Exempt portion of equation line from aligning?












3















I am using an array environment to get aligned portions of a series of equations to center (instead of left-justify), as shown below:



usepackage{array,amsmath}
[
begin{array}{>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r} & binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
& 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
end{array}
]


eqn1



The array environment (I believe) is necessary here to get each of the columns to center instead of justifying left.



Now my problem is that these two lines are part of a greater series of equations, where the others do not follow this pattern to be aligned. However, I need the equals signs to line up across all lines.



My current approach is follow the array with a normal align environment, having one equation line mirroring the longest line above but enclosed in phantom{} to get the align spacing right. But this leaves a single empty line with an equals in it.



...

begin{align*}
&= 2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right] \
phantom{sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}} &= phantom{ binom{n+1}{0} + binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} + binom{n+1}{n+1}}
end{align*}


eqn2



How can I get this result, but without the extraneous equals line at the end? Preferable a more elegant one, as this idea relies on several iffy factors such as none of the following equations exceeding the size of the one governing the special alignment.










share|improve this question







New contributor




PGmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    3















    I am using an array environment to get aligned portions of a series of equations to center (instead of left-justify), as shown below:



    usepackage{array,amsmath}
    [
    begin{array}{>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
    sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r} & binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
    & 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
    end{array}
    ]


    eqn1



    The array environment (I believe) is necessary here to get each of the columns to center instead of justifying left.



    Now my problem is that these two lines are part of a greater series of equations, where the others do not follow this pattern to be aligned. However, I need the equals signs to line up across all lines.



    My current approach is follow the array with a normal align environment, having one equation line mirroring the longest line above but enclosed in phantom{} to get the align spacing right. But this leaves a single empty line with an equals in it.



    ...

    begin{align*}
    &= 2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right] \
    phantom{sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}} &= phantom{ binom{n+1}{0} + binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} + binom{n+1}{n+1}}
    end{align*}


    eqn2



    How can I get this result, but without the extraneous equals line at the end? Preferable a more elegant one, as this idea relies on several iffy factors such as none of the following equations exceeding the size of the one governing the special alignment.










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    PGmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      3












      3








      3








      I am using an array environment to get aligned portions of a series of equations to center (instead of left-justify), as shown below:



      usepackage{array,amsmath}
      [
      begin{array}{>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
      sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r} & binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
      & 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
      end{array}
      ]


      eqn1



      The array environment (I believe) is necessary here to get each of the columns to center instead of justifying left.



      Now my problem is that these two lines are part of a greater series of equations, where the others do not follow this pattern to be aligned. However, I need the equals signs to line up across all lines.



      My current approach is follow the array with a normal align environment, having one equation line mirroring the longest line above but enclosed in phantom{} to get the align spacing right. But this leaves a single empty line with an equals in it.



      ...

      begin{align*}
      &= 2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right] \
      phantom{sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}} &= phantom{ binom{n+1}{0} + binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} + binom{n+1}{n+1}}
      end{align*}


      eqn2



      How can I get this result, but without the extraneous equals line at the end? Preferable a more elegant one, as this idea relies on several iffy factors such as none of the following equations exceeding the size of the one governing the special alignment.










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      PGmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      I am using an array environment to get aligned portions of a series of equations to center (instead of left-justify), as shown below:



      usepackage{array,amsmath}
      [
      begin{array}{>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
      sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r} & binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
      & 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
      end{array}
      ]


      eqn1



      The array environment (I believe) is necessary here to get each of the columns to center instead of justifying left.



      Now my problem is that these two lines are part of a greater series of equations, where the others do not follow this pattern to be aligned. However, I need the equals signs to line up across all lines.



      My current approach is follow the array with a normal align environment, having one equation line mirroring the longest line above but enclosed in phantom{} to get the align spacing right. But this leaves a single empty line with an equals in it.



