How to replace a sub query using WITH in PostgreSQL to reduce query cost












0















I am trying to get twitter data of narendramodi using below command.



SELECT b.t_id,a.profile_image,b.tweet_text,e.media_media_url,b.retweet_count,b.favorite_count as like_count,count(reply_to_status_id) as reply_count,f.imp_count,f.eng_count,f.eng_rate 
FROM twitter_users a LEFT JOIN twitter_tweets b on a.user_id=b.user_id
LEFT JOIN replies c on b.t_id = c.t_id
LEFT JOIN media e on b.t_id = e.t_id
LEFT JOIN metric_aggregates f on f.metric_timestamp=
(select max(metric_timestamp) FROM twitter_tweet_metric_aggregates g
WHERE g.t_id=f.t_id and g.t_id=b.t_id)
WHERE a.twitter_screen_name= 'narendramodi'
GROUP BY b.t_id,a.profile_image
,b.tweet_text,b.retweet_count,b.favorite_count,
e.media_media_url,f.imp_count,f.eng_count,f.eng_rate);


Query was working correctly But, in the above query I have used sub-select to get recent data of imp_counts of each tweet based on timestamp. Because of this sub-select Query_cost was huge and so it was taking more than 15min for query execution. I want to reduce that and should able to execute within 10seconds. For that reason I was trying to use WITH (CTE) expression



WITH metric_counts AS (
SELECT max(metric_timestamp),f.t_id,f.imp_count,f.eng_count,f.eng_rate
FROM metric_aggregates f LEFT JOIN tweets b on
f.t_id=b.t_id
)
SELECT
b.t_id,a.profile_image,b.tweet_text,e.media_media_url,b.retweet_count
,b.favorite_count as like_count, count(reply_to_status_id) as
reply_count,metric_counts.imp_count
,metric_counts.eng_count,metric_counts.eng_rate
FROM twitter_users as a
LEFT JOIN tweets as b on a.twitter_user_id=b.twitter_user_id
LEFT JOIN replies c on b.t_id = c.t_id
LEFT JOIN media e on b.t_id = e.t_id
LEFT JOIN metric_counts on metric_counts.t_id = b.t_id WHERE
lower(a.twitter_screen_name)=lower('narendramodi')
GROUP BY b.t_id,a.profile_image,b.tweet_text,e.media_media_url,
b.retweet_count,b.favorite_count,
metric_counts.imp_count,metric_counts.eng_count,
metric_counts.eng_rate;


The above WITH expression was giving results of imp_counts also for each tweet but not giving latest record/value. Can anyone help me in achieving this.



Here is the Query cost of WITH query



HashAggregate  (cost=1734856.13..1735618.48 rows=76235 width=673)


So can anyone help me to reduce cost to even lesser but giving results within 15 sec.










share|improve this question



























    0















    I am trying to get twitter data of narendramodi using below command.



    SELECT b.t_id,a.profile_image,b.tweet_text,e.media_media_url,b.retweet_count,b.favorite_count as like_count,count(reply_to_status_id) as reply_count,f.imp_count,f.eng_count,f.eng_rate 
    FROM twitter_users a LEFT JOIN twitter_tweets b on a.user_id=b.user_id
    LEFT JOIN replies c on b.t_id = c.t_id
    LEFT JOIN media e on b.t_id = e.t_id
    LEFT JOIN metric_aggregates f on f.metric_timestamp=
    (select max(metric_timestamp) FROM twitter_tweet_metric_aggregates g
    WHERE g.t_id=f.t_id and g.t_id=b.t_id)
    WHERE a.twitter_screen_name= 'narendramodi'
    GROUP BY b.t_id,a.profile_image
    ,b.tweet_text,b.retweet_count,b.favorite_count,
    e.media_media_url,f.imp_count,f.eng_count,f.eng_rate);


    Query was working correctly But, in the above query I have used sub-select to get recent data of imp_counts of each tweet based on timestamp. Because of this sub-select Query_cost was huge and so it was taking more than 15min for query execution. I want to reduce that and should able to execute within 10seconds. For that reason I was trying to use WITH (CTE) expression



