Does YouTube delete video dislikes?












82















On some YouTube videos, particularly highly downvoted ones, I often see comments asserting that their dislikes on the video are being deleted, either by YouTube or the channel itself.



From the Gillette "We Believe" ad:




Fake dislike count: 761k of dislikes.. Real (but censored) dislikes count: 2.6M of dislikes..



Fake likes, and removing dislikes. I will Never buy Gillette again, i hope they go out of business.



I disliked the video. But, it is automatically getting undisliked. YouTube is being dishonest.



Without YouTube's cloak of censorship, this video would have about 3 million dislikes.



Anyone else noticing that the downvotes are diminishing? As I write, the downvotes are 138,153—yet when I first saw this video a few minutes ago, they were at +140,000 downvotes. Is Susan Wojcicki massaging the numbers at Gillette's urging? Inquiring minds want to know.




A post from the Google Product Forums:




What can be done to stop YouTube's moderators from deleting another 3 MILLION dislikes and another 3 MILLION comments they don't agree with for political reasons from this video?




Reddit: YouTube removing dislikes from rewind:




Don’t be dumb... youtube caches dislikes so that there main servers don’t get pounded with millions of people doing this. Dislike once and wait maybe a hour and check later, it will be there.



I just disliked, and it was at the same number they’re definitely deleting shit




Reddit: Blizzard somehow just deleted 100k dislikes from their Diablo announcement video




Bottom line: when there's a lot of automated activity, Google comes in every now and then and scrubs the data of anything that looks suspect. Not shockingly (given that 4chan has been heavily involved in the uproar) there are a lot of bots involved in this process.



People are saying maybe they cleared bots but why didn't the likes go down either, at least by SOME amount.




So my questions are:




  • Is it true that the number of dislikes on a video can and does decrease en masse over time? (It seems to be true.)

  • What might be the cause of this? Can a channel delete dislikes? Does YouTube have an automated algorithm that deletes dislikes that seem to be from bots? Does YouTube remove dislikes if you haven't watched 80% of the video? (Obviously, it's possible that users might decide to all undo their downvotes later, but that seems implausible.)










share|improve this question









New contributor




MiCl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 32





    Please only answer with actual evidence and not personal theories such as "they do it", "it's an anti-fraud script", "it's eventual consistency", etc. Skeptics is not the place for speculation and personal opinions, but for reporting facts. We delete answers which are not reference based.

    – Sklivvz
    yesterday






  • 4





    @JanDoggen this is really notable, see: google.com/search?q=diablo+disappearing+dislikes

    – Sklivvz
    yesterday






  • 3





    Note that there most probably will be no official detailed answer. Google doesn't want you to game the ranking system (which likes and dislikes are part of), so they will be intentionally vague about its inner workings. Much like SO won't tell how exactly the vote reversing script works.

    – Dmitry Grigoryev
    yesterday






  • 5





    It should be noted that Youtube would be reasonably justified in trying to reject likes/dislikes produced by "bots". Whether this is their only motivation, and whether they are doing a reasonable job of it, however, is impossible to judge from this distance.

    – Daniel R Hicks
    yesterday








  • 2





    SE does the same thing.

    – coteyr
    yesterday
















82















On some YouTube videos, particularly highly downvoted ones, I often see comments asserting that their dislikes on the video are being deleted, either by YouTube or the channel itself.



From the Gillette "We Believe" ad:




Fake dislike count: 761k of dislikes.. Real (but censored) dislikes count: 2.6M of dislikes..



Fake likes, and removing dislikes. I will Never buy Gillette again, i hope they go out of business.



I disliked the video. But, it is automatically getting undisliked. YouTube is being dishonest.



Without YouTube's cloak of censorship, this video would have about 3 million dislikes.



Anyone else noticing that the downvotes are diminishing? As I write, the downvotes are 138,153—yet when I first saw this video a few minutes ago, they were at +140,000 downvotes. Is Susan Wojcicki massaging the numbers at Gillette's urging? Inquiring minds want to know.




