.COM vs newer domain extensions












2















I have a website with a new TLD. I am not trying to advertise here, but listing the domain names is the only way I know how to articulate this question.



I have both, theboss.host and thebosshost.com registered. I chose to use the former, the shorter version for my website.



I am wondering if potential visitors have an aversion to the newer TLDs. Should I just go with the .com even though it is much longer? Are there any SEO implication to using the more obscure domain extenstions?



I think my question is more anthropological/physocological than technical. I would love to hear from anyone with experience or has a solid opinion on the matter.










share|improve this question







New contributor




K Tysinger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.

























    2















    I have a website with a new TLD. I am not trying to advertise here, but listing the domain names is the only way I know how to articulate this question.



    I have both, theboss.host and thebosshost.com registered. I chose to use the former, the shorter version for my website.



    I am wondering if potential visitors have an aversion to the newer TLDs. Should I just go with the .com even though it is much longer? Are there any SEO implication to using the more obscure domain extenstions?



    I think my question is more anthropological/physocological than technical. I would love to hear from anyone with experience or has a solid opinion on the matter.










    share|improve this question







    New contributor




    K Tysinger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
    Check out our Code of Conduct.























      2












      2








      2








      I have a website with a new TLD. I am not trying to advertise here, but listing the domain names is the only way I know how to articulate this question.



      I have both, theboss.host and thebosshost.com registered. I chose to use the former, the shorter version for my website.



      I am wondering if potential visitors have an aversion to the newer TLDs. Should I just go with the .com even though it is much longer? Are there any SEO implication to using the more obscure domain extenstions?



      I think my question is more anthropological/physocological than technical. I would love to hear from anyone with experience or has a solid opinion on the matter.










      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      K Tysinger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.












      I have a website with a new TLD. I am not trying to advertise here, but listing the domain names is the only way I know how to articulate this question.



      I have both, theboss.host and thebosshost.com registered. I chose to use the former, the shorter version for my website.



      I am wondering if potential visitors have an aversion to the newer TLDs. Should I just go with the .com even though it is much longer? Are there any SEO implication to using the more obscure domain extenstions?



      I think my question is more anthropological/physocological than technical. I would love to hear from anyone with experience or has a solid opinion on the matter.







      domains top-level-domains






      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      K Tysinger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.











      share|improve this question







      New contributor




      K Tysinger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      share|improve this question




      share|improve this question






      New contributor




      K Tysinger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.









      asked 16 hours ago









      K TysingerK Tysinger

      112




      112




      New contributor




      K Tysinger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.





      New contributor





      K Tysinger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






      K Tysinger is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
      Check out our Code of Conduct.






















          2 Answers
          2






          active

          oldest

          votes


















          3














          If we're to go by this 2016 survey, general consumers do not trust the new gTLD domain extensions:




          We found that roughly half of consumers are uncomfortable visiting
          websites ending in new domains, and only 9% of consumers feel
          comfortable doing so.



          In terms of their overall security, almost half of respondents report feeling less secure online thanks to the
          introduction of the new gTLDs. This figure is slightly higher than last year too, showing that the wider domain
          industry hasn’t yet done a good enough job to educate the public and organisations about the benfits on offer.



          Trust in the new Internet survey 2016 discussion paper - nccgroup




          However if your website is targeting more savvy or technical users, it stands to reason that they will be more familiar with the new extensions, understand how they work, and know that they usually don't imply any reduction in trust.



          The .io domain is a great example of a "gTLD" that is often used to target tech-savvy users. While technically not really a gTLD it does function like one in practice - standing for "input/output" - and it is popular among the tech startup community.



          Of course it's 2019 now so people may be more familiar with the new gTLDs than they were three years ago. But they likely haven't yet attained the same level of perceived trust as .com, .net, etc.



