Using TDE and SQL Server 2016 AlwaysOn Availability Groups
We currently use SQL Server 2012 AG are in process of migrating to SQL 2016. We use EMC SAN for storage and it provides the data encryption at rest on hardware level. Some folks are thinking about start using TDE that also provides encryption at rest only that we already have.
While it's not so difficult to implement TDE, it, in my opinion, creates a lot headache in terms of managing and administrating. From your experience, is it good idea to use TDE in our situation? Is it worth? How well TDE compatible with AlwaysOn AGs? I read, for example, you can't use AG GUI to do anything. Everything has to be done through scripts.
sql-server sql-server-2016 availability-groups transparent-data-encryption
edited Mar 1 '18 at 4:44
Paul White♦
53.1k14282457
asked Feb 28 '18 at 22:34
user145809user145809
1
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 4 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
We currently use SQL Server 2012 AG are in process of migrating to SQL 2016. We use EMC SAN for storage and it provides the data encryption at rest on hardware level. Some folks are thinking about start using TDE that also provides encryption at rest only that we already have.
While it's not so difficult to implement TDE, it, in my opinion, creates a lot headache in terms of managing and administrating. From your experience, is it good idea to use TDE in our situation? Is it worth? How well TDE compatible with AlwaysOn AGs? I read, for example, you can't use AG GUI to do anything. Everything has to be done through scripts.
sql-server sql-server-2016 availability-groups transparent-data-encryption
edited Mar 1 '18 at 4:44
Paul White♦
53.1k14282457
asked Feb 28 '18 at 22:34
user145809user145809
1
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 4 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
We currently use SQL Server 2012 AG are in process of migrating to SQL 2016. We use EMC SAN for storage and it provides the data encryption at rest on hardware level. Some folks are thinking about start using TDE that also provides encryption at rest only that we already have.
While it's not so difficult to implement TDE, it, in my opinion, creates a lot headache in terms of managing and administrating. From your experience, is it good idea to use TDE in our situation? Is it worth? How well TDE compatible with AlwaysOn AGs? I read, for example, you can't use AG GUI to do anything. Everything has to be done through scripts.
sql-server sql-server-2016 availability-groups transparent-data-encryption
edited Mar 1 '18 at 4:44
Paul White♦
53.1k14282457
asked Feb 28 '18 at 22:34
user145809user145809
1
We currently use SQL Server 2012 AG are in process of migrating to SQL 2016. We use EMC SAN for storage and it provides the data encryption at rest on hardware level. Some folks are thinking about start using TDE that also provides encryption at rest only that we already have.
While it's not so difficult to implement TDE, it, in my opinion, creates a lot headache in terms of managing and administrating. From your experience, is it good idea to use TDE in our situation? Is it worth? How well TDE compatible with AlwaysOn AGs? I read, for example, you can't use AG GUI to do anything. Everything has to be done through scripts.
sql-server sql-server-2016 availability-groups transparent-data-encryption
sql-server sql-server-2016 availability-groups transparent-data-encryption
edited Mar 1 '18 at 4:44
Paul White♦
53.1k14282457
asked Feb 28 '18 at 22:34
user145809user145809
1
edited Mar 1 '18 at 4:44
Paul White♦
53.1k14282457
asked Feb 28 '18 at 22:34
user145809user145809
1
edited Mar 1 '18 at 4:44
Paul White♦
53.1k14282457
edited Mar 1 '18 at 4:44
Paul White♦
53.1k14282457
edited Mar 1 '18 at 4:44
Paul White♦
53.1k14282457
53.1k14282457
asked Feb 28 '18 at 22:34
user145809user145809
1
asked Feb 28 '18 at 22:34
user145809user145809
1
asked Feb 28 '18 at 22:34
user145809user145809
1
1
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 4 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
bumped to the homepage by Community♦ 4 mins ago
This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
add a comment |
add a comment |
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
From your experience, is it good idea to use TDE in our situation?
No idea, you didn't tell us the attack vectors you are looking to secure. In the rest of my answers, I'll assume the only attack vector is on disk at rest.
Is it worth?
If you're already running Enterprise Edition (which is required) then there is no direct extra cost. There will obviously admin cost for it in terms of your working hours.
How well TDE compatible with AlwaysOn AGs?