      ...

      begin{align*}
      &= 2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right] \
      phantom{sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}} &= phantom{ binom{n+1}{0} + binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} + binom{n+1}{n+1}}
      end{align*}


      eqn2



      How can I get this result, but without the extraneous equals line at the end? Preferable a more elegant one, as this idea relies on several iffy factors such as none of the following equations exceeding the size of the one governing the special alignment.







      math-mode horizontal-alignment align arrays






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      PGmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      PGmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      PGmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 35 mins ago









      PGmathPGmath

      1162




      1162




      New contributor




      PGmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      PGmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      PGmath is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          3 Answers
          3






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          1














          try



          documentclass{article}
          usepackage{array,amsmath}
          begin{document}
          [
          begin{array}{>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
          sum_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
          & binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
          & 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
          & multicolumn{3}{>{displaystyle}l}{
          2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right]
          }
          end{array}
          ]
          end{document}


          enter image description here






          share|improve this answer































            1














            Use the [t] option. Then you do not need to use multicolumn many times if you have many subsequent lines.



            documentclass{article}
            usepackage{array,amsmath}
            begin{document}
            begin{align*}
            sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
            &begin{array}[t]{@{}>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}}@{}>{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
            & binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
            & 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
            end{array}\
            &=2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right]
            end{align*}
            end{document}


            enter image description here






            share|improve this answer


























            • I like this approach better but I see it misses the equals on the 2nd line.

              – PGmath
              15 mins ago













            • @PGmath Very good catch! My bad. I updated.

              – marmot
              11 mins ago



















            1














            eqparbox allows you to store the lengths of boxes via a <tag>. Boxes with the same <tag> are set with the maximum width across all content. Below I use this approach with a newly-defined eqmathbox[<tag>][<align>] (default for <align> is to centre the content) to add content to three different <tag>ged boxes:



            enter image description here



            documentclass{article}

            usepackage{eqparbox,xparse,amsmath}

            % https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/34412/5764
            makeatletter
            NewDocumentCommand{eqmathbox}{o O{c} m}{%
            IfValueTF{#1}
            {defeqmathbox@##1##2{eqmakebox[#1][#2]{$##1##2$}}}
            {defeqmathbox@##1##2{eqmakebox{$##1##2$}}}
            mathpaletteeqmathbox@{#3}
            }
            makeatother

            begin{document}

            begin{align*}
            sum_{r = 0}^{n + 1} binom{n + 1}{r}
            &= eqmathbox[LEFT]{binom{n + 1}{0}} + eqmathbox[CENTRE]{binom{n + 1}{1} + dots + binom{n + 1}{n}} + eqmathbox[RIGHT]{binom{n + 1}{n + 1}} \
            &= eqmathbox[LEFT]{1} + eqmathbox[CENTRE]{sum_{r = 1}^n binom{n + 1}{r}} + eqmathbox[RIGHT]{1} \
            &= 2 + sum_{r = 1}^n biggl[ binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r - 1} biggr]
            end{align*}

            end{document}


            Since eqparbox uses TeX's label-ref system, you need to compile twice for every change in the content of the maximum width.






            share|improve this answer

























              Your Answer








              StackExchange.ready(function() {
              var channelOptions = {
              tags: "".split(" "),
              id: "85"
              };
              initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

              StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
              // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
              if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
              StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
              createEditor();
              });
              }
              else {
              createEditor();
              }
              });

              function createEditor() {
              StackExchange.prepareEditor({
              heartbeatType: 'answer',
              autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
              convertImagesToLinks: false,
              noModals: true,
              showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
              reputationToPostImages: null,
              bindNavPrevention: true,
              postfix: "",
              imageUploader: {
              brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
              contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
              allowUrls: true
              },
              onDemand: true,
              discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
              ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
              });


              }
              });






              PGmath is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










              draft saved

              draft discarded


















              StackExchange.ready(
              function () {
              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478527%2fexempt-portion-of-equation-line-from-aligning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
              }
              );