          As elbrant touched on, it kind of kills the mood when you gotta bust out your pocket notebook to give a mini-lecture on DNS resolution in the elevator. Often times it's easier to just say "our website is [blank].com".






          share|improve this answer

































            2














            Explaining to someone that your site is at anything(hyphen/dash/minus)youwant.com became a nightmare (for me, personally). Avoid using anything that will put you in a position where you have to explain your DNS to a potential site visitor. It negatively affects traffic flow. Telling people your website is at domain.com requires no further information. Everyone understands it, it's comfortable. .net, .org, and some others are commonplace as well. Use the most logical domain name (preferrably with a more familiar extension).


            Using .host makes sense to you. But there's a good chance that seeing it on your marketing materials will make everyone do a double take. Tell some of your friends what your domain will be... do they need an explanation for a site called mydomain.host (with no .com)?


            That should tell you all you need to know.






            share|improve this answer
























            • If he is actually hosting something, then using the host. TLD would make sense. Otherwise it's probably a really bad idea to use it at all.

              – Michael Hampton
              9 hours ago











            Your Answer








            StackExchange.ready(function() {
            var channelOptions = {
            tags: "".split(" "),
            id: "45"
            };
            initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);

            StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
            // Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
            if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
            StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
            createEditor();
            });
            }
            else {
            createEditor();
            }
            });

            function createEditor() {
            StackExchange.prepareEditor({
            heartbeatType: 'answer',
            autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
            convertImagesToLinks: false,
            noModals: true,
            showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
            reputationToPostImages: null,
            bindNavPrevention: true,
            postfix: "",
            imageUploader: {
            brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
            contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
            allowUrls: true
            },
            onDemand: true,
            discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
            ,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
            });


            }
            });






            K Tysinger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










            draft saved

            draft discarded


















            StackExchange.ready(
            function () {
            StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwebmasters.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f120339%2fcom-vs-newer-domain-extensions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
            }
            );

            Post as a guest















            Required, but never shown

























            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes








            2 Answers
            2






            active

            oldest

            votes









            active

            oldest

            votes






            active

            oldest

            votes









            3














            If we're to go by this 2016 survey, general consumers do not trust the new gTLD domain extensions:




            We found that roughly half of consumers are uncomfortable visiting
            websites ending in new domains, and only 9% of consumers feel
            comfortable doing so.



            In terms of their overall security, almost half of respondents report feeling less secure online thanks to the
            introduction of the new gTLDs. This figure is slightly higher than last year too, showing that the wider domain
            industry hasn’t yet done a good enough job to educate the public and organisations about the benfits on offer.



            Trust in the new Internet survey 2016 discussion paper - nccgroup




            However if your website is targeting more savvy or technical users, it stands to reason that they will be more familiar with the new extensions, understand how they work, and know that they usually don't imply any reduction in trust.



            The .io domain is a great example of a "gTLD" that is often used to target tech-savvy users. While technically not really a gTLD it does function like one in practice - standing for "input/output" - and it is popular among the tech startup community.



            Of course it's 2019 now so people may be more familiar with the new gTLDs than they were three years ago. But they likely haven't yet attained the same level of perceived trust as .com, .net, etc.



            As elbrant touched on, it kind of kills the mood when you gotta bust out your pocket notebook to give a mini-lecture on DNS resolution in the elevator. Often times it's easier to just say "our website is [blank].com".






            share|improve this answer






























              3














              If we're to go by this 2016 survey, general consumers do not trust the new gTLD domain extensions:




              We found that roughly half of consumers are uncomfortable visiting
              websites ending in new domains, and only 9% of consumers feel
              comfortable doing so.



              In terms of their overall security, almost half of respondents report feeling less secure online thanks to the
              introduction of the new gTLDs. This figure is slightly higher than last year too, showing that the wider domain
              industry hasn’t yet done a good enough job to educate the public and organisations about the benfits on offer.



              Trust in the new Internet survey 2016 discussion paper - nccgroup




              However if your website is targeting more savvy or technical users, it stands to reason that they will be more familiar with the new extensions, understand how they work, and know that they usually don't imply any reduction in trust.



              The .io domain is a great example of a "gTLD" that is often used to target tech-savvy users. While technically not really a gTLD it does function like one in practice - standing for "input/output" - and it is popular among the tech startup community.