It's 100% compatible.
We use EMC SAN for storage and it provides the data encryption at rest on hardware level.
What happens when the backups, data files, etc., are moved off the SAN? What about backups in transit over network?
I read, for example, you can't use AG GUI to do anything.
In older versions of SSMS, that's correct. This has been fixed for a while.
Everything has to be done through scripts.
I don't see why that's a bad thing, though.
answered Mar 2 '18 at 0:58
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
16.6k22654
add a comment |
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f199088%2fusing-tde-and-sql-server-2016-alwayson-availability-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
1 Answer
1
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
From your experience, is it good idea to use TDE in our situation?
No idea, you didn't tell us the attack vectors you are looking to secure. In the rest of my answers, I'll assume the only attack vector is on disk at rest.
Is it worth?
If you're already running Enterprise Edition (which is required) then there is no direct extra cost. There will obviously admin cost for it in terms of your working hours.
How well TDE compatible with AlwaysOn AGs?
It's 100% compatible.
We use EMC SAN for storage and it provides the data encryption at rest on hardware level.
What happens when the backups, data files, etc., are moved off the SAN? What about backups in transit over network?
I read, for example, you can't use AG GUI to do anything.
In older versions of SSMS, that's correct. This has been fixed for a while.
Everything has to be done through scripts.
I don't see why that's a bad thing, though.
answered Mar 2 '18 at 0:58
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
16.6k22654
add a comment |
From your experience, is it good idea to use TDE in our situation?
No idea, you didn't tell us the attack vectors you are looking to secure. In the rest of my answers, I'll assume the only attack vector is on disk at rest.
Is it worth?
If you're already running Enterprise Edition (which is required) then there is no direct extra cost. There will obviously admin cost for it in terms of your working hours.
How well TDE compatible with AlwaysOn AGs?
It's 100% compatible.
We use EMC SAN for storage and it provides the data encryption at rest on hardware level.
What happens when the backups, data files, etc., are moved off the SAN? What about backups in transit over network?
I read, for example, you can't use AG GUI to do anything.
In older versions of SSMS, that's correct. This has been fixed for a while.
Everything has to be done through scripts.
I don't see why that's a bad thing, though.
answered Mar 2 '18 at 0:58
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
16.6k22654
add a comment |
From your experience, is it good idea to use TDE in our situation?
No idea, you didn't tell us the attack vectors you are looking to secure. In the rest of my answers, I'll assume the only attack vector is on disk at rest.
Is it worth?
If you're already running Enterprise Edition (which is required) then there is no direct extra cost. There will obviously admin cost for it in terms of your working hours.
How well TDE compatible with AlwaysOn AGs?
It's 100% compatible.
We use EMC SAN for storage and it provides the data encryption at rest on hardware level.
What happens when the backups, data files, etc., are moved off the SAN? What about backups in transit over network?
I read, for example, you can't use AG GUI to do anything.
In older versions of SSMS, that's correct. This has been fixed for a while.
Everything has to be done through scripts.
I don't see why that's a bad thing, though.
answered Mar 2 '18 at 0:58
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
16.6k22654
From your experience, is it good idea to use TDE in our situation?
No idea, you didn't tell us the attack vectors you are looking to secure. In the rest of my answers, I'll assume the only attack vector is on disk at rest.
Is it worth?
If you're already running Enterprise Edition (which is required) then there is no direct extra cost. There will obviously admin cost for it in terms of your working hours.
How well TDE compatible with AlwaysOn AGs?
It's 100% compatible.
We use EMC SAN for storage and it provides the data encryption at rest on hardware level.
What happens when the backups, data files, etc., are moved off the SAN? What about backups in transit over network?
I read, for example, you can't use AG GUI to do anything.
In older versions of SSMS, that's correct. This has been fixed for a while.
Everything has to be done through scripts.
I don't see why that's a bad thing, though.
answered Mar 2 '18 at 0:58
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
16.6k22654
answered Mar 2 '18 at 0:58
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
16.6k22654
answered Mar 2 '18 at 0:58
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
16.6k22654
answered Mar 2 '18 at 0:58
Sean GallardySean Gallardy
16.6k22654
16.6k22654
add a comment |
add a comment |
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f199088%2fusing-tde-and-sql-server-2016-alwayson-availability-groups%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