              Post as a guest















              Required, but never shown

























              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes








              3 Answers
              3






              active

              oldest

              votes









              active

              oldest

              votes






              active

              oldest

              votes









              1














              try



              documentclass{article}
              usepackage{array,amsmath}
              begin{document}
              [
              begin{array}{>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
              sum_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
              & binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
              & 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
              & multicolumn{3}{>{displaystyle}l}{
              2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right]
              }
              end{array}
              ]
              end{document}


              enter image description here






              share|improve this answer




























                1














                try



                documentclass{article}
                usepackage{array,amsmath}
                begin{document}
                [
                begin{array}{>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
                sum_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
                & binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
                & 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
                & multicolumn{3}{>{displaystyle}l}{
                2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right]
                }
                end{array}
                ]
                end{document}


                enter image description here






                share|improve this answer


























                  1












                  1








                  1







                  try



                  documentclass{article}
                  usepackage{array,amsmath}
                  begin{document}
                  [
                  begin{array}{>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
                  sum_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
                  & binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
                  & 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
                  & multicolumn{3}{>{displaystyle}l}{
                  2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right]
                  }
                  end{array}
                  ]
                  end{document}


                  enter image description here






                  share|improve this answer













                  try



                  documentclass{article}
                  usepackage{array,amsmath}
                  begin{document}
                  [
                  begin{array}{>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
                  sum_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
                  & binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
                  & 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
                  & multicolumn{3}{>{displaystyle}l}{
                  2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right]
                  }
                  end{array}
                  ]
                  end{document}


                  enter image description here







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered 24 mins ago









                  ZarkoZarko

                  126k868165




                  126k868165























                      1














                      Use the [t] option. Then you do not need to use multicolumn many times if you have many subsequent lines.



                      documentclass{article}
                      usepackage{array,amsmath}
                      begin{document}
                      begin{align*}
                      sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
                      &begin{array}[t]{@{}>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}}@{}>{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
                      & binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
                      & 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
                      end{array}\
                      &=2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right]
                      end{align*}
                      end{document}


                      enter image description here






                      share|improve this answer


























                      • I like this approach better but I see it misses the equals on the 2nd line.

                        – PGmath
                        15 mins ago













                      • @PGmath Very good catch! My bad. I updated.

                        – marmot
                        11 mins ago
















                      1














                      Use the [t] option. Then you do not need to use multicolumn many times if you have many subsequent lines.



                      documentclass{article}
                      usepackage{array,amsmath}
                      begin{document}
                      begin{align*}
                      sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
                      &begin{array}[t]{@{}>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}}@{}>{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
                      & binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
                      & 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
                      end{array}\
                      &=2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right]
                      end{align*}
                      end{document}


                      enter image description here






                      share|improve this answer


























                      • I like this approach better but I see it misses the equals on the 2nd line.

                        – PGmath
                        15 mins ago













                      • @PGmath Very good catch! My bad. I updated.

                        – marmot
                        11 mins ago














                      1












                      1








                      1







                      Use the [t] option. Then you do not need to use multicolumn many times if you have many subsequent lines.



                      documentclass{article}
                      usepackage{array,amsmath}
                      begin{document}
                      begin{align*}
                      sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
                      &begin{array}[t]{@{}>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}}@{}>{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
                      & binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
                      & 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
                      end{array}\
                      &=2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right]
                      end{align*}
                      end{document}


                      enter image description here






                      share|improve this answer















                      Use the [t] option. Then you do not need to use multicolumn many times if you have many subsequent lines.



                      documentclass{article}
                      usepackage{array,amsmath}
                      begin{document}
                      begin{align*}
                      sumlimits_{r=0}^{n+1} binom{n+1}{r}
                      &begin{array}[t]{@{}>{displaystyle}c @{{}={}}@{}>{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c @{{}+{}} >{displaystyle}c}
                      & binom{n+1}{0} & binom{n+1}{1} + ldots + binom{n+1}{n} & binom{n+1}{n+1} \
                      & 1 & sumlimits_{r=1}^n binom{n+1}{r} & 1 \
                      end{array}\
                      &=2 + sum_{r=1}^nleft[binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r-1}right]
                      end{align*}
                      end{document}


                      enter image description here







                      share|improve this answer














                      share|improve this answer



                      share|improve this answer








                      edited 12 mins ago

























                      answered 18 mins ago









                      marmotmarmot

                      107k5129243




                      107k5129243













                      • I like this approach better but I see it misses the equals on the 2nd line.

                        – PGmath
                        15 mins ago













                      • @PGmath Very good catch! My bad. I updated.

