Move new data records automatically to another database in oracle xe












0















What's the best way to move all the data from a table on my local oracle database to an identical table on another pc? I will have to transfer the data to the second database as soon as it's written to the local one. The local table should not contain any data, unless it's not possible to insert it to the remote database. If the connection is lost, all new datasets must be stored in the local table.
I tried to solve this by using a trigger, but it didn't work as expected. It works just fine if the remote database connection is valid, but it performs an entire rollback (including the original insert) if the connection is lost. Because of that, the data isnt even inserted to the local database. Another huge problem is that it takes about 40 seconds every time to return ORA-12170 (Connection timeout). Is there any way to set a much shorter time interval for the timeout or to abort the query if it takes that much time?



create or replace TRIGGER DATA_TO_SERVER 
AFTER INSERT ON LOCAL_TABLE
DECLARE
PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;
BEGIN
SAVEPOINT sp;

INSERT INTO SERVER.SERVER_TABLE@SERVER_LINK
SELECT *
FROM LOCAL_TABLE;

DELETE
FROM LOCAL_TABLE
WHERE ID IS NOT NULL;

COMMIT;

EXCEPTION WHEN OTHERS THEN
ROLLBACK to sp;
RAISE;

END;









share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 22 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
















  • Use DataPump

    – a_horse_with_no_name
    Feb 19 '18 at 12:39











  • The best way is to use export and import, you can also customize according to object type, schema and many other options.

    – Husam Mohamed
    Feb 19 '18 at 12:41











  • What do you want to achieve with this complicated mechanism? Do you want that the data is stored in a local table if the remote database cannot be reached?

    – miracle173
    Feb 19 '18 at 15:32













  • @miracle173 Yes, thats exactly what i want to achieve. I also thought of using a c# application, but i wasn't able to delete the data records that have already been moved to the server.

    – Gandalf The Gay
    Feb 20 '18 at 6:10
















0















What's the best way to move all the data from a table on my local oracle database to an identical table on another pc? I will have to transfer the data to the second database as soon as it's written to the local one. The local table should not contain any data, unless it's not possible to insert it to the remote database. If the connection is lost, all new datasets must be stored in the local table.
I tried to solve this by using a trigger, but it didn't work as expected. It works just fine if the remote database connection is valid, but it performs an entire rollback (including the original insert) if the connection is lost. Because of that, the data isnt even inserted to the local database. Another huge problem is that it takes about 40 seconds every time to return ORA-12170 (Connection timeout). Is there any way to set a much shorter time interval for the timeout or to abort the query if it takes that much time?



create or replace TRIGGER DATA_TO_SERVER 
AFTER INSERT ON LOCAL_TABLE
DECLARE
PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;
BEGIN
SAVEPOINT sp;

INSERT INTO SERVER.SERVER_TABLE@SERVER_LINK
SELECT *
FROM LOCAL_TABLE;

DELETE
FROM LOCAL_TABLE
WHERE ID IS NOT NULL;

COMMIT;

EXCEPTION WHEN OTHERS THEN
ROLLBACK to sp;
RAISE;

END;









share|improve this question
















bumped to the homepage by Community 22 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.
















  • Use DataPump

    – a_horse_with_no_name
    Feb 19 '18 at 12:39











  • The best way is to use export and import, you can also customize according to object type, schema and many other options.

    – Husam Mohamed
    Feb 19 '18 at 12:41











  • What do you want to achieve with this complicated mechanism? Do you want that the data is stored in a local table if the remote database cannot be reached?

    – miracle173
    Feb 19 '18 at 15:32













  • @miracle173 Yes, thats exactly what i want to achieve. I also thought of using a c# application, but i wasn't able to delete the data records that have already been moved to the server.