    WITH metric_counts AS (
    SELECT max(metric_timestamp),f.t_id,f.imp_count,f.eng_count,f.eng_rate
    FROM metric_aggregates f LEFT JOIN tweets b on
    f.t_id=b.t_id
    )
    SELECT
    b.t_id,a.profile_image,b.tweet_text,e.media_media_url,b.retweet_count
    ,b.favorite_count as like_count, count(reply_to_status_id) as
    reply_count,metric_counts.imp_count
    ,metric_counts.eng_count,metric_counts.eng_rate
    FROM twitter_users as a
    LEFT JOIN tweets as b on a.twitter_user_id=b.twitter_user_id
    LEFT JOIN replies c on b.t_id = c.t_id
    LEFT JOIN media e on b.t_id = e.t_id
    LEFT JOIN metric_counts on metric_counts.t_id = b.t_id WHERE
    lower(a.twitter_screen_name)=lower('narendramodi')
    GROUP BY b.t_id,a.profile_image,b.tweet_text,e.media_media_url,
    b.retweet_count,b.favorite_count,
    metric_counts.imp_count,metric_counts.eng_count,
    metric_counts.eng_rate;


    The above WITH expression was giving results of imp_counts also for each tweet but not giving latest record/value. Can anyone help me in achieving this.



    Here is the Query cost of WITH query



    HashAggregate  (cost=1734856.13..1735618.48 rows=76235 width=673)


    So can anyone help me to reduce cost to even lesser but giving results within 15 sec.










    share|improve this question

























      0












      0








      0








      I am trying to get twitter data of narendramodi using below command.



      SELECT b.t_id,a.profile_image,b.tweet_text,e.media_media_url,b.retweet_count,b.favorite_count as like_count,count(reply_to_status_id) as reply_count,f.imp_count,f.eng_count,f.eng_rate 
      FROM twitter_users a LEFT JOIN twitter_tweets b on a.user_id=b.user_id
      LEFT JOIN replies c on b.t_id = c.t_id
      LEFT JOIN media e on b.t_id = e.t_id
      LEFT JOIN metric_aggregates f on f.metric_timestamp=
      (select max(metric_timestamp) FROM twitter_tweet_metric_aggregates g
      WHERE g.t_id=f.t_id and g.t_id=b.t_id)
      WHERE a.twitter_screen_name= 'narendramodi'
      GROUP BY b.t_id,a.profile_image
      ,b.tweet_text,b.retweet_count,b.favorite_count,
      e.media_media_url,f.imp_count,f.eng_count,f.eng_rate);


      Query was working correctly But, in the above query I have used sub-select to get recent data of imp_counts of each tweet based on timestamp. Because of this sub-select Query_cost was huge and so it was taking more than 15min for query execution. I want to reduce that and should able to execute within 10seconds. For that reason I was trying to use WITH (CTE) expression



      WITH metric_counts AS (
      SELECT max(metric_timestamp),f.t_id,f.imp_count,f.eng_count,f.eng_rate
      FROM metric_aggregates f LEFT JOIN tweets b on
      f.t_id=b.t_id
      )
      SELECT
      b.t_id,a.profile_image,b.tweet_text,e.media_media_url,b.retweet_count
      ,b.favorite_count as like_count, count(reply_to_status_id) as
      reply_count,metric_counts.imp_count
      ,metric_counts.eng_count,metric_counts.eng_rate
      FROM twitter_users as a
      LEFT JOIN tweets as b on a.twitter_user_id=b.twitter_user_id
      LEFT JOIN replies c on b.t_id = c.t_id
      LEFT JOIN media e on b.t_id = e.t_id
      LEFT JOIN metric_counts on metric_counts.t_id = b.t_id WHERE
      lower(a.twitter_screen_name)=lower('narendramodi')
      GROUP BY b.t_id,a.profile_image,b.tweet_text,e.media_media_url,
      b.retweet_count,b.favorite_count,
      metric_counts.imp_count,metric_counts.eng_count,
      metric_counts.eng_rate;


      The above WITH expression was giving results of imp_counts also for each tweet but not giving latest record/value. Can anyone help me in achieving this.



      Here is the Query cost of WITH query



      HashAggregate  (cost=1734856.13..1735618.48 rows=76235 width=673)


      So can anyone help me to reduce cost to even lesser but giving results within 15 sec.










      share|improve this question














      I am trying to get twitter data of narendramodi using below command.