                        – marmot
                        11 mins ago



















                      • I like this approach better but I see it misses the equals on the 2nd line.

                        – PGmath
                        15 mins ago













                      • @PGmath Very good catch! My bad. I updated.

                        – marmot
                        11 mins ago

















                      I like this approach better but I see it misses the equals on the 2nd line.

                      – PGmath
                      15 mins ago







                      I like this approach better but I see it misses the equals on the 2nd line.

                      – PGmath
                      15 mins ago















                      @PGmath Very good catch! My bad. I updated.

                      – marmot
                      11 mins ago





                      @PGmath Very good catch! My bad. I updated.

                      – marmot
                      11 mins ago











                      1














                      eqparbox allows you to store the lengths of boxes via a <tag>. Boxes with the same <tag> are set with the maximum width across all content. Below I use this approach with a newly-defined eqmathbox[<tag>][<align>] (default for <align> is to centre the content) to add content to three different <tag>ged boxes:



                      enter image description here



                      documentclass{article}

                      usepackage{eqparbox,xparse,amsmath}

                      % https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/34412/5764
                      makeatletter
                      NewDocumentCommand{eqmathbox}{o O{c} m}{%
                      IfValueTF{#1}
                      {defeqmathbox@##1##2{eqmakebox[#1][#2]{$##1##2$}}}
                      {defeqmathbox@##1##2{eqmakebox{$##1##2$}}}
                      mathpaletteeqmathbox@{#3}
                      }
                      makeatother

                      begin{document}

                      begin{align*}
                      sum_{r = 0}^{n + 1} binom{n + 1}{r}
                      &= eqmathbox[LEFT]{binom{n + 1}{0}} + eqmathbox[CENTRE]{binom{n + 1}{1} + dots + binom{n + 1}{n}} + eqmathbox[RIGHT]{binom{n + 1}{n + 1}} \
                      &= eqmathbox[LEFT]{1} + eqmathbox[CENTRE]{sum_{r = 1}^n binom{n + 1}{r}} + eqmathbox[RIGHT]{1} \
                      &= 2 + sum_{r = 1}^n biggl[ binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r - 1} biggr]
                      end{align*}

                      end{document}


                      Since eqparbox uses TeX's label-ref system, you need to compile twice for every change in the content of the maximum width.






                      share|improve this answer






























                        1














                        eqparbox allows you to store the lengths of boxes via a <tag>. Boxes with the same <tag> are set with the maximum width across all content. Below I use this approach with a newly-defined eqmathbox[<tag>][<align>] (default for <align> is to centre the content) to add content to three different <tag>ged boxes:



                        enter image description here



                        documentclass{article}

                        usepackage{eqparbox,xparse,amsmath}

                        % https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/34412/5764
                        makeatletter
                        NewDocumentCommand{eqmathbox}{o O{c} m}{%
                        IfValueTF{#1}
                        {defeqmathbox@##1##2{eqmakebox[#1][#2]{$##1##2$}}}
                        {defeqmathbox@##1##2{eqmakebox{$##1##2$}}}
                        mathpaletteeqmathbox@{#3}
                        }
                        makeatother

                        begin{document}

                        begin{align*}
                        sum_{r = 0}^{n + 1} binom{n + 1}{r}
                        &= eqmathbox[LEFT]{binom{n + 1}{0}} + eqmathbox[CENTRE]{binom{n + 1}{1} + dots + binom{n + 1}{n}} + eqmathbox[RIGHT]{binom{n + 1}{n + 1}} \
                        &= eqmathbox[LEFT]{1} + eqmathbox[CENTRE]{sum_{r = 1}^n binom{n + 1}{r}} + eqmathbox[RIGHT]{1} \
                        &= 2 + sum_{r = 1}^n biggl[ binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r - 1} biggr]
                        end{align*}

                        end{document}


                        Since eqparbox uses TeX's label-ref system, you need to compile twice for every change in the content of the maximum width.