A post from the Google Product Forums:




What can be done to stop YouTube's moderators from deleting another 3 MILLION dislikes and another 3 MILLION comments they don't agree with for political reasons from this video?




Reddit: YouTube removing dislikes from rewind:




Don’t be dumb... youtube caches dislikes so that there main servers don’t get pounded with millions of people doing this. Dislike once and wait maybe a hour and check later, it will be there.



I just disliked, and it was at the same number they’re definitely deleting shit




Reddit: Blizzard somehow just deleted 100k dislikes from their Diablo announcement video




Bottom line: when there's a lot of automated activity, Google comes in every now and then and scrubs the data of anything that looks suspect. Not shockingly (given that 4chan has been heavily involved in the uproar) there are a lot of bots involved in this process.



People are saying maybe they cleared bots but why didn't the likes go down either, at least by SOME amount.




So my questions are:




  • Is it true that the number of dislikes on a video can and does decrease en masse over time? (It seems to be true.)

  • What might be the cause of this? Can a channel delete dislikes? Does YouTube have an automated algorithm that deletes dislikes that seem to be from bots? Does YouTube remove dislikes if you haven't watched 80% of the video? (Obviously, it's possible that users might decide to all undo their downvotes later, but that seems implausible.)










share|improve this question









New contributor




MiCl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
















  • 32





    Please only answer with actual evidence and not personal theories such as "they do it", "it's an anti-fraud script", "it's eventual consistency", etc. Skeptics is not the place for speculation and personal opinions, but for reporting facts. We delete answers which are not reference based.

    – Sklivvz
    yesterday






  • 4





    @JanDoggen this is really notable, see: google.com/search?q=diablo+disappearing+dislikes

    – Sklivvz
    yesterday






  • 3





    Note that there most probably will be no official detailed answer. Google doesn't want you to game the ranking system (which likes and dislikes are part of), so they will be intentionally vague about its inner workings. Much like SO won't tell how exactly the vote reversing script works.

    – Dmitry Grigoryev
    yesterday






  • 5





    It should be noted that Youtube would be reasonably justified in trying to reject likes/dislikes produced by "bots". Whether this is their only motivation, and whether they are doing a reasonable job of it, however, is impossible to judge from this distance.

    – Daniel R Hicks
    yesterday








  • 2





    SE does the same thing.

    – coteyr
    yesterday














82












82








82


14






On some YouTube videos, particularly highly downvoted ones, I often see comments asserting that their dislikes on the video are being deleted, either by YouTube or the channel itself.



From the Gillette "We Believe" ad:




Fake dislike count: 761k of dislikes.. Real (but censored) dislikes count: 2.6M of dislikes..



Fake likes, and removing dislikes. I will Never buy Gillette again, i hope they go out of business.



I disliked the video. But, it is automatically getting undisliked. YouTube is being dishonest.



Without YouTube's cloak of censorship, this video would have about 3 million dislikes.



Anyone else noticing that the downvotes are diminishing? As I write, the downvotes are 138,153—yet when I first saw this video a few minutes ago, they were at +140,000 downvotes. Is Susan Wojcicki massaging the numbers at Gillette's urging? Inquiring minds want to know.




A post from the Google Product Forums:




What can be done to stop YouTube's moderators from deleting another 3 MILLION dislikes and another 3 MILLION comments they don't agree with for political reasons from this video?




Reddit: YouTube removing dislikes from rewind:




Don’t be dumb... youtube caches dislikes so that there main servers don’t get pounded with millions of people doing this. Dislike once and wait maybe a hour and check later, it will be there.



I just disliked, and it was at the same number they’re definitely deleting shit




Reddit: Blizzard somehow just deleted 100k dislikes from their Diablo announcement video




Bottom line: when there's a lot of automated activity, Google comes in every now and then and scrubs the data of anything that looks suspect. Not shockingly (given that 4chan has been heavily involved in the uproar) there are a lot of bots involved in this process.



People are saying maybe they cleared bots but why didn't the likes go down either, at least by SOME amount.