      SELECT b.t_id,a.profile_image,b.tweet_text,e.media_media_url,b.retweet_count,b.favorite_count as like_count,count(reply_to_status_id) as reply_count,f.imp_count,f.eng_count,f.eng_rate 
      FROM twitter_users a LEFT JOIN twitter_tweets b on a.user_id=b.user_id
      LEFT JOIN replies c on b.t_id = c.t_id
      LEFT JOIN media e on b.t_id = e.t_id
      LEFT JOIN metric_aggregates f on f.metric_timestamp=
      (select max(metric_timestamp) FROM twitter_tweet_metric_aggregates g
      WHERE g.t_id=f.t_id and g.t_id=b.t_id)
      WHERE a.twitter_screen_name= 'narendramodi'
      GROUP BY b.t_id,a.profile_image
      ,b.tweet_text,b.retweet_count,b.favorite_count,
      e.media_media_url,f.imp_count,f.eng_count,f.eng_rate);


      Query was working correctly But, in the above query I have used sub-select to get recent data of imp_counts of each tweet based on timestamp. Because of this sub-select Query_cost was huge and so it was taking more than 15min for query execution. I want to reduce that and should able to execute within 10seconds. For that reason I was trying to use WITH (CTE) expression



      WITH metric_counts AS (
      SELECT max(metric_timestamp),f.t_id,f.imp_count,f.eng_count,f.eng_rate
      FROM metric_aggregates f LEFT JOIN tweets b on
      f.t_id=b.t_id
      )
      SELECT
      b.t_id,a.profile_image,b.tweet_text,e.media_media_url,b.retweet_count
      ,b.favorite_count as like_count, count(reply_to_status_id) as
      reply_count,metric_counts.imp_count
      ,metric_counts.eng_count,metric_counts.eng_rate
      FROM twitter_users as a
      LEFT JOIN tweets as b on a.twitter_user_id=b.twitter_user_id
      LEFT JOIN replies c on b.t_id = c.t_id
      LEFT JOIN media e on b.t_id = e.t_id
      LEFT JOIN metric_counts on metric_counts.t_id = b.t_id WHERE
      lower(a.twitter_screen_name)=lower('narendramodi')
      GROUP BY b.t_id,a.profile_image,b.tweet_text,e.media_media_url,
      b.retweet_count,b.favorite_count,
      metric_counts.imp_count,metric_counts.eng_count,
      metric_counts.eng_rate;


      The above WITH expression was giving results of imp_counts also for each tweet but not giving latest record/value. Can anyone help me in achieving this.



      Here is the Query cost of WITH query



      HashAggregate  (cost=1734856.13..1735618.48 rows=76235 width=673)


      So can anyone help me to reduce cost to even lesser but giving results within 15 sec.







      postgresql-9.4 cte






      share|improve this question













      share|improve this question











      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question










      asked 12 mins ago









      bunny sunnybunny sunny

      61




      61






















          0






          active

          oldest

          votes











          Your Answer








          StackExchange.ready(function() {
          var channelOptions = {
          tags: "".split(" "),
          id: "182"
          };
          initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

          StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
          // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
          if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
          StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
          createEditor();
          });
          }
          else {
          createEditor();
          }
          });

          function createEditor() {
          StackExchange.prepareEditor({
          heartbeatType: 'answer',
          autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
          convertImagesToLinks: false,
          noModals: true,
          showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
          reputationToPostImages: null,
          bindNavPrevention: true,
          postfix: "",
          imageUploader: {
          brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
          contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
          allowUrls: true
          },
          onDemand: true,
          discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
          ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
          });


          }
          });














          draft saved

          draft discarded


















          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f231515%2fhow-to-replace-a-sub-query-using-with-in-postgresql-to-reduce-query-cost%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown

























          0






          active

          oldest

          votes








          0






          active

          oldest

          votes









          active

          oldest

          votes






          active

          oldest

          votes
















          draft saved

          draft discarded




















































          Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


          • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

          But avoid



          • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

          • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


          To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




          draft saved


          draft discarded














          StackExchange.ready(
          function () {
          StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f231515%2fhow-to-replace-a-sub-query-using-with-in-postgresql-to-reduce-query-cost%23new-answer', 'question_page');
          }
          );

          Post as a guest















          Required, but never shown





















































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown

































          Required, but never shown














          Required, but never shown












          Required, but never shown







          Required, but never shown







          Popular posts from this blog

          الفوسفات في المغرب

          Four equal circles intersect: What is the area of the small shaded portion and its height

          بطل الاتحاد السوفيتي