Prove that if the expectation value of an operator in any state is 1, the operator is Identity
$begingroup$
I want to prove that if $ langle psi | A | psi rangle = 1$ for all $ psi ,$ then $A=I .$
Let's write $A$ and $psi$ in the same basis.
$$
begin{alignat}{7}
leftlangle psi middle| A middle| psi rightrangle & ~=~ && left( sum_w alpha_w^* langle w | right) left(sum_{pq} gamma_{pq} |prangle langle q| right) left(sum_v alpha_v | v rangle right) \[5px]
& ~=~ && sum_{wvpq} alpha_w^* gamma_{pq} alpha_v langle w | p rangle langle q | v rangle \[5px]
& ~=~ && sum_{wv} alpha_w^* gamma_{wv} alpha_v
end{alignat}
$$
which is equal to $1 .$
We know that the $alpha$'s can be anything, and we need to prove that the $gamma$'s where $w = v$ are $1$ and when $w neq v$ is $0 .$
How do I proceed?
quantum-mechanics homework-and-exercises operators hilbert-space
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want to prove that if $ langle psi | A | psi rangle = 1$ for all $ psi ,$ then $A=I .$
Let's write $A$ and $psi$ in the same basis.
$$
begin{alignat}{7}
leftlangle psi middle| A middle| psi rightrangle & ~=~ && left( sum_w alpha_w^* langle w | right) left(sum_{pq} gamma_{pq} |prangle langle q| right) left(sum_v alpha_v | v rangle right) \[5px]
& ~=~ && sum_{wvpq} alpha_w^* gamma_{pq} alpha_v langle w | p rangle langle q | v rangle \[5px]
& ~=~ && sum_{wv} alpha_w^* gamma_{wv} alpha_v
end{alignat}
$$
which is equal to $1 .$
We know that the $alpha$'s can be anything, and we need to prove that the $gamma$'s where $w = v$ are $1$ and when $w neq v$ is $0 .$
How do I proceed?
quantum-mechanics homework-and-exercises operators hilbert-space
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Can we prove it in the opposite direction (i.e. contra-positive)? if $A neq I$, then $langle psi | A | psi rangle neq 1$ for some $psi$
$endgroup$
– K_inverse
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
You say the $alpha$'s can be anything but surely they need to be normalised?
$endgroup$
– jacob1729
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@jacob1729, true, they need to be normalised
$endgroup$
– Mahathi Vempati
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@MahathiVempati if $alpha$'s are normalised then one (long winded) way of writing the number 1 is $1=sum alpha^*_w delta_{wv}alpha_v$.
$endgroup$
– jacob1729
41 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I want to prove that if $ langle psi | A | psi rangle = 1$ for all $ psi ,$ then $A=I .$
Let's write $A$ and $psi$ in the same basis.
$$
begin{alignat}{7}
leftlangle psi middle| A middle| psi rightrangle & ~=~ && left( sum_w alpha_w^* langle w | right) left(sum_{pq} gamma_{pq} |prangle langle q| right) left(sum_v alpha_v | v rangle right) \[5px]
& ~=~ && sum_{wvpq} alpha_w^* gamma_{pq} alpha_v langle w | p rangle langle q | v rangle \[5px]
& ~=~ && sum_{wv} alpha_w^* gamma_{wv} alpha_v
end{alignat}
$$
which is equal to $1 .$
We know that the $alpha$'s can be anything, and we need to prove that the $gamma$'s where $w = v$ are $1$ and when $w neq v$ is $0 .$
How do I proceed?
quantum-mechanics homework-and-exercises operators hilbert-space
$endgroup$
I want to prove that if $ langle psi | A | psi rangle = 1$ for all $ psi ,$ then $A=I .$
Let's write $A$ and $psi$ in the same basis.
$$
begin{alignat}{7}
leftlangle psi middle| A middle| psi rightrangle & ~=~ && left( sum_w alpha_w^* langle w | right) left(sum_{pq} gamma_{pq} |prangle langle q| right) left(sum_v alpha_v | v rangle right) \[5px]
& ~=~ && sum_{wvpq} alpha_w^* gamma_{pq} alpha_v langle w | p rangle langle q | v rangle \[5px]
& ~=~ && sum_{wv} alpha_w^* gamma_{wv} alpha_v
end{alignat}
$$
which is equal to $1 .$
We know that the $alpha$'s can be anything, and we need to prove that the $gamma$'s where $w = v$ are $1$ and when $w neq v$ is $0 .$
How do I proceed?
quantum-mechanics homework-and-exercises operators hilbert-space
quantum-mechanics homework-and-exercises operators hilbert-space
edited 2 hours ago
Qmechanic♦
103k121851174
103k121851174
asked 4 hours ago
Mahathi VempatiMahathi Vempati
2961520
2961520
1
$begingroup$
Can we prove it in the opposite direction (i.e. contra-positive)? if $A neq I$, then $langle psi | A | psi rangle neq 1$ for some $psi$
$endgroup$
– K_inverse
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
You say the $alpha$'s can be anything but surely they need to be normalised?
$endgroup$
– jacob1729
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@jacob1729, true, they need to be normalised
$endgroup$
– Mahathi Vempati
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@MahathiVempati if $alpha$'s are normalised then one (long winded) way of writing the number 1 is $1=sum alpha^*_w delta_{wv}alpha_v$.
