Find maximum of the output from reduce
$begingroup$
I am trying to reduce a function in two variables($n_1$ and $n_2$) whose domain is the set of Integers. I get a long list of pairs of values for these two variables(instead of a range). This could be because the range of $n_2$ changes for each $n_1$. I just want the maximum value of $n_1$ and $n_2$. Can you please guide me?
driftParamSet = 1.9 - 0.2 Subscript[n, 2] + Subscript[n, 1] (-0.2 + (2.91434*10^-16 Subscript[n, 1])/(1. Subscript[n, 1] + 1.5 Subscript[n, 2]));
drift[Gamma] = 17;
Reduce[driftParamSet> -drift[Gamma] && Subscript[n, 1]>= 0 && Subscript[n, 2]>= 0,{Subscript[n, 1],Subscript[n, 2]}, Integers];
Current output:
$n_1=0land n_2=1left|n_1=0land n_2=2right|n_1=0land n_2=3|n_1=0land n_2=4
\......\left|n_1=0land n_2=90right|n_1=0land n_2=91|\.....\
left(n_1=92land n_2=2right)lor left(n_1=93land n_2=0right)lor left(n_1=93land n_2=1right)lor left(n_1=94land n_2=0right)$
Expected output:
$n_1$=94 and $n_2=$91
equation-solving functions
asked 1 hour ago
gagansogaganso
1207
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to reduce a function in two variables($n_1$ and $n_2$) whose domain is the set of Integers. I get a long list of pairs of values for these two variables(instead of a range). This could be because the range of $n_2$ changes for each $n_1$. I just want the maximum value of $n_1$ and $n_2$. Can you please guide me?
driftParamSet = 1.9 - 0.2 Subscript[n, 2] + Subscript[n, 1] (-0.2 + (2.91434*10^-16 Subscript[n, 1])/(1. Subscript[n, 1] + 1.5 Subscript[n, 2]));
drift[Gamma] = 17;
Reduce[driftParamSet> -drift[Gamma] && Subscript[n, 1]>= 0 && Subscript[n, 2]>= 0,{Subscript[n, 1],Subscript[n, 2]}, Integers];
Current output:
$n_1=0land n_2=1left|n_1=0land n_2=2right|n_1=0land n_2=3|n_1=0land n_2=4
\......\left|n_1=0land n_2=90right|n_1=0land n_2=91|\.....\
left(n_1=92land n_2=2right)lor left(n_1=93land n_2=0right)lor left(n_1=93land n_2=1right)lor left(n_1=94land n_2=0right)$
Expected output:
$n_1$=94 and $n_2=$91
equation-solving functions
asked 1 hour ago
gagansogaganso
1207
$endgroup$
1
$begingroup$
Several symbols in your code are undefined. Please provide the definitions to aid the reader in answering your question.
$endgroup$
– bbgodfrey
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@bbgodfrey, sorry about that. I have updated the question now.
$endgroup$
– gaganso
1 hour ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
I am trying to reduce a function in two variables($n_1$ and $n_2$) whose domain is the set of Integers. I get a long list of pairs of values for these two variables(instead of a range). This could be because the range of $n_2$ changes for each $n_1$. I just want the maximum value of $n_1$ and $n_2$. Can you please guide me?
driftParamSet = 1.9 - 0.2 Subscript[n, 2] + Subscript[n, 1] (-0.2 + (2.91434*10^-16 Subscript[n, 1])/(1. Subscript[n, 1] + 1.5 Subscript[n, 2]));
drift[Gamma] = 17;
Reduce[driftParamSet> -drift[Gamma] && Subscript[n, 1]>= 0 && Subscript[n, 2]>= 0,{Subscript[n, 1],Subscript[n, 2]}, Integers];
Current output:
$n_1=0land n_2=1left|n_1=0land n_2=2right|n_1=0land n_2=3|n_1=0land n_2=4
\......\left|n_1=0land n_2=90right|n_1=0land n_2=91|\.....\
left(n_1=92land n_2=2right)lor left(n_1=93land n_2=0right)lor left(n_1=93land n_2=1right)lor left(n_1=94land n_2=0right)$
Expected output:
$n_1$=94 and $n_2=$91
equation-solving functions
asked 1 hour ago
gagansogaganso
1207
$endgroup$
I am trying to reduce a function in two variables($n_1$ and $n_2$) whose domain is the set of Integers. I get a long list of pairs of values for these two variables(instead of a range). This could be because the range of $n_2$ changes for each $n_1$. I just want the maximum value of $n_1$ and $n_2$. Can you please guide me?
