Proving a cosine inequality












5












$begingroup$


Given $0 < Theta < frac{pi}{2}$, $0 < p < 1$, show that $$cos^p{Theta} le cos{pTheta}$$



Can you please check if my proof is correct? Would also love to know if there're other ways of proving this.



Proof. Let $$f(Theta) = frac{cos^p{Theta}}{cos{pTheta}}$$considering $p$ fixed. The derivative is



$$f'(Theta) = frac{p*cos^{p-1}{Theta}*{(-sin{Theta})*cos{pTheta} -cos^p{Theta}*(-sin{pTheta}*p) } } {cos^2{pTheta}} = frac{p*cos^{p-1}{Theta}*sin{(p-1)Theta}}{cos^2{pTheta}}$$



We have $f(0)=1$, and because $0<p<1$, the term $sin(p-1)Theta$ makes the derivative negative: $f'(Theta) < 0$ on $(0,frac{pi}{2})$.



At $0$ we have $f'(0)=0$, so we cannot immediately deduce that $f$ is decreasing on all of $[0,frac{pi}{2})$.



However, considering that $f(0)=1, f(frac{pi}{2})=0$, and both $f$ and $f'$ are continuous on $[0,frac{pi}{2})$, if it were the case that $f$ rises above $1$ at some $Theta in (0,frac{pi}{2})$, $f$ would have to have a local maximum somewhere in $(0,frac{pi}{2})$, with the derivative vanishing at that point, which cannot happen. Therefore $f(Theta) le 1$ throughout $[0,frac{pi}{2}]$, Q.E.D.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    if it were the case that $f$ rises above $1$ at some $Theta in (0,frac{pi}{2})$, $f$ would have to have a local maximum somewhere in $(0,frac{pi}{2})$. Why???
    $endgroup$
    – Riemann
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    As a continuous function on a compact interval $[0,frac{pi}{2}]$, $f$ must assume its maximum value somewhere in the interval (Extreme Value Theorem); if $f(Theta)>1$ somewhere in $(0,frac{pi}{2})$, then that maximum must lie within $(0, frac{pi}{2})$ because the values on the borders are 0 and 1.
    $endgroup$
    – AnatolyVorobey
    1 hour ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it is right.
    $endgroup$
    – Riemann
    1 hour ago
















5












$begingroup$


Given $0 < Theta < frac{pi}{2}$, $0 < p < 1$, show that $$cos^p{Theta} le cos{pTheta}$$



Can you please check if my proof is correct? Would also love to know if there're other ways of proving this.



Proof. Let $$f(Theta) = frac{cos^p{Theta}}{cos{pTheta}}$$considering $p$ fixed. The derivative is



$$f'(Theta) = frac{p*cos^{p-1}{Theta}*{(-sin{Theta})*cos{pTheta} -cos^p{Theta}*(-sin{pTheta}*p) } } {cos^2{pTheta}} = frac{p*cos^{p-1}{Theta}*sin{(p-1)Theta}}{cos^2{pTheta}}$$



We have $f(0)=1$, and because $0<p<1$, the term $sin(p-1)Theta$ makes the derivative negative: $f'(Theta) < 0$ on $(0,frac{pi}{2})$.



At $0$ we have $f'(0)=0$, so we cannot immediately deduce that $f$ is decreasing on all of $[0,frac{pi}{2})$.