    – Gandalf The Gay
    Feb 20 '18 at 6:10














0












0








0








What's the best way to move all the data from a table on my local oracle database to an identical table on another pc? I will have to transfer the data to the second database as soon as it's written to the local one. The local table should not contain any data, unless it's not possible to insert it to the remote database. If the connection is lost, all new datasets must be stored in the local table.
I tried to solve this by using a trigger, but it didn't work as expected. It works just fine if the remote database connection is valid, but it performs an entire rollback (including the original insert) if the connection is lost. Because of that, the data isnt even inserted to the local database. Another huge problem is that it takes about 40 seconds every time to return ORA-12170 (Connection timeout). Is there any way to set a much shorter time interval for the timeout or to abort the query if it takes that much time?



create or replace TRIGGER DATA_TO_SERVER 
AFTER INSERT ON LOCAL_TABLE
DECLARE
PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;
BEGIN
SAVEPOINT sp;

INSERT INTO SERVER.SERVER_TABLE@SERVER_LINK
SELECT *
FROM LOCAL_TABLE;

DELETE
FROM LOCAL_TABLE
WHERE ID IS NOT NULL;

COMMIT;

EXCEPTION WHEN OTHERS THEN
ROLLBACK to sp;
RAISE;

END;









share|improve this question
















What's the best way to move all the data from a table on my local oracle database to an identical table on another pc? I will have to transfer the data to the second database as soon as it's written to the local one. The local table should not contain any data, unless it's not possible to insert it to the remote database. If the connection is lost, all new datasets must be stored in the local table.
I tried to solve this by using a trigger, but it didn't work as expected. It works just fine if the remote database connection is valid, but it performs an entire rollback (including the original insert) if the connection is lost. Because of that, the data isnt even inserted to the local database. Another huge problem is that it takes about 40 seconds every time to return ORA-12170 (Connection timeout). Is there any way to set a much shorter time interval for the timeout or to abort the query if it takes that much time?



create or replace TRIGGER DATA_TO_SERVER 
AFTER INSERT ON LOCAL_TABLE
DECLARE
PRAGMA AUTONOMOUS_TRANSACTION;
BEGIN
SAVEPOINT sp;

INSERT INTO SERVER.SERVER_TABLE@SERVER_LINK
SELECT *
FROM LOCAL_TABLE;

DELETE
FROM LOCAL_TABLE
WHERE ID IS NOT NULL;

COMMIT;

EXCEPTION WHEN OTHERS THEN
ROLLBACK to sp;
RAISE;

END;






oracle trigger






share|improve this question















share|improve this question













share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited Feb 19 '18 at 13:17







Gandalf The Gay

















asked Feb 19 '18 at 12:38









Gandalf The GayGandalf The Gay

63




63





bumped to the homepage by Community 22 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.







bumped to the homepage by Community 22 mins ago


This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed.















  • Use DataPump

    – a_horse_with_no_name
    Feb 19 '18 at 12:39











  • The best way is to use export and import, you can also customize according to object type, schema and many other options.

    – Husam Mohamed
    Feb 19 '18 at 12:41











  • What do you want to achieve with this complicated mechanism? Do you want that the data is stored in a local table if the remote database cannot be reached?

    – miracle173
    Feb 19 '18 at 15:32













  • @miracle173 Yes, thats exactly what i want to achieve. I also thought of using a c# application, but i wasn't able to delete the data records that have already been moved to the server.

    – Gandalf The Gay
    Feb 20 '18 at 6:10



















  • Use DataPump

    – a_horse_with_no_name
    Feb 19 '18 at 12:39











  • The best way is to use export and import, you can also customize according to object type, schema and many other options.

    – Husam Mohamed
    Feb 19 '18 at 12:41











  • What do you want to achieve with this complicated mechanism? Do you want that the data is stored in a local table if the remote database cannot be reached?

    – miracle173
    Feb 19 '18 at 15:32













  • @miracle173 Yes, thats exactly what i want to achieve. I also thought of using a c# application, but i wasn't able to delete the data records that have already been moved to the server.

    – Gandalf The Gay
    Feb 20 '18 at 6:10

















Use DataPump

– a_horse_with_no_name
Feb 19 '18 at 12:39





Use DataPump

– a_horse_with_no_name
Feb 19 '18 at 12:39













The best way is to use export and import, you can also customize according to object type, schema and many other options.

– Husam Mohamed
Feb 19 '18 at 12:41





The best way is to use export and import, you can also customize according to object type, schema and many other options.

– Husam Mohamed
Feb 19 '18 at 12:41













What do you want to achieve with this complicated mechanism? Do you want that the data is stored in a local table if the remote database cannot be reached?

– miracle173
Feb 19 '18 at 15:32







What do you want to achieve with this complicated mechanism? Do you want that the data is stored in a local table if the remote database cannot be reached?

– miracle173
Feb 19 '18 at 15:32















@miracle173 Yes, thats exactly what i want to achieve. I also thought of using a c# application, but i wasn't able to delete the data records that have already been moved to the server.

– Gandalf The Gay
Feb 20 '18 at 6:10





@miracle173 Yes, thats exactly what i want to achieve. I also thought of using a c# application, but i wasn't able to delete the data records that have already been moved to the server.

– Gandalf The Gay
Feb 20 '18 at 6:10










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















0














SQL> Create Directory EXPDIR as 'PATH';


The export command



expdp directory=expdir dumpfile=newExport.dmp full=y logfile=newExport.log




on the target database also create a directory



Create Directory EXPDIR as 'PATH';


The import command



IMPDP directory=ExpDir dumpfile=newExport.dmp Logfile=import_Database.LOG FULL=Y




By the way this is a full export and import, you can customize it according to your preference on what exactly to export or import



https://docs.oracle.com/cloud/latest/db112/SUTIL/dp_export.htm#SUTIL200






share|improve this answer
























  • Wouldn't using a datadump require me to export and import the entire database manually? Both databases have only one table in common and i only need to move a view newly inserted data records per second from one database to the other automatically.

    – Gandalf The Gay
    Feb 19 '18 at 13:09











  • That's true, although if your data wasn't much then it wouldn't take time. But for your case as a repetitive task might not be very practical. Perhaps your current way is fine using trigger and DB-link but needs some tuning to work with better performance.

    – Husam Mohamed
    Feb 20 '18 at 7:37



















0














The only solution I see (I'm very myopic) is creating a view on that table, inserts happen into that view, and "instead-of" triggers handling those inserts. If inserting into the remote table fails, insert locally.






share|improve this answer































    0














    I would use a view with instead_of trigger as GerhardH.Pille proposed. In my environment I cannot use database links so I use a local table called remotetab. Replace it by remotetab@remotedb if you have a database remotedb. In my example the length of the second columns of the local and the remote table differ. But this is only to simulate an error when trying to insert in the remote table.



    drop table localtab;
    drop table remotetab;
    drop view localview;

    create table localtab(
    id number primary key,
    name varchar2(30) not null)
    /

    create table remotetab(
    id number primary key,
    name varchar2(3) not null)
    /

    create view localview(id, name)
    as
    select id, name
    from localtab
    /

    create trigger localtrig
    instead of insert on localview
    begin
    insert into remotetab(id,name) values(:new.id, :new.name);
    exception
    when others then
    insert into localtab(id,name) values(:new.id, :new.name);
    end;
    /

    insert into localview(id, name) values(1,'a');
    insert into localview(id, name) values(2,'hallo');
    insert into localview(id, name) values('x','y');

    select id, name remote from remotetab;
    select id, name local from localtab;


    The inserts return



    1 row(s) inserted.

    1 row(s) inserted.

    ORA-01722: invalid number ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SQL", line 1721


    and the selects return



    id   local
    1 'a'

    id remote
    2 'hallo'


    as expected.






    share|improve this answer























      Your Answer








      StackExchange.ready(function() {
      var channelOptions = {
      tags: "".split(" "),
      id: "182"
      };
      initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

      StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
      // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
      if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
      StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
      createEditor();
      });
      }
      else {
      createEditor();
      }
      });

      function createEditor() {
      StackExchange.prepareEditor({
      heartbeatType: 'answer',
      autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
      convertImagesToLinks: false,
      noModals: true,
      showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
      reputationToPostImages: null,
      bindNavPrevention: true,
      postfix: "",
      imageUploader: {
      brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
      contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
      allowUrls: true
      },
      onDemand: true,
      discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
      ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
      });


      }
      });














      draft saved

      draft discarded


















      StackExchange.ready(
      function () {
      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f198257%2fmove-new-data-records-automatically-to-another-database-in-oracle-xe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
      }
      );

      Post as a guest















      Required, but never shown

























      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes








      3 Answers
      3






      active

      oldest

      votes









      active

      oldest

      votes






      active

      oldest

      votes









      0














      SQL> Create Directory EXPDIR as 'PATH';


      The export command



      expdp directory=expdir dumpfile=newExport.dmp full=y logfile=newExport.log




      on the target database also create a directory



      Create Directory EXPDIR as 'PATH';


      The import command



      IMPDP directory=ExpDir dumpfile=newExport.dmp Logfile=import_Database.LOG FULL=Y




      By the way this is a full export and import, you can customize it according to your preference on what exactly to export or import



      https://docs.oracle.com/cloud/latest/db112/SUTIL/dp_export.htm#SUTIL200






      share|improve this answer
























      • Wouldn't using a datadump require me to export and import the entire database manually? Both databases have only one table in common and i only need to move a view newly inserted data records per second from one database to the other automatically.