              Of course it's 2019 now so people may be more familiar with the new gTLDs than they were three years ago. But they likely haven't yet attained the same level of perceived trust as .com, .net, etc.



              As elbrant touched on, it kind of kills the mood when you gotta bust out your pocket notebook to give a mini-lecture on DNS resolution in the elevator. Often times it's easier to just say "our website is [blank].com".






              share|improve this answer




























                3












                3








                3







                If we're to go by this 2016 survey, general consumers do not trust the new gTLD domain extensions:




                We found that roughly half of consumers are uncomfortable visiting
                websites ending in new domains, and only 9% of consumers feel
                comfortable doing so.



                In terms of their overall security, almost half of respondents report feeling less secure online thanks to the
                introduction of the new gTLDs. This figure is slightly higher than last year too, showing that the wider domain
                industry hasn’t yet done a good enough job to educate the public and organisations about the benfits on offer.



                Trust in the new Internet survey 2016 discussion paper - nccgroup




                However if your website is targeting more savvy or technical users, it stands to reason that they will be more familiar with the new extensions, understand how they work, and know that they usually don't imply any reduction in trust.



                The .io domain is a great example of a "gTLD" that is often used to target tech-savvy users. While technically not really a gTLD it does function like one in practice - standing for "input/output" - and it is popular among the tech startup community.



                Of course it's 2019 now so people may be more familiar with the new gTLDs than they were three years ago. But they likely haven't yet attained the same level of perceived trust as .com, .net, etc.



                As elbrant touched on, it kind of kills the mood when you gotta bust out your pocket notebook to give a mini-lecture on DNS resolution in the elevator. Often times it's easier to just say "our website is [blank].com".






                share|improve this answer















                If we're to go by this 2016 survey, general consumers do not trust the new gTLD domain extensions:




                We found that roughly half of consumers are uncomfortable visiting
                websites ending in new domains, and only 9% of consumers feel
                comfortable doing so.



                In terms of their overall security, almost half of respondents report feeling less secure online thanks to the
                introduction of the new gTLDs. This figure is slightly higher than last year too, showing that the wider domain
                industry hasn’t yet done a good enough job to educate the public and organisations about the benfits on offer.



                Trust in the new Internet survey 2016 discussion paper - nccgroup




                However if your website is targeting more savvy or technical users, it stands to reason that they will be more familiar with the new extensions, understand how they work, and know that they usually don't imply any reduction in trust.



                The .io domain is a great example of a "gTLD" that is often used to target tech-savvy users. While technically not really a gTLD it does function like one in practice - standing for "input/output" - and it is popular among the tech startup community.



                Of course it's 2019 now so people may be more familiar with the new gTLDs than they were three years ago. But they likely haven't yet attained the same level of perceived trust as .com, .net, etc.



                As elbrant touched on, it kind of kills the mood when you gotta bust out your pocket notebook to give a mini-lecture on DNS resolution in the elevator. Often times it's easier to just say "our website is [blank].com".







                share|improve this answer














                share|improve this answer



                share|improve this answer








                edited 10 hours ago

























                answered 11 hours ago









                Maximillian LaumeisterMaximillian Laumeister

                3,3451727




                3,3451727

























                    2














                    Explaining to someone that your site is at anything(hyphen/dash/minus)youwant.com became a nightmare (for me, personally). Avoid using anything that will put you in a position where you have to explain your DNS to a potential site visitor. It negatively affects traffic flow. Telling people your website is at domain.com requires no further information. Everyone understands it, it's comfortable. .net, .org, and some others are commonplace as well. Use the most logical domain name (preferrably with a more familiar extension).


                    Using .host makes sense to you. But there's a good chance that seeing it on your marketing materials will make everyone do a double take. Tell some of your friends what your domain will be... do they need an explanation for a site called mydomain.host (with no .com)?


                    That should tell you all you need to know.






                    share|improve this answer
























                    • If he is actually hosting something, then using the host. TLD would make sense. Otherwise it's probably a really bad idea to use it at all.