driftParamSet = 1.9 - 0.2 Subscript[n, 2] + Subscript[n, 1] (-0.2 + (2.91434*10^-16 Subscript[n, 1])/(1. Subscript[n, 1] + 1.5 Subscript[n, 2]));
drift[Gamma] = 17;
Reduce[driftParamSet> -drift[Gamma] && Subscript[n, 1]>= 0 && Subscript[n, 2]>= 0,{Subscript[n, 1],Subscript[n, 2]}, Integers];
Current output:
$n_1=0land n_2=1left|n_1=0land n_2=2right|n_1=0land n_2=3|n_1=0land n_2=4
\......\left|n_1=0land n_2=90right|n_1=0land n_2=91|\.....\
left(n_1=92land n_2=2right)lor left(n_1=93land n_2=0right)lor left(n_1=93land n_2=1right)lor left(n_1=94land n_2=0right)$
Expected output:
$n_1$=94 and $n_2=$91
equation-solving functions
equation-solving functions
asked 1 hour ago
gagansogaganso
1207
asked 1 hour ago
gagansogaganso
1207
edited 1 hour ago
gaganso
asked 1 hour ago
gagansogaganso
1207
asked 1 hour ago
gagansogaganso
1207
asked 1 hour ago
gagansogaganso
1207
1207
1
$begingroup$
Several symbols in your code are undefined. Please provide the definitions to aid the reader in answering your question.
$endgroup$
– bbgodfrey
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@bbgodfrey, sorry about that. I have updated the question now.
$endgroup$
– gaganso
1 hour ago
add a comment |
1
$begingroup$
Several symbols in your code are undefined. Please provide the definitions to aid the reader in answering your question.
$endgroup$
– bbgodfrey
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@bbgodfrey, sorry about that. I have updated the question now.
$endgroup$
– gaganso
1 hour ago
1
1
$begingroup$
Several symbols in your code are undefined. Please provide the definitions to aid the reader in answering your question.
$endgroup$
– bbgodfrey
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
Several symbols in your code are undefined. Please provide the definitions to aid the reader in answering your question.
$endgroup$
– bbgodfrey
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@bbgodfrey, sorry about that. I have updated the question now.
$endgroup$
– gaganso
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@bbgodfrey, sorry about that. I have updated the question now.
$endgroup$
– gaganso
1 hour ago
add a comment |
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let the large result of Reduce be rs. Then the maximum of each quantity is determined by
Max@Cases[rs, Equal[Subscript[n, 1], z_] -> z, Infinity]
(* 94 *)
Max@Cases[rs, Equal[Subscript[n, 2], z_] -> z, Infinity]
(* 94 *)
not 91 as speculated in the question. The corresponding terms in rs can be obtained by
Position[rs, 94, Infinity]
(* {{94, 2, 2}, {4559, 1, 2}} *)
rs[[94]]
(* Subscript[n, 1] == 0 && Subscript[n, 2] == 94 *)
rs[[4559]]
(* Subscript[n, 1] == 94 && Subscript[n, 2] == 0 *)
answered 54 mins ago
bbgodfreybbgodfrey
44.8k958110
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
thank you! To understand this better, the Cases function with the specified parameter creates a list of values of n1/n2 and the Max function operates on this list to give the maximum?
$endgroup$
– gaganso
46 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
@gaganso Precisely so.
$endgroup$
– bbgodfrey
45 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
An alternative is to use Solve after Rationalizeing input expressions:
driftParamSet = Rationalize[1.9 - 0.2 n2 +
n1 (-0.2 + (2.91434*10^-16 n1)/(1. n1 + 1.5 n2)), 10^-16]
driftγ = 17;
solutions = Solve[driftParamSet > -driftγ && n1 >= 0 && n2 >= 0, {n1, n2}, Integers];
Max /@ Transpose[{n1, n2} /. solutions]
{94, 94}
Yet another approach is using ArgMax:
Extract[ArgMax[{#, driftParamSet > -driftγ && n1 >= 0 && n2 >= 0}, {n1, n2}, Integers]& /@
{n1, n2}, {{1, 1}, {-1, -1}}]
{94, 94}
answered 38 mins ago
kglrkglr
187k10203421
$endgroup$
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "387"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192764%2ffind-maximum-of-the-output-from-reduce%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
2 Answers
2
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
$begingroup$
Let the large result of Reduce be rs. Then the maximum of each quantity is determined by
Max@Cases[rs, Equal[Subscript[n, 1], z_] -> z, Infinity]
(* 94 *)
Max@Cases[rs, Equal[Subscript[n, 2], z_] -> z, Infinity]
(* 94 *)
not 91 as speculated in the question. The corresponding terms in rs can be obtained by
Position[rs, 94, Infinity]
(* {{94, 2, 2}, {4559, 1, 2}} *)
rs[[94]]
(* Subscript[n, 1] == 0 && Subscript[n, 2] == 94 *)
rs[[4559]]
(* Subscript[n, 1] == 94 && Subscript[n, 2] == 0 *)
answered 54 mins ago
bbgodfreybbgodfrey
44.8k958110
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
thank you! To understand this better, the Cases function with the specified parameter creates a list of values of n1/n2 and the Max function operates on this list to give the maximum?