$endgroup$
– jacob1729
41 mins ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Can we prove it in the opposite direction (i.e. contra-positive)? if $A neq I$, then $langle psi | A | psi rangle neq 1$ for some $psi$
$endgroup$
– K_inverse
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
You say the $alpha$'s can be anything but surely they need to be normalised?
$endgroup$
– jacob1729
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@jacob1729, true, they need to be normalised
$endgroup$
– Mahathi Vempati
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@MahathiVempati if $alpha$'s are normalised then one (long winded) way of writing the number 1 is $1=sum alpha^*_w delta_{wv}alpha_v$.
$endgroup$
– jacob1729
41 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Can we prove it in the opposite direction (i.e. contra-positive)? if $A neq I$, then $langle psi | A | psi rangle neq 1$ for some $psi$
$endgroup$
– K_inverse
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Can we prove it in the opposite direction (i.e. contra-positive)? if $A neq I$, then $langle psi | A | psi rangle neq 1$ for some $psi$
$endgroup$
– K_inverse
3 hours ago
1
1
$begingroup$
You say the $alpha$'s can be anything but surely they need to be normalised?
$endgroup$
– jacob1729
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
You say the $alpha$'s can be anything but surely they need to be normalised?
$endgroup$
– jacob1729
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@jacob1729, true, they need to be normalised
$endgroup$
– Mahathi Vempati
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@jacob1729, true, they need to be normalised
$endgroup$
– Mahathi Vempati
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@MahathiVempati if $alpha$'s are normalised then one (long winded) way of writing the number 1 is $1=sum alpha^*_w delta_{wv}alpha_v$.
$endgroup$
– jacob1729
41 mins ago
$begingroup$
@MahathiVempati if $alpha$'s are normalised then one (long winded) way of writing the number 1 is $1=sum alpha^*_w delta_{wv}alpha_v$.
$endgroup$
– jacob1729
41 mins ago
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We have the freedom to expand $A$ in its eigenbasis, then
begin{equation}
A = sum_{alpha} vertalpharangle langle alphavert Avertalpharangle langle alphavert = sum_{alpha} vertalpharangle langle alphavert = 1,
end{equation}
where in the second equality we used that by assumption $langle alphavert Avertalpharangle=1$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you! Is it possible to continue my line of proof, though?
$endgroup$
– Mahathi Vempati
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "151"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f455612%2fprove-that-if-the-expectation-value-of-an-operator-in-any-state-is-1-the-operat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
We have the freedom to expand $A$ in its eigenbasis, then
begin{equation}
A = sum_{alpha} vertalpharangle langle alphavert Avertalpharangle langle alphavert = sum_{alpha} vertalpharangle langle alphavert = 1,
end{equation}
where in the second equality we used that by assumption $langle alphavert Avertalpharangle=1$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you! Is it possible to continue my line of proof, though?
$endgroup$
– Mahathi Vempati
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have the freedom to expand $A$ in its eigenbasis, then
begin{equation}
A = sum_{alpha} vertalpharangle langle alphavert Avertalpharangle langle alphavert = sum_{alpha} vertalpharangle langle alphavert = 1,
end{equation}
where in the second equality we used that by assumption $langle alphavert Avertalpharangle=1$.
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
Thank you! Is it possible to continue my line of proof, though?
$endgroup$
– Mahathi Vempati
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
We have the freedom to expand $A$ in its eigenbasis, then
begin{equation}
A = sum_{alpha} vertalpharangle langle alphavert Avertalpharangle langle alphavert = sum_{alpha} vertalpharangle langle alphavert = 1,
end{equation}
where in the second equality we used that by assumption $langle alphavert Avertalpharangle=1$.
$endgroup$
We have the freedom to expand $A$ in its eigenbasis, then
begin{equation}
A = sum_{alpha} vertalpharangle langle alphavert Avertalpharangle langle alphavert = sum_{alpha} vertalpharangle langle alphavert = 1,
end{equation}
where in the second equality we used that by assumption $langle alphavert Avertalpharangle=1$.
answered 3 hours ago
loeweloewe
350113
350113
$begingroup$
Thank you! Is it possible to continue my line of proof, though?
$endgroup$
– Mahathi Vempati
3 hours ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Thank you! Is it possible to continue my line of proof, though?
$endgroup$
– Mahathi Vempati
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you! Is it possible to continue my line of proof, though?
$endgroup$
– Mahathi Vempati
3 hours ago
$begingroup$
Thank you! Is it possible to continue my line of proof, though?
$endgroup$
– Mahathi Vempati
3 hours ago
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f455612%2fprove-that-if-the-expectation-value-of-an-operator-in-any-state-is-1-the-operat%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Can we prove it in the opposite direction (i.e. contra-positive)? if $A neq I$, then $langle psi | A | psi rangle neq 1$ for some $psi$
$endgroup$
– K_inverse
3 hours ago
1
$begingroup$
You say the $alpha$'s can be anything but surely they need to be normalised?
$endgroup$
– jacob1729
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@jacob1729, true, they need to be normalised
$endgroup$
– Mahathi Vempati
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@MahathiVempati if $alpha$'s are normalised then one (long winded) way of writing the number 1 is $1=sum alpha^*_w delta_{wv}alpha_v$.
$endgroup$
– jacob1729
41 mins ago