        – Gandalf The Gay
        Feb 19 '18 at 13:09











      • That's true, although if your data wasn't much then it wouldn't take time. But for your case as a repetitive task might not be very practical. Perhaps your current way is fine using trigger and DB-link but needs some tuning to work with better performance.

        – Husam Mohamed
        Feb 20 '18 at 7:37
















      0














      SQL> Create Directory EXPDIR as 'PATH';


      The export command



      expdp directory=expdir dumpfile=newExport.dmp full=y logfile=newExport.log




      on the target database also create a directory



      Create Directory EXPDIR as 'PATH';


      The import command



      IMPDP directory=ExpDir dumpfile=newExport.dmp Logfile=import_Database.LOG FULL=Y




      By the way this is a full export and import, you can customize it according to your preference on what exactly to export or import



      https://docs.oracle.com/cloud/latest/db112/SUTIL/dp_export.htm#SUTIL200






      share|improve this answer
























      • Wouldn't using a datadump require me to export and import the entire database manually? Both databases have only one table in common and i only need to move a view newly inserted data records per second from one database to the other automatically.

        – Gandalf The Gay
        Feb 19 '18 at 13:09











      • That's true, although if your data wasn't much then it wouldn't take time. But for your case as a repetitive task might not be very practical. Perhaps your current way is fine using trigger and DB-link but needs some tuning to work with better performance.

        – Husam Mohamed
        Feb 20 '18 at 7:37














      0












      0








      0







      SQL> Create Directory EXPDIR as 'PATH';


      The export command



      expdp directory=expdir dumpfile=newExport.dmp full=y logfile=newExport.log




      on the target database also create a directory



      Create Directory EXPDIR as 'PATH';


      The import command



      IMPDP directory=ExpDir dumpfile=newExport.dmp Logfile=import_Database.LOG FULL=Y




      By the way this is a full export and import, you can customize it according to your preference on what exactly to export or import



      https://docs.oracle.com/cloud/latest/db112/SUTIL/dp_export.htm#SUTIL200






      share|improve this answer













      SQL> Create Directory EXPDIR as 'PATH';


      The export command



      expdp directory=expdir dumpfile=newExport.dmp full=y logfile=newExport.log




      on the target database also create a directory



      Create Directory EXPDIR as 'PATH';


      The import command



      IMPDP directory=ExpDir dumpfile=newExport.dmp Logfile=import_Database.LOG FULL=Y




      By the way this is a full export and import, you can customize it according to your preference on what exactly to export or import



      https://docs.oracle.com/cloud/latest/db112/SUTIL/dp_export.htm#SUTIL200







      share|improve this answer












      share|improve this answer



      share|improve this answer










      answered Feb 19 '18 at 12:46









      Husam MohamedHusam Mohamed

      4161313




      4161313













      • Wouldn't using a datadump require me to export and import the entire database manually? Both databases have only one table in common and i only need to move a view newly inserted data records per second from one database to the other automatically.

        – Gandalf The Gay
        Feb 19 '18 at 13:09











      • That's true, although if your data wasn't much then it wouldn't take time. But for your case as a repetitive task might not be very practical. Perhaps your current way is fine using trigger and DB-link but needs some tuning to work with better performance.

        – Husam Mohamed
        Feb 20 '18 at 7:37



















      • Wouldn't using a datadump require me to export and import the entire database manually? Both databases have only one table in common and i only need to move a view newly inserted data records per second from one database to the other automatically.

        – Gandalf The Gay
        Feb 19 '18 at 13:09











      • That's true, although if your data wasn't much then it wouldn't take time. But for your case as a repetitive task might not be very practical. Perhaps your current way is fine using trigger and DB-link but needs some tuning to work with better performance.