$endgroup$
– gaganso
46 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
@gaganso Precisely so.
$endgroup$
– bbgodfrey
45 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let the large result of Reduce be rs. Then the maximum of each quantity is determined by
Max@Cases[rs, Equal[Subscript[n, 1], z_] -> z, Infinity]
(* 94 *)
Max@Cases[rs, Equal[Subscript[n, 2], z_] -> z, Infinity]
(* 94 *)
not 91 as speculated in the question. The corresponding terms in rs can be obtained by
Position[rs, 94, Infinity]
(* {{94, 2, 2}, {4559, 1, 2}} *)
rs[[94]]
(* Subscript[n, 1] == 0 && Subscript[n, 2] == 94 *)
rs[[4559]]
(* Subscript[n, 1] == 94 && Subscript[n, 2] == 0 *)
answered 54 mins ago
bbgodfreybbgodfrey
44.8k958110
$endgroup$
$begingroup$
thank you! To understand this better, the Cases function with the specified parameter creates a list of values of n1/n2 and the Max function operates on this list to give the maximum?
$endgroup$
– gaganso
46 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
@gaganso Precisely so.
$endgroup$
– bbgodfrey
45 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
Let the large result of Reduce be rs. Then the maximum of each quantity is determined by
Max@Cases[rs, Equal[Subscript[n, 1], z_] -> z, Infinity]
(* 94 *)
Max@Cases[rs, Equal[Subscript[n, 2], z_] -> z, Infinity]
(* 94 *)
not 91 as speculated in the question. The corresponding terms in rs can be obtained by
Position[rs, 94, Infinity]
(* {{94, 2, 2}, {4559, 1, 2}} *)
rs[[94]]
(* Subscript[n, 1] == 0 && Subscript[n, 2] == 94 *)
rs[[4559]]
(* Subscript[n, 1] == 94 && Subscript[n, 2] == 0 *)
answered 54 mins ago
bbgodfreybbgodfrey
44.8k958110
$endgroup$
Let the large result of Reduce be rs. Then the maximum of each quantity is determined by
Max@Cases[rs, Equal[Subscript[n, 1], z_] -> z, Infinity]
(* 94 *)
Max@Cases[rs, Equal[Subscript[n, 2], z_] -> z, Infinity]
(* 94 *)
not 91 as speculated in the question. The corresponding terms in rs can be obtained by
Position[rs, 94, Infinity]
(* {{94, 2, 2}, {4559, 1, 2}} *)
rs[[94]]
(* Subscript[n, 1] == 0 && Subscript[n, 2] == 94 *)
rs[[4559]]
(* Subscript[n, 1] == 94 && Subscript[n, 2] == 0 *)
answered 54 mins ago
bbgodfreybbgodfrey
44.8k958110
edited 48 mins ago
answered 54 mins ago
bbgodfreybbgodfrey
44.8k958110
answered 54 mins ago
bbgodfreybbgodfrey
44.8k958110
answered 54 mins ago
bbgodfreybbgodfrey
44.8k958110
44.8k958110
$begingroup$
thank you! To understand this better, the Cases function with the specified parameter creates a list of values of n1/n2 and the Max function operates on this list to give the maximum?
$endgroup$
– gaganso
46 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
@gaganso Precisely so.
$endgroup$
– bbgodfrey
45 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
thank you! To understand this better, the Cases function with the specified parameter creates a list of values of n1/n2 and the Max function operates on this list to give the maximum?
$endgroup$
– gaganso
46 mins ago
1
$begingroup$
@gaganso Precisely so.
$endgroup$
– bbgodfrey
45 mins ago
$begingroup$
thank you! To understand this better, the Cases function with the specified parameter creates a list of values of n1/n2 and the Max function operates on this list to give the maximum?