                      – Michael Hampton
                      9 hours ago
















                    2














                    Explaining to someone that your site is at anything(hyphen/dash/minus)youwant.com became a nightmare (for me, personally). Avoid using anything that will put you in a position where you have to explain your DNS to a potential site visitor. It negatively affects traffic flow. Telling people your website is at domain.com requires no further information. Everyone understands it, it's comfortable. .net, .org, and some others are commonplace as well. Use the most logical domain name (preferrably with a more familiar extension).


                    Using .host makes sense to you. But there's a good chance that seeing it on your marketing materials will make everyone do a double take. Tell some of your friends what your domain will be... do they need an explanation for a site called mydomain.host (with no .com)?


                    That should tell you all you need to know.






                    share|improve this answer
























                    • If he is actually hosting something, then using the host. TLD would make sense. Otherwise it's probably a really bad idea to use it at all.

                      – Michael Hampton
                      9 hours ago














                    2












                    2








                    2







                    Explaining to someone that your site is at anything(hyphen/dash/minus)youwant.com became a nightmare (for me, personally). Avoid using anything that will put you in a position where you have to explain your DNS to a potential site visitor. It negatively affects traffic flow. Telling people your website is at domain.com requires no further information. Everyone understands it, it's comfortable. .net, .org, and some others are commonplace as well. Use the most logical domain name (preferrably with a more familiar extension).


                    Using .host makes sense to you. But there's a good chance that seeing it on your marketing materials will make everyone do a double take. Tell some of your friends what your domain will be... do they need an explanation for a site called mydomain.host (with no .com)?


                    That should tell you all you need to know.






                    share|improve this answer













                    Explaining to someone that your site is at anything(hyphen/dash/minus)youwant.com became a nightmare (for me, personally). Avoid using anything that will put you in a position where you have to explain your DNS to a potential site visitor. It negatively affects traffic flow. Telling people your website is at domain.com requires no further information. Everyone understands it, it's comfortable. .net, .org, and some others are commonplace as well. Use the most logical domain name (preferrably with a more familiar extension).


                    Using .host makes sense to you. But there's a good chance that seeing it on your marketing materials will make everyone do a double take. Tell some of your friends what your domain will be... do they need an explanation for a site called mydomain.host (with no .com)?


                    That should tell you all you need to know.







                    share|improve this answer












                    share|improve this answer



                    share|improve this answer










                    answered 11 hours ago









                    elbrantelbrant

                    44119




                    44119













                    • If he is actually hosting something, then using the host. TLD would make sense. Otherwise it's probably a really bad idea to use it at all.

                      – Michael Hampton
                      9 hours ago



















                    • If he is actually hosting something, then using the host. TLD would make sense. Otherwise it's probably a really bad idea to use it at all.

                      – Michael Hampton
                      9 hours ago

















                    If he is actually hosting something, then using the host. TLD would make sense. Otherwise it's probably a really bad idea to use it at all.

                    – Michael Hampton
                    9 hours ago





                    If he is actually hosting something, then using the host. TLD would make sense. Otherwise it's probably a really bad idea to use it at all.

                    – Michael Hampton
                    9 hours ago










                    K Tysinger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.










                    draft saved

                    draft discarded


















                    K Tysinger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.













                    K Tysinger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.












                    K Tysinger is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
















                    Thanks for contributing an answer to Webmasters Stack Exchange!


                    • Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!

                    But avoid



                    • Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.

                    • Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.


                    To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.




                    draft saved


                    draft discarded














                    StackExchange.ready(
                    function () {
                    StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fwebmasters.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f120339%2fcom-vs-newer-domain-extensions%23new-answer', 'question_page');
                    }
                    );

                    Post as a guest















                    Required, but never shown





















































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown

































                    Required, but never shown














                    Required, but never shown












                    Required, but never shown







                    Required, but never shown







                    Popular posts from this blog

                    SQL Server 17 - Attemping to backup to remote NAS but Access is denied

                    Always On Availability groups resolving state after failover - Remote harden of transaction...

                    Restoring from pg_dump with foreign key constraints