So my questions are:




  • Is it true that the number of dislikes on a video can and does decrease en masse over time? (It seems to be true.)

  • What might be the cause of this? Can a channel delete dislikes? Does YouTube have an automated algorithm that deletes dislikes that seem to be from bots? Does YouTube remove dislikes if you haven't watched 80% of the video? (Obviously, it's possible that users might decide to all undo their downvotes later, but that seems implausible.)










share|improve this question









New contributor




MiCl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.












On some YouTube videos, particularly highly downvoted ones, I often see comments asserting that their dislikes on the video are being deleted, either by YouTube or the channel itself.



From the Gillette "We Believe" ad:




Fake dislike count: 761k of dislikes.. Real (but censored) dislikes count: 2.6M of dislikes..



Fake likes, and removing dislikes. I will Never buy Gillette again, i hope they go out of business.



I disliked the video. But, it is automatically getting undisliked. YouTube is being dishonest.



Without YouTube's cloak of censorship, this video would have about 3 million dislikes.



Anyone else noticing that the downvotes are diminishing? As I write, the downvotes are 138,153—yet when I first saw this video a few minutes ago, they were at +140,000 downvotes. Is Susan Wojcicki massaging the numbers at Gillette's urging? Inquiring minds want to know.




A post from the Google Product Forums:




What can be done to stop YouTube's moderators from deleting another 3 MILLION dislikes and another 3 MILLION comments they don't agree with for political reasons from this video?




Reddit: YouTube removing dislikes from rewind:




Don’t be dumb... youtube caches dislikes so that there main servers don’t get pounded with millions of people doing this. Dislike once and wait maybe a hour and check later, it will be there.



I just disliked, and it was at the same number they’re definitely deleting shit




Reddit: Blizzard somehow just deleted 100k dislikes from their Diablo announcement video




Bottom line: when there's a lot of automated activity, Google comes in every now and then and scrubs the data of anything that looks suspect. Not shockingly (given that 4chan has been heavily involved in the uproar) there are a lot of bots involved in this process.



People are saying maybe they cleared bots but why didn't the likes go down either, at least by SOME amount.




So my questions are:




  • Is it true that the number of dislikes on a video can and does decrease en masse over time? (It seems to be true.)

  • What might be the cause of this? Can a channel delete dislikes? Does YouTube have an automated algorithm that deletes dislikes that seem to be from bots? Does YouTube remove dislikes if you haven't watched 80% of the video? (Obviously, it's possible that users might decide to all undo their downvotes later, but that seems implausible.)







internet social-media google






share|improve this question









New contributor




MiCl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.











share|improve this question









New contributor




MiCl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this question




share|improve this question








edited yesterday







MiCl













New contributor




MiCl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









asked yesterday









MiClMiCl

442147




442147




New contributor




MiCl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





MiCl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






MiCl is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.








  • 32





    Please only answer with actual evidence and not personal theories such as "they do it", "it's an anti-fraud script", "it's eventual consistency", etc. Skeptics is not the place for speculation and personal opinions, but for reporting facts. We delete answers which are not reference based.

    – Sklivvz
    yesterday






  • 4





    @JanDoggen this is really notable, see: google.com/search?q=diablo+disappearing+dislikes

    – Sklivvz
    yesterday






  • 3





    Note that there most probably will be no official detailed answer. Google doesn't want you to game the ranking system (which likes and dislikes are part of), so they will be intentionally vague about its inner workings. Much like SO won't tell how exactly the vote reversing script works.

    – Dmitry Grigoryev
    yesterday






  • 5





    It should be noted that Youtube would be reasonably justified in trying to reject likes/dislikes produced by "bots". Whether this is their only motivation, and whether they are doing a reasonable job of it, however, is impossible to judge from this distance.

    – Daniel R Hicks
    yesterday








  • 2





    SE does the same thing.

    – coteyr
    yesterday














  • 32





    Please only answer with actual evidence and not personal theories such as "they do it", "it's an anti-fraud script", "it's eventual consistency", etc. Skeptics is not the place for speculation and personal opinions, but for reporting facts. We delete answers which are not reference based.