$endgroup$
– gaganso
46 mins ago
$begingroup$
thank you! To understand this better, the Cases function with the specified parameter creates a list of values of n1/n2 and the Max function operates on this list to give the maximum?
$endgroup$
– gaganso
46 mins ago
1
1
$begingroup$
@gaganso Precisely so.
$endgroup$
– bbgodfrey
45 mins ago
$begingroup$
@gaganso Precisely so.
$endgroup$
– bbgodfrey
45 mins ago
add a comment |
$begingroup$
An alternative is to use Solve after Rationalizeing input expressions:
driftParamSet = Rationalize[1.9 - 0.2 n2 +
n1 (-0.2 + (2.91434*10^-16 n1)/(1. n1 + 1.5 n2)), 10^-16]
driftγ = 17;
solutions = Solve[driftParamSet > -driftγ && n1 >= 0 && n2 >= 0, {n1, n2}, Integers];
Max /@ Transpose[{n1, n2} /. solutions]
{94, 94}
Yet another approach is using ArgMax:
Extract[ArgMax[{#, driftParamSet > -driftγ && n1 >= 0 && n2 >= 0}, {n1, n2}, Integers]& /@
{n1, n2}, {{1, 1}, {-1, -1}}]
{94, 94}
answered 38 mins ago
kglrkglr
187k10203421
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
An alternative is to use Solve after Rationalizeing input expressions:
driftParamSet = Rationalize[1.9 - 0.2 n2 +
n1 (-0.2 + (2.91434*10^-16 n1)/(1. n1 + 1.5 n2)), 10^-16]
driftγ = 17;
solutions = Solve[driftParamSet > -driftγ && n1 >= 0 && n2 >= 0, {n1, n2}, Integers];
Max /@ Transpose[{n1, n2} /. solutions]
{94, 94}
Yet another approach is using ArgMax:
Extract[ArgMax[{#, driftParamSet > -driftγ && n1 >= 0 && n2 >= 0}, {n1, n2}, Integers]& /@
{n1, n2}, {{1, 1}, {-1, -1}}]
{94, 94}
answered 38 mins ago
kglrkglr
187k10203421
$endgroup$
add a comment |
$begingroup$
An alternative is to use Solve after Rationalizeing input expressions:
driftParamSet = Rationalize[1.9 - 0.2 n2 +
n1 (-0.2 + (2.91434*10^-16 n1)/(1. n1 + 1.5 n2)), 10^-16]
driftγ = 17;
solutions = Solve[driftParamSet > -driftγ && n1 >= 0 && n2 >= 0, {n1, n2}, Integers];
Max /@ Transpose[{n1, n2} /. solutions]
{94, 94}
Yet another approach is using ArgMax:
Extract[ArgMax[{#, driftParamSet > -driftγ && n1 >= 0 && n2 >= 0}, {n1, n2}, Integers]& /@
{n1, n2}, {{1, 1}, {-1, -1}}]
{94, 94}
answered 38 mins ago
kglrkglr
187k10203421
$endgroup$
An alternative is to use Solve after Rationalizeing input expressions:
driftParamSet = Rationalize[1.9 - 0.2 n2 +
n1 (-0.2 + (2.91434*10^-16 n1)/(1. n1 + 1.5 n2)), 10^-16]
driftγ = 17;
solutions = Solve[driftParamSet > -driftγ && n1 >= 0 && n2 >= 0, {n1, n2}, Integers];
Max /@ Transpose[{n1, n2} /. solutions]
{94, 94}
Yet another approach is using ArgMax:
Extract[ArgMax[{#, driftParamSet > -driftγ && n1 >= 0 && n2 >= 0}, {n1, n2}, Integers]& /@
{n1, n2}, {{1, 1}, {-1, -1}}]
{94, 94}
answered 38 mins ago
kglrkglr
187k10203421
edited 7 mins ago
answered 38 mins ago
kglrkglr
187k10203421
answered 38 mins ago
kglrkglr
187k10203421
answered 38 mins ago
kglrkglr
187k10203421
187k10203421
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematica Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmathematica.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f192764%2ffind-maximum-of-the-output-from-reduce%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
1
$begingroup$
Several symbols in your code are undefined. Please provide the definitions to aid the reader in answering your question.
$endgroup$
– bbgodfrey
1 hour ago
$begingroup$
@bbgodfrey, sorry about that. I have updated the question now.
$endgroup$
– gaganso
1 hour ago