Is it possible to step throuigh TSQL that uses variables, in SSMS?
If I enter TSQL into SSMS Query editor, I know I can "step through" the statements (ie. execute them one at a time) by highlighting a statement and hitting F5 on the keyboard.
It seems by default though, that session does not have an open transaction. Every execution is committed.
I can write my TSQL so that it begins with BEGIN TRAN
and ends with a COMMIT
or ROLLBACK
- and this ensures that as I step through, I have the option of backing out of changes.
However the issue I have is when I declare variables. Consider:
declare @flag bit = 0;
select case when @flag = 0 then 'off' when @flag = 1 then 'on' end as FlagCheck;
Regardless of whether the above is wrapped up in a transaction, if I run the first statement on its own, then the next statement on its own, the second statement will fail because the variable has not been declared.
Is it possible to step through code like this and have SSMS understand that the effects of the earlier statement (declaring the variable, and assigning a value) should be carried over into the next step? (Again, even if wrapped in a transaction, this persistence of variables fails - even though the persistence of the data update is dependent on the transaction resolution - commit or rollback).
sql-server t-sql ssms transaction
add a comment |
If I enter TSQL into SSMS Query editor, I know I can "step through" the statements (ie. execute them one at a time) by highlighting a statement and hitting F5 on the keyboard.
It seems by default though, that session does not have an open transaction. Every execution is committed.
I can write my TSQL so that it begins with BEGIN TRAN
and ends with a COMMIT
or ROLLBACK
- and this ensures that as I step through, I have the option of backing out of changes.
However the issue I have is when I declare variables. Consider:
declare @flag bit = 0;
select case when @flag = 0 then 'off' when @flag = 1 then 'on' end as FlagCheck;
Regardless of whether the above is wrapped up in a transaction, if I run the first statement on its own, then the next statement on its own, the second statement will fail because the variable has not been declared.
Is it possible to step through code like this and have SSMS understand that the effects of the earlier statement (declaring the variable, and assigning a value) should be carried over into the next step? (Again, even if wrapped in a transaction, this persistence of variables fails - even though the persistence of the data update is dependent on the transaction resolution - commit or rollback).
sql-server t-sql ssms transaction
add a comment |
If I enter TSQL into SSMS Query editor, I know I can "step through" the statements (ie. execute them one at a time) by highlighting a statement and hitting F5 on the keyboard.
It seems by default though, that session does not have an open transaction. Every execution is committed.
I can write my TSQL so that it begins with BEGIN TRAN
and ends with a COMMIT
or ROLLBACK
- and this ensures that as I step through, I have the option of backing out of changes.
However the issue I have is when I declare variables. Consider:
declare @flag bit = 0;
select case when @flag = 0 then 'off' when @flag = 1 then 'on' end as FlagCheck;
Regardless of whether the above is wrapped up in a transaction, if I run the first statement on its own, then the next statement on its own, the second statement will fail because the variable has not been declared.
Is it possible to step through code like this and have SSMS understand that the effects of the earlier statement (declaring the variable, and assigning a value) should be carried over into the next step? (Again, even if wrapped in a transaction, this persistence of variables fails - even though the persistence of the data update is dependent on the transaction resolution - commit or rollback).
sql-server t-sql ssms transaction
If I enter TSQL into SSMS Query editor, I know I can "step through" the statements (ie. execute them one at a time) by highlighting a statement and hitting F5 on the keyboard.
It seems by default though, that session does not have an open transaction. Every execution is committed.
I can write my TSQL so that it begins with BEGIN TRAN
and ends with a COMMIT
or ROLLBACK
- and this ensures that as I step through, I have the option of backing out of changes.
However the issue I have is when I declare variables. Consider:
declare @flag bit = 0;
select case when @flag = 0 then 'off' when @flag = 1 then 'on' end as FlagCheck;
Regardless of whether the above is wrapped up in a transaction, if I run the first statement on its own, then the next statement on its own, the second statement will fail because the variable has not been declared.
Is it possible to step through code like this and have SSMS understand that the effects of the earlier statement (declaring the variable, and assigning a value) should be carried over into the next step? (Again, even if wrapped in a transaction, this persistence of variables fails - even though the persistence of the data update is dependent on the transaction resolution - commit or rollback).
sql-server t-sql ssms transaction
sql-server t-sql ssms transaction
asked 5 mins ago
youcantryreachingmeyoucantryreachingme
2697
2697
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f229206%2fis-it-possible-to-step-throuigh-tsql-that-uses-variables-in-ssms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f229206%2fis-it-possible-to-step-throuigh-tsql-that-uses-variables-in-ssms%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown