Why dont electromagnetic waves interact with each other?












1












$begingroup$


My exact question is that what refers to this phenomenon? I saw also richards feynman video in that he talks about light and says that if we look at something those ligh waves that come from that thing are not disturbed from any other electromagnetic waves and explains this kind of way that if i can see things clearly, in front of me, although if someone stand in the right of me, can also clearly see any thing in the left of me, our light waves cross each other but the are not disturbed by each other. This is a kinda cool explanation but i dont understand that exactly, because i am not convinced that if those two electromagnetic waves would interact then i couldnt see the thing in front of me clearly






electromagnetic-radiation







share|cite|improve this question









$endgroup$

















    1












    $begingroup$


    My exact question is that what refers to this phenomenon? I saw also richards feynman video in that he talks about light and says that if we look at something those ligh waves that come from that thing are not disturbed from any other electromagnetic waves and explains this kind of way that if i can see things clearly, in front of me, although if someone stand in the right of me, can also clearly see any thing in the left of me, our light waves cross each other but the are not disturbed by each other. This is a kinda cool explanation but i dont understand that exactly, because i am not convinced that if those two electromagnetic waves would interact then i couldnt see the thing in front of me clearly






    electromagnetic-radiation







    share|cite|improve this question









    $endgroup$















      1












      1








      1


      1



      $begingroup$


      My exact question is that what refers to this phenomenon? I saw also richards feynman video in that he talks about light and says that if we look at something those ligh waves that come from that thing are not disturbed from any other electromagnetic waves and explains this kind of way that if i can see things clearly, in front of me, although if someone stand in the right of me, can also clearly see any thing in the left of me, our light waves cross each other but the are not disturbed by each other. This is a kinda cool explanation but i dont understand that exactly, because i am not convinced that if those two electromagnetic waves would interact then i couldnt see the thing in front of me clearly






      electromagnetic-radiation







      share|cite|improve this question









      $endgroup$




      My exact question is that what refers to this phenomenon? I saw also richards feynman video in that he talks about light and says that if we look at something those ligh waves that come from that thing are not disturbed from any other electromagnetic waves and explains this kind of way that if i can see things clearly, in front of me, although if someone stand in the right of me, can also clearly see any thing in the left of me, our light waves cross each other but the are not disturbed by each other. This is a kinda cool explanation but i dont understand that exactly, because i am not convinced that if those two electromagnetic waves would interact then i couldnt see the thing in front of me clearly






      electromagnetic-radiation




      electromagnetic-radiation






      share|cite|improve this question













      share|cite|improve this question











      share|cite|improve this question




      share|cite|improve this question










      asked 1 hour ago









      Bálint TataiBálint Tatai

      23727




      23727






















          1 Answer
          1






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3












          $begingroup$

          Here are three explanations of how to understand “why” electromagnetic waves don’t directly interact electromagnetically with each other, which are all equivalent to each other:




          1. Maxwell’s equations are linear in the electric and magnetic fields, and in their sources, so the superposition of two solutions is also a solution. (For example, in Coulomb’s Law you can just add up the fields of multiple charges.)


          2. Photons do not carry any electric charge and do not have their own electromagnetic field. (Note: By contrast, gluons do carry color charge and do interact with each other.)


          3. The gauge group for electromagnetism is an abelian (i.e., commutative) group. (Gauge groups are something you learn about in more advanced physics courses.)



          Notice that I said photons don’t directly interact with each other. They do indirectly interact via virtual electrons and positrons (or other charged particle-antiparticle pairs). Until you get to extremely intense electric and magnetic fields, this is a very tiny effect and was only recently measured.



          An even tinier effect, which we will probably never be able to detect, is the gravitational interaction of electromagnetic waves or photons. Physicists believe there would be a gravitational interaction because electromagnetic waves and photons carry energy and momentum, even though photons are massless.






          share|cite|improve this answer











          $endgroup$














            Your Answer





            StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
            return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
            StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
            StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
            });
            });
            }, "mathjax-editing");

            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "151"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            noCode: true, onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });














            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f471007%2fwhy-dont-electromagnetic-waves-interact-with-each-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes








            1 Answer
            1






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3












            $begingroup$

            Here are three explanations of how to understand “why” electromagnetic waves don’t directly interact electromagnetically with each other, which are all equivalent to each other:




            1. Maxwell’s equations are linear in the electric and magnetic fields, and in their sources, so the superposition of two solutions is also a solution. (For example, in Coulomb’s Law you can just add up the fields of multiple charges.)


            2. Photons do not carry any electric charge and do not have their own electromagnetic field. (Note: By contrast, gluons do carry color charge and do interact with each other.)


            3. The gauge group for electromagnetism is an abelian (i.e., commutative) group. (Gauge groups are something you learn about in more advanced physics courses.)



            Notice that I said photons don’t directly interact with each other. They do indirectly interact via virtual electrons and positrons (or other charged particle-antiparticle pairs). Until you get to extremely intense electric and magnetic fields, this is a very tiny effect and was only recently measured.



            An even tinier effect, which we will probably never be able to detect, is the gravitational interaction of electromagnetic waves or photons. Physicists believe there would be a gravitational interaction because electromagnetic waves and photons carry energy and momentum, even though photons are massless.






            share|cite|improve this answer











            $endgroup$


















              3












              $begingroup$

              Here are three explanations of how to understand “why” electromagnetic waves don’t directly interact electromagnetically with each other, which are all equivalent to each other:




              1. Maxwell’s equations are linear in the electric and magnetic fields, and in their sources, so the superposition of two solutions is also a solution. (For example, in Coulomb’s Law you can just add up the fields of multiple charges.)