        – Husam Mohamed
        Feb 20 '18 at 7:37

















      Wouldn't using a datadump require me to export and import the entire database manually? Both databases have only one table in common and i only need to move a view newly inserted data records per second from one database to the other automatically.

      – Gandalf The Gay
      Feb 19 '18 at 13:09





      Wouldn't using a datadump require me to export and import the entire database manually? Both databases have only one table in common and i only need to move a view newly inserted data records per second from one database to the other automatically.

      – Gandalf The Gay
      Feb 19 '18 at 13:09













      That's true, although if your data wasn't much then it wouldn't take time. But for your case as a repetitive task might not be very practical. Perhaps your current way is fine using trigger and DB-link but needs some tuning to work with better performance.

      – Husam Mohamed
      Feb 20 '18 at 7:37





      That's true, although if your data wasn't much then it wouldn't take time. But for your case as a repetitive task might not be very practical. Perhaps your current way is fine using trigger and DB-link but needs some tuning to work with better performance.

      – Husam Mohamed
      Feb 20 '18 at 7:37













      0














      The only solution I see (I'm very myopic) is creating a view on that table, inserts happen into that view, and "instead-of" triggers handling those inserts. If inserting into the remote table fails, insert locally.






      share|improve this answer




























        0














        The only solution I see (I'm very myopic) is creating a view on that table, inserts happen into that view, and "instead-of" triggers handling those inserts. If inserting into the remote table fails, insert locally.






        share|improve this answer


























          0












          0








          0







          The only solution I see (I'm very myopic) is creating a view on that table, inserts happen into that view, and "instead-of" triggers handling those inserts. If inserting into the remote table fails, insert locally.






          share|improve this answer













          The only solution I see (I'm very myopic) is creating a view on that table, inserts happen into that view, and "instead-of" triggers handling those inserts. If inserting into the remote table fails, insert locally.







          share|improve this answer












          share|improve this answer



          share|improve this answer










          answered Feb 19 '18 at 14:35









          Gerard H. PilleGerard H. Pille

          1,307128




          1,307128























              0














              I would use a view with instead_of trigger as GerhardH.Pille proposed. In my environment I cannot use database links so I use a local table called remotetab. Replace it by remotetab@remotedb if you have a database remotedb. In my example the length of the second columns of the local and the remote table differ. But this is only to simulate an error when trying to insert in the remote table.



              drop table localtab;
              drop table remotetab;
              drop view localview;

              create table localtab(
              id number primary key,
              name varchar2(30) not null)
              /

              create table remotetab(
              id number primary key,
              name varchar2(3) not null)
              /

              create view localview(id, name)
              as
              select id, name
              from localtab
              /

              create trigger localtrig
              instead of insert on localview
              begin
              insert into remotetab(id,name) values(:new.id, :new.name);
              exception
              when others then
              insert into localtab(id,name) values(:new.id, :new.name);
              end;
              /

              insert into localview(id, name) values(1,'a');
              insert into localview(id, name) values(2,'hallo');
              insert into localview(id, name) values('x','y');

              select id, name remote from remotetab;
              select id, name local from localtab;


              The inserts return



              1 row(s) inserted.

              1 row(s) inserted.

              ORA-01722: invalid number ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SQL", line 1721


              and the selects return



              id   local
              1 'a'

              id remote
              2 'hallo'


              as expected.






              share|improve this answer




























                0














                I would use a view with instead_of trigger as GerhardH.Pille proposed. In my environment I cannot use database links so I use a local table called remotetab. Replace it by remotetab@remotedb if you have a database remotedb. In my example the length of the second columns of the local and the remote table differ. But this is only to simulate an error when trying to insert in the remote table.



                drop table localtab;
                drop table remotetab;
                drop view localview;

                create table localtab(
                id number primary key,
                name varchar2(30) not null)
                /

                create table remotetab(
                id number primary key,
                name varchar2(3) not null)
                /

                create view localview(id, name)
                as
                select id, name
                from localtab
                /

                create trigger localtrig
                instead of insert on localview
                begin
                insert into remotetab(id,name) values(:new.id, :new.name);
                exception
                when others then
                insert into localtab(id,name) values(:new.id, :new.name);
                end;
                /

                insert into localview(id, name) values(1,'a');
                insert into localview(id, name) values(2,'hallo');
                insert into localview(id, name) values('x','y');

                select id, name remote from remotetab;
                select id, name local from localtab;


                The inserts return



                1 row(s) inserted.

