a child without a parent. caveat: the foreign key is being generated automatically by rails 4.2: I could remove the problem at the source but that still does not really solve the problem... version: PostgreSQL
                      Read more