              2. Photons do not carry any electric charge and do not have their own electromagnetic field. (Note: By contrast, gluons do carry color charge and do interact with each other.)


              3. The gauge group for electromagnetism is an abelian (i.e., commutative) group. (Gauge groups are something you learn about in more advanced physics courses.)



              Notice that I said photons don’t directly interact with each other. They do indirectly interact via virtual electrons and positrons (or other charged particle-antiparticle pairs). Until you get to extremely intense electric and magnetic fields, this is a very tiny effect and was only recently measured.



              An even tinier effect, which we will probably never be able to detect, is the gravitational interaction of electromagnetic waves or photons. Physicists believe there would be a gravitational interaction because electromagnetic waves and photons carry energy and momentum, even though photons are massless.






              share|cite|improve this answer











              $endgroup$
















                3












                3








                3





                $begingroup$

                Here are three explanations of how to understand “why” electromagnetic waves don’t directly interact electromagnetically with each other, which are all equivalent to each other:




                1. Maxwell’s equations are linear in the electric and magnetic fields, and in their sources, so the superposition of two solutions is also a solution. (For example, in Coulomb’s Law you can just add up the fields of multiple charges.)


                2. Photons do not carry any electric charge and do not have their own electromagnetic field. (Note: By contrast, gluons do carry color charge and do interact with each other.)


                3. The gauge group for electromagnetism is an abelian (i.e., commutative) group. (Gauge groups are something you learn about in more advanced physics courses.)



                Notice that I said photons don’t directly interact with each other. They do indirectly interact via virtual electrons and positrons (or other charged particle-antiparticle pairs). Until you get to extremely intense electric and magnetic fields, this is a very tiny effect and was only recently measured.



                An even tinier effect, which we will probably never be able to detect, is the gravitational interaction of electromagnetic waves or photons. Physicists believe there would be a gravitational interaction because electromagnetic waves and photons carry energy and momentum, even though photons are massless.






                share|cite|improve this answer











                $endgroup$



                Here are three explanations of how to understand “why” electromagnetic waves don’t directly interact electromagnetically with each other, which are all equivalent to each other:




                1. Maxwell’s equations are linear in the electric and magnetic fields, and in their sources, so the superposition of two solutions is also a solution. (For example, in Coulomb’s Law you can just add up the fields of multiple charges.)


                2. Photons do not carry any electric charge and do not have their own electromagnetic field. (Note: By contrast, gluons do carry color charge and do interact with each other.)


                3. The gauge group for electromagnetism is an abelian (i.e., commutative) group. (Gauge groups are something you learn about in more advanced physics courses.)



                Notice that I said photons don’t directly interact with each other. They do indirectly interact via virtual electrons and positrons (or other charged particle-antiparticle pairs). Until you get to extremely intense electric and magnetic fields, this is a very tiny effect and was only recently measured.



                An even tinier effect, which we will probably never be able to detect, is the gravitational interaction of electromagnetic waves or photons. Physicists believe there would be a gravitational interaction because electromagnetic waves and photons carry energy and momentum, even though photons are massless.







                share|cite|improve this answer














                share|cite|improve this answer



                share|cite|improve this answer








                edited 39 mins ago

























                answered 1 hour ago









                G. SmithG. Smith

                10.5k11430




                10.5k11430






























                    draft saved

                    draft discarded




















































                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Physics Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid …



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fphysics.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f471007%2fwhy-dont-electromagnetic-waves-interact-with-each-other%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    -

                    Popular posts from this blog

                    SQL Server 17 - Attemping to backup to remote NAS but Access is denied

                    Image
                    .everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0; } 0 I was attemping to use Ola Hallengrens scripts to backup to a remote NAS, but it was failing and not giving any direct errors, so I tried doing it manually using Server Management Studio and got the following error: TITLE: Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio Failed to retrieve data for this request. (Microsoft.SqlServer.Management.Sdk.Sfc) For help, click: http://go.microsoft.com/fwlink?ProdName=Microsoft%20SQL%20Server&LinkId=20476 ADDITIONAL INFORMATION: An exception occurred while executing a Transact-SQL statement or batch. (Microsoft.SqlServer.ConnectionInfo) The operating system returned the error '0x80070005(Access is denied.)&#
                    Read more

                    Always On Availability groups resolving state after failover - Remote harden of transaction...

                    Image
                    0 My explanation will be opinion based as it is based on my findings. If more information is needed, I am always happy to add it. The setup We have 4 SQL Server 2016 Instances, and all 4 underlying servers are in a WSFC (In my eyes a strange setup since Always On AG's are 2 by 2. But that is a different question.) 4 nodes + Fileshare witness Version: 13.0.5026.0 (all nodes) The instances that are having the failover issues are instances 1 & 2. They have 3 AG's between them. AG1 is primary on instance 1 and is having the issue. AG2 and AG3 are primary on instance 2. Instances 3 and 4 have their own separate AG's (2). AG1's settings The week before Last week, after checking for long running queries (none) and the synchronization state (green accross the board) we initiated a
                    Read more

                    Restoring from pg_dump with foreign key constraints

                    Image
                    5 2 In restoring a database from a pg_dump , a number of errors are being generated and the whole table is subsequently being ignored. An example: ERROR: insert or update on table "channelproducts" violates foreign key constraint "fk_rails_dfaae373a5" DETAIL: Key (channel_id)=(1) is not present in table "channels". Interestingly enough, I've noted that all these instances are popping up because of the sequence of loading. channels is after channelproducts both alphabetically and in the file and thus I can understand why postgres complains about having to create a child without a parent. caveat: the foreign key is being generated automatically by rails 4.2: I could remove the problem at the source but that still does not really solve the problem... version: PostgreSQL
                    Read more