Cannot figure out how to remove this Using Temporary
.everyoneloves__top-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__mid-leaderboard:empty,.everyoneloves__bot-mid-leaderboard:empty{ margin-bottom:0;
}
I have what seems like a simple query, and my indexes seem to be sufficient without the INNER JOIN, but after I add the join, I end up seeing "Using Temporary". Would also appreciate any good resources for learning more about query optimization!
Query:
SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS DISTINCT m.id
FROM messages m
INNER JOIN message_entries t2
ON m.id = t2.message_id
WHERE m.user_id = 1234
AND m.type = 1
ORDER BY m.sent_on DESC;
The messages table has a covering index for (user_id, type, sent_on, created) and it uses this index for the query, and the message_entries table has an index on message_id (through foreign key).
I've tried adding id to the covering index on the messages table (at the beginning or end of the index, i've tried both), but it still chooses to use the original index for user_id, type, sent_on, created.
What can I do to improve performance when adding joins to the base query?
mysql join optimization
asked 32 mins ago
robert.bo.rothrobert.bo.roth
1011
New contributor
robert.bo.roth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I have what seems like a simple query, and my indexes seem to be sufficient without the INNER JOIN, but after I add the join, I end up seeing "Using Temporary". Would also appreciate any good resources for learning more about query optimization!
Query:
SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS DISTINCT m.id
FROM messages m
INNER JOIN message_entries t2
ON m.id = t2.message_id
WHERE m.user_id = 1234
AND m.type = 1
ORDER BY m.sent_on DESC;
The messages table has a covering index for (user_id, type, sent_on, created) and it uses this index for the query, and the message_entries table has an index on message_id (through foreign key).
I've tried adding id to the covering index on the messages table (at the beginning or end of the index, i've tried both), but it still chooses to use the original index for user_id, type, sent_on, created.
What can I do to improve performance when adding joins to the base query?
mysql join optimization
asked 32 mins ago
robert.bo.rothrobert.bo.roth
1011
New contributor
robert.bo.roth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
I have what seems like a simple query, and my indexes seem to be sufficient without the INNER JOIN, but after I add the join, I end up seeing "Using Temporary". Would also appreciate any good resources for learning more about query optimization!
Query:
SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS DISTINCT m.id
FROM messages m
INNER JOIN message_entries t2
ON m.id = t2.message_id
WHERE m.user_id = 1234
AND m.type = 1
ORDER BY m.sent_on DESC;
The messages table has a covering index for (user_id, type, sent_on, created) and it uses this index for the query, and the message_entries table has an index on message_id (through foreign key).
I've tried adding id to the covering index on the messages table (at the beginning or end of the index, i've tried both), but it still chooses to use the original index for user_id, type, sent_on, created.
What can I do to improve performance when adding joins to the base query?
mysql join optimization
asked 32 mins ago
robert.bo.rothrobert.bo.roth
1011
New contributor
robert.bo.roth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
I have what seems like a simple query, and my indexes seem to be sufficient without the INNER JOIN, but after I add the join, I end up seeing "Using Temporary". Would also appreciate any good resources for learning more about query optimization!
Query:
SELECT SQL_CALC_FOUND_ROWS DISTINCT m.id
FROM messages m
INNER JOIN message_entries t2
ON m.id = t2.message_id
WHERE m.user_id = 1234
AND m.type = 1
ORDER BY m.sent_on DESC;
The messages table has a covering index for (user_id, type, sent_on, created) and it uses this index for the query, and the message_entries table has an index on message_id (through foreign key).
I've tried adding id to the covering index on the messages table (at the beginning or end of the index, i've tried both), but it still chooses to use the original index for user_id, type, sent_on, created.
What can I do to improve performance when adding joins to the base query?
mysql join optimization
mysql join optimization
asked 32 mins ago
robert.bo.rothrobert.bo.roth
1011
New contributor
robert.bo.roth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 32 mins ago
robert.bo.rothrobert.bo.roth
1011
New contributor
robert.bo.roth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 32 mins ago
robert.bo.rothrobert.bo.roth
1011
New contributor
robert.bo.roth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked 32 mins ago
robert.bo.rothrobert.bo.roth
1011
asked 32 mins ago
robert.bo.rothrobert.bo.roth
1011
1011
New contributor
robert.bo.roth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
robert.bo.roth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
robert.bo.roth is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
add a comment |
add a comment |
0
active
oldest
votes
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "182"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: false,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: null,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
robert.bo.roth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f234325%2fcannot-figure-out-how-to-remove-this-using-temporary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
0
active
oldest
votes
0
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
robert.bo.roth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
robert.bo.roth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
robert.bo.roth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
robert.bo.roth is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f234325%2fcannot-figure-out-how-to-remove-this-using-temporary%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