However, considering that $f(0)=1, f(frac{pi}{2})=0$, and both $f$ and $f'$ are continuous on $[0,frac{pi}{2})$, if it were the case that $f$ rises above $1$ at some $Theta in (0,frac{pi}{2})$, $f$ would have to have a local maximum somewhere in $(0,frac{pi}{2})$, with the derivative vanishing at that point, which cannot happen. Therefore $f(Theta) le 1$ throughout $[0,frac{pi}{2}]$, Q.E.D.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$












  • $begingroup$
    if it were the case that $f$ rises above $1$ at some $Theta in (0,frac{pi}{2})$, $f$ would have to have a local maximum somewhere in $(0,frac{pi}{2})$. Why???
    $endgroup$
    – Riemann
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    As a continuous function on a compact interval $[0,frac{pi}{2}]$, $f$ must assume its maximum value somewhere in the interval (Extreme Value Theorem); if $f(Theta)>1$ somewhere in $(0,frac{pi}{2})$, then that maximum must lie within $(0, frac{pi}{2})$ because the values on the borders are 0 and 1.
    $endgroup$
    – AnatolyVorobey
    1 hour ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it is right.
    $endgroup$
    – Riemann
    1 hour ago














5












5








5





$begingroup$


Given $0 < Theta < frac{pi}{2}$, $0 < p < 1$, show that $$cos^p{Theta} le cos{pTheta}$$



Can you please check if my proof is correct? Would also love to know if there're other ways of proving this.



Proof. Let $$f(Theta) = frac{cos^p{Theta}}{cos{pTheta}}$$considering $p$ fixed. The derivative is



$$f'(Theta) = frac{p*cos^{p-1}{Theta}*{(-sin{Theta})*cos{pTheta} -cos^p{Theta}*(-sin{pTheta}*p) } } {cos^2{pTheta}} = frac{p*cos^{p-1}{Theta}*sin{(p-1)Theta}}{cos^2{pTheta}}$$



We have $f(0)=1$, and because $0<p<1$, the term $sin(p-1)Theta$ makes the derivative negative: $f'(Theta) < 0$ on $(0,frac{pi}{2})$.



At $0$ we have $f'(0)=0$, so we cannot immediately deduce that $f$ is decreasing on all of $[0,frac{pi}{2})$.



However, considering that $f(0)=1, f(frac{pi}{2})=0$, and both $f$ and $f'$ are continuous on $[0,frac{pi}{2})$, if it were the case that $f$ rises above $1$ at some $Theta in (0,frac{pi}{2})$, $f$ would have to have a local maximum somewhere in $(0,frac{pi}{2})$, with the derivative vanishing at that point, which cannot happen. Therefore $f(Theta) le 1$ throughout $[0,frac{pi}{2}]$, Q.E.D.










share|cite|improve this question











$endgroup$




Given $0 < Theta < frac{pi}{2}$, $0 < p < 1$, show that $$cos^p{Theta} le cos{pTheta}$$



Can you please check if my proof is correct? Would also love to know if there're other ways of proving this.



Proof. Let $$f(Theta) = frac{cos^p{Theta}}{cos{pTheta}}$$considering $p$ fixed. The derivative is



$$f'(Theta) = frac{p*cos^{p-1}{Theta}*{(-sin{Theta})*cos{pTheta} -cos^p{Theta}*(-sin{pTheta}*p) } } {cos^2{pTheta}} = frac{p*cos^{p-1}{Theta}*sin{(p-1)Theta}}{cos^2{pTheta}}$$



We have $f(0)=1$, and because $0<p<1$, the term $sin(p-1)Theta$ makes the derivative negative: $f'(Theta) < 0$ on $(0,frac{pi}{2})$.



At $0$ we have $f'(0)=0$, so we cannot immediately deduce that $f$ is decreasing on all of $[0,frac{pi}{2})$.