                1 row(s) inserted.

                ORA-01722: invalid number ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SQL", line 1721


                and the selects return



                id   local
                1 'a'

                id remote
                2 'hallo'


                as expected.






                share|improve this answer


























                  0












                  0








                  0







                  I would use a view with instead_of trigger as GerhardH.Pille proposed. In my environment I cannot use database links so I use a local table called remotetab. Replace it by remotetab@remotedb if you have a database remotedb. In my example the length of the second columns of the local and the remote table differ. But this is only to simulate an error when trying to insert in the remote table.



                  drop table localtab;
                  drop table remotetab;
                  drop view localview;

                  create table localtab(
                  id number primary key,
                  name varchar2(30) not null)
                  /

                  create table remotetab(
                  id number primary key,
                  name varchar2(3) not null)
                  /

                  create view localview(id, name)
                  as
                  select id, name
                  from localtab
                  /

                  create trigger localtrig
                  instead of insert on localview
                  begin
                  insert into remotetab(id,name) values(:new.id, :new.name);
                  exception
                  when others then
                  insert into localtab(id,name) values(:new.id, :new.name);
                  end;
                  /

                  insert into localview(id, name) values(1,'a');
                  insert into localview(id, name) values(2,'hallo');
                  insert into localview(id, name) values('x','y');

                  select id, name remote from remotetab;
                  select id, name local from localtab;


                  The inserts return



                  1 row(s) inserted.

                  1 row(s) inserted.

                  ORA-01722: invalid number ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SQL", line 1721


                  and the selects return



                  id   local
                  1 'a'

                  id remote
                  2 'hallo'


                  as expected.






                  share|improve this answer













                  I would use a view with instead_of trigger as GerhardH.Pille proposed. In my environment I cannot use database links so I use a local table called remotetab. Replace it by remotetab@remotedb if you have a database remotedb. In my example the length of the second columns of the local and the remote table differ. But this is only to simulate an error when trying to insert in the remote table.



                  drop table localtab;
                  drop table remotetab;
                  drop view localview;

                  create table localtab(
                  id number primary key,
                  name varchar2(30) not null)
                  /

                  create table remotetab(
                  id number primary key,
                  name varchar2(3) not null)
                  /

                  create view localview(id, name)
                  as
                  select id, name
                  from localtab
                  /

                  create trigger localtrig
                  instead of insert on localview
                  begin
                  insert into remotetab(id,name) values(:new.id, :new.name);
                  exception
                  when others then
                  insert into localtab(id,name) values(:new.id, :new.name);
                  end;
                  /

                  insert into localview(id, name) values(1,'a');
                  insert into localview(id, name) values(2,'hallo');
                  insert into localview(id, name) values('x','y');

                  select id, name remote from remotetab;
                  select id, name local from localtab;


                  The inserts return



                  1 row(s) inserted.

                  1 row(s) inserted.

                  ORA-01722: invalid number ORA-06512: at "SYS.DBMS_SQL", line 1721


                  and the selects return



                  id   local
                  1 'a'

                  id remote
                  2 'hallo'


                  as expected.







                  share|improve this answer












                  share|improve this answer



                  share|improve this answer










                  answered Feb 20 '18 at 7:44









                  miracle173miracle173

                  6,5571837




                  6,5571837






























                      draft saved

                      draft discarded




















































                      Thanks for contributing an answer to Database Administrators Stack Exchange!


                      • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                      But avoid



                      • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                      • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                      To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                      draft saved


                      draft discarded














                      StackExchange.ready(
                      function () {
                      StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fdba.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f198257%2fmove-new-data-records-automatically-to-another-database-in-oracle-xe%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                      }
                      );

                      Post as a guest















                      Required, but never shown





















































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown

































                      Required, but never shown














                      Required, but never shown












                      Required, but never shown







                      Required, but never shown







                      Popular posts from this blog

                      الفوسفات في المغرب

                      Four equal circles intersect: What is the area of the small shaded portion and its height

                      جامعة ليفربول