                        share|improve this answer




























                          1












                          1








                          1







                          eqparbox allows you to store the lengths of boxes via a <tag>. Boxes with the same <tag> are set with the maximum width across all content. Below I use this approach with a newly-defined eqmathbox[<tag>][<align>] (default for <align> is to centre the content) to add content to three different <tag>ged boxes:



                          enter image description here



                          documentclass{article}

                          usepackage{eqparbox,xparse,amsmath}

                          % https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/34412/5764
                          makeatletter
                          NewDocumentCommand{eqmathbox}{o O{c} m}{%
                          IfValueTF{#1}
                          {defeqmathbox@##1##2{eqmakebox[#1][#2]{$##1##2$}}}
                          {defeqmathbox@##1##2{eqmakebox{$##1##2$}}}
                          mathpaletteeqmathbox@{#3}
                          }
                          makeatother

                          begin{document}

                          begin{align*}
                          sum_{r = 0}^{n + 1} binom{n + 1}{r}
                          &= eqmathbox[LEFT]{binom{n + 1}{0}} + eqmathbox[CENTRE]{binom{n + 1}{1} + dots + binom{n + 1}{n}} + eqmathbox[RIGHT]{binom{n + 1}{n + 1}} \
                          &= eqmathbox[LEFT]{1} + eqmathbox[CENTRE]{sum_{r = 1}^n binom{n + 1}{r}} + eqmathbox[RIGHT]{1} \
                          &= 2 + sum_{r = 1}^n biggl[ binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r - 1} biggr]
                          end{align*}

                          end{document}


                          Since eqparbox uses TeX's label-ref system, you need to compile twice for every change in the content of the maximum width.






                          share|improve this answer















                          eqparbox allows you to store the lengths of boxes via a <tag>. Boxes with the same <tag> are set with the maximum width across all content. Below I use this approach with a newly-defined eqmathbox[<tag>][<align>] (default for <align> is to centre the content) to add content to three different <tag>ged boxes:



                          enter image description here



                          documentclass{article}

                          usepackage{eqparbox,xparse,amsmath}

                          % https://tex.stackexchange.com/a/34412/5764
                          makeatletter
                          NewDocumentCommand{eqmathbox}{o O{c} m}{%
                          IfValueTF{#1}
                          {defeqmathbox@##1##2{eqmakebox[#1][#2]{$##1##2$}}}
                          {defeqmathbox@##1##2{eqmakebox{$##1##2$}}}
                          mathpaletteeqmathbox@{#3}
                          }
                          makeatother

                          begin{document}

                          begin{align*}
                          sum_{r = 0}^{n + 1} binom{n + 1}{r}
                          &= eqmathbox[LEFT]{binom{n + 1}{0}} + eqmathbox[CENTRE]{binom{n + 1}{1} + dots + binom{n + 1}{n}} + eqmathbox[RIGHT]{binom{n + 1}{n + 1}} \
                          &= eqmathbox[LEFT]{1} + eqmathbox[CENTRE]{sum_{r = 1}^n binom{n + 1}{r}} + eqmathbox[RIGHT]{1} \
                          &= 2 + sum_{r = 1}^n biggl[ binom{n}{r} + binom{n}{r - 1} biggr]
                          end{align*}

                          end{document}


                          Since eqparbox uses TeX's label-ref system, you need to compile twice for every change in the content of the maximum width.







                          share|improve this answer














                          share|improve this answer



                          share|improve this answer








                          edited 28 secs ago

























                          answered 11 mins ago









                          WernerWerner

                          446k699871692




                          446k699871692






















                              PGmath is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                              draft saved

                              draft discarded


















                              PGmath is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                              PGmath is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                              PGmath is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                              Thanks for contributing an answer to TeX - LaTeX Stack Exchange!


                              • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                              But avoid



                              • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                              • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                              To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                              draft saved


                              draft discarded














                              StackExchange.ready(
                              function () {
                              StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2ftex.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f478527%2fexempt-portion-of-equation-line-from-aligning%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                              }
                              );

                              Post as a guest















                              Required, but never shown





















































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown

































                              Required, but never shown














                              Required, but never shown












                              Required, but never shown







                              Required, but never shown







                              Popular posts from this blog

                              SQL Server 17 - Attemping to backup to remote NAS but Access is denied

                              Always On Availability groups resolving state after failover - Remote harden of transaction...

                              Restoring from pg_dump with foreign key constraints