However, considering that $f(0)=1, f(frac{pi}{2})=0$, and both $f$ and $f'$ are continuous on $[0,frac{pi}{2})$, if it were the case that $f$ rises above $1$ at some $Theta in (0,frac{pi}{2})$, $f$ would have to have a local maximum somewhere in $(0,frac{pi}{2})$, with the derivative vanishing at that point, which cannot happen. Therefore $f(Theta) le 1$ throughout $[0,frac{pi}{2}]$, Q.E.D.







calculus trigonometry proof-verification






share|cite|improve this question















share|cite|improve this question













share|cite|improve this question




share|cite|improve this question








edited 2 hours ago









Kemono Chen

3,0001741




3,0001741










asked 3 hours ago









AnatolyVorobeyAnatolyVorobey

1,632513




1,632513












  • $begingroup$
    if it were the case that $f$ rises above $1$ at some $Theta in (0,frac{pi}{2})$, $f$ would have to have a local maximum somewhere in $(0,frac{pi}{2})$. Why???
    $endgroup$
    – Riemann
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    As a continuous function on a compact interval $[0,frac{pi}{2}]$, $f$ must assume its maximum value somewhere in the interval (Extreme Value Theorem); if $f(Theta)>1$ somewhere in $(0,frac{pi}{2})$, then that maximum must lie within $(0, frac{pi}{2})$ because the values on the borders are 0 and 1.
    $endgroup$
    – AnatolyVorobey
    1 hour ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it is right.
    $endgroup$
    – Riemann
    1 hour ago


















  • $begingroup$
    if it were the case that $f$ rises above $1$ at some $Theta in (0,frac{pi}{2})$, $f$ would have to have a local maximum somewhere in $(0,frac{pi}{2})$. Why???
    $endgroup$
    – Riemann
    1 hour ago










  • $begingroup$
    As a continuous function on a compact interval $[0,frac{pi}{2}]$, $f$ must assume its maximum value somewhere in the interval (Extreme Value Theorem); if $f(Theta)>1$ somewhere in $(0,frac{pi}{2})$, then that maximum must lie within $(0, frac{pi}{2})$ because the values on the borders are 0 and 1.
    $endgroup$
    – AnatolyVorobey
    1 hour ago








  • 1




    $begingroup$
    Yes, it is right.
    $endgroup$
    – Riemann
    1 hour ago
















$begingroup$
if it were the case that $f$ rises above $1$ at some $Theta in (0,frac{pi}{2})$, $f$ would have to have a local maximum somewhere in $(0,frac{pi}{2})$. Why???
$endgroup$
– Riemann
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
if it were the case that $f$ rises above $1$ at some $Theta in (0,frac{pi}{2})$, $f$ would have to have a local maximum somewhere in $(0,frac{pi}{2})$. Why???
$endgroup$
– Riemann
1 hour ago












$begingroup$
As a continuous function on a compact interval $[0,frac{pi}{2}]$, $f$ must assume its maximum value somewhere in the interval (Extreme Value Theorem); if $f(Theta)>1$ somewhere in $(0,frac{pi}{2})$, then that maximum must lie within $(0, frac{pi}{2})$ because the values on the borders are 0 and 1.
$endgroup$
– AnatolyVorobey
1 hour ago






$begingroup$
As a continuous function on a compact interval $[0,frac{pi}{2}]$, $f$ must assume its maximum value somewhere in the interval (Extreme Value Theorem); if $f(Theta)>1$ somewhere in $(0,frac{pi}{2})$, then that maximum must lie within $(0, frac{pi}{2})$ because the values on the borders are 0 and 1.
$endgroup$
– AnatolyVorobey
1 hour ago






1




1




$begingroup$
Yes, it is right.
$endgroup$
– Riemann
1 hour ago




$begingroup$
Yes, it is right.
$endgroup$
– Riemann
1 hour ago










1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes


















3












$begingroup$

Use Mean Value Theorem you can prove the following lemma:



suppose $f(x)$ is continuous on $[a,b]$ and has derivative in $(a,b)$. If $f'(x)<0$ for $xin(a,b)$, then $f(x)$ is strictly decreasing on $[a,b]$.



So you need only $f'(Theta) < 0$ for $Thetain(0,pi/2)$ in your situation!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    That's pretty, thank you! Can you also comment if the custom argument in my proof looks correct?
    $endgroup$
    – AnatolyVorobey
    2 hours ago











Your Answer





StackExchange.ifUsing("editor", function () {
return StackExchange.using("mathjaxEditing", function () {
StackExchange.MarkdownEditor.creationCallbacks.add(function (editor, postfix) {
StackExchange.mathjaxEditing.prepareWmdForMathJax(editor, postfix, [["$", "$"], ["\\(","\\)"]]);
});
});
}, "mathjax-editing");

StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "69"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});

function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});


}
});














draft saved

draft discarded


















StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082851%2fproving-a-cosine-inequality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown

























1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes








1 Answer
1






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









3












$begingroup$

Use Mean Value Theorem you can prove the following lemma:



suppose $f(x)$ is continuous on $[a,b]$ and has derivative in $(a,b)$. If $f'(x)<0$ for $xin(a,b)$, then $f(x)$ is strictly decreasing on $[a,b]$.



So you need only $f'(Theta) < 0$ for $Thetain(0,pi/2)$ in your situation!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    That's pretty, thank you! Can you also comment if the custom argument in my proof looks correct?
    $endgroup$
    – AnatolyVorobey
    2 hours ago
















3












$begingroup$

Use Mean Value Theorem you can prove the following lemma:



suppose $f(x)$ is continuous on $[a,b]$ and has derivative in $(a,b)$. If $f'(x)<0$ for $xin(a,b)$, then $f(x)$ is strictly decreasing on $[a,b]$.



So you need only $f'(Theta) < 0$ for $Thetain(0,pi/2)$ in your situation!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$













  • $begingroup$
    That's pretty, thank you! Can you also comment if the custom argument in my proof looks correct?
    $endgroup$
    – AnatolyVorobey
    2 hours ago














3












3








3





$begingroup$

Use Mean Value Theorem you can prove the following lemma:



suppose $f(x)$ is continuous on $[a,b]$ and has derivative in $(a,b)$. If $f'(x)<0$ for $xin(a,b)$, then $f(x)$ is strictly decreasing on $[a,b]$.



So you need only $f'(Theta) < 0$ for $Thetain(0,pi/2)$ in your situation!






share|cite|improve this answer











$endgroup$



Use Mean Value Theorem you can prove the following lemma:



suppose $f(x)$ is continuous on $[a,b]$ and has derivative in $(a,b)$. If $f'(x)<0$ for $xin(a,b)$, then $f(x)$ is strictly decreasing on $[a,b]$.



So you need only $f'(Theta) < 0$ for $Thetain(0,pi/2)$ in your situation!







share|cite|improve this answer














share|cite|improve this answer



share|cite|improve this answer








edited 2 hours ago

























answered 3 hours ago









RiemannRiemann

3,4051322




3,4051322












  • $begingroup$
    That's pretty, thank you! Can you also comment if the custom argument in my proof looks correct?
    $endgroup$
    – AnatolyVorobey
    2 hours ago


















  • $begingroup$
    That's pretty, thank you! Can you also comment if the custom argument in my proof looks correct?
    $endgroup$
    – AnatolyVorobey
    2 hours ago
















$begingroup$
That's pretty, thank you! Can you also comment if the custom argument in my proof looks correct?
$endgroup$
– AnatolyVorobey
2 hours ago




$begingroup$
That's pretty, thank you! Can you also comment if the custom argument in my proof looks correct?
$endgroup$
– AnatolyVorobey
2 hours ago


















draft saved

draft discarded




















































Thanks for contributing an answer to Mathematics Stack Exchange!


  • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

But avoid



  • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

  • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


Use MathJax to format equations. MathJax reference.


To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




draft saved


draft discarded














StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmath.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f3082851%2fproving-a-cosine-inequality%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);

Post as a guest















Required, but never shown





















































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown

































Required, but never shown














Required, but never shown












Required, but never shown







Required, but never shown







Popular posts from this blog

الفوسفات في المغرب

Four equal circles intersect: What is the area of the small shaded portion and its height

جامعة ليفربول