    – Sklivvz
    yesterday






  • 4





    @JanDoggen this is really notable, see: google.com/search?q=diablo+disappearing+dislikes

    – Sklivvz
    yesterday






  • 3





    Note that there most probably will be no official detailed answer. Google doesn't want you to game the ranking system (which likes and dislikes are part of), so they will be intentionally vague about its inner workings. Much like SO won't tell how exactly the vote reversing script works.

    – Dmitry Grigoryev
    yesterday






  • 5





    It should be noted that Youtube would be reasonably justified in trying to reject likes/dislikes produced by "bots". Whether this is their only motivation, and whether they are doing a reasonable job of it, however, is impossible to judge from this distance.

    – Daniel R Hicks
    yesterday








  • 2





    SE does the same thing.

    – coteyr
    yesterday








32




32





Please only answer with actual evidence and not personal theories such as "they do it", "it's an anti-fraud script", "it's eventual consistency", etc. Skeptics is not the place for speculation and personal opinions, but for reporting facts. We delete answers which are not reference based.

– Sklivvz
yesterday





Please only answer with actual evidence and not personal theories such as "they do it", "it's an anti-fraud script", "it's eventual consistency", etc. Skeptics is not the place for speculation and personal opinions, but for reporting facts. We delete answers which are not reference based.

– Sklivvz
yesterday




4




4





@JanDoggen this is really notable, see: google.com/search?q=diablo+disappearing+dislikes

– Sklivvz
yesterday





@JanDoggen this is really notable, see: google.com/search?q=diablo+disappearing+dislikes

– Sklivvz
yesterday




3




3





Note that there most probably will be no official detailed answer. Google doesn't want you to game the ranking system (which likes and dislikes are part of), so they will be intentionally vague about its inner workings. Much like SO won't tell how exactly the vote reversing script works.

– Dmitry Grigoryev
yesterday





Note that there most probably will be no official detailed answer. Google doesn't want you to game the ranking system (which likes and dislikes are part of), so they will be intentionally vague about its inner workings. Much like SO won't tell how exactly the vote reversing script works.

– Dmitry Grigoryev
yesterday




5




5





It should be noted that Youtube would be reasonably justified in trying to reject likes/dislikes produced by "bots". Whether this is their only motivation, and whether they are doing a reasonable job of it, however, is impossible to judge from this distance.

– Daniel R Hicks
yesterday







It should be noted that Youtube would be reasonably justified in trying to reject likes/dislikes produced by "bots". Whether this is their only motivation, and whether they are doing a reasonable job of it, however, is impossible to judge from this distance.

– Daniel R Hicks
yesterday






2




2





SE does the same thing.

– coteyr
yesterday





SE does the same thing.

– coteyr
yesterday










3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes


















120














YouTube itself says that it can remove dislikes. From Likes and Dislikes report:




You may see like/dislike counts change as some may be marked invalid and periodically removed from the counts. Learn more about our Likes Policy. [outdated link]







share|improve this answer
























  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – Oddthinking
    yesterday






  • 1





    I think an answer like this requires more information, as it caries possible implication that YouTube has an agenda, which may or may not be accurate. The quote contains reference to a like/dislike policy, and I would think more information should be included from that (even if you have to find a newer link.)

    – trlkly
    2 hours ago



















81














Yes, they do. They will also delete likes, as well.



However, the comments quoted and the general complaints on that video about dislikes going away are based on the claim that Gillette is either paying YouTube to delete dislikes, or that Gillette is doing it, itself.



One reason why YouTube deletes some likes and dislikes is because people often use likes, dislikes, followers, etc on social media to boost their own agendas or careers, so faking or manipulating popularity or unpopularity is pretty common.



To this end, there are business set up with individuals manning banks of devices so a person can deliver hundreds of "clicks" for a paying customer, low tech, or can set up automated programs/bots to simulate activity from different users, for the same result.



Low-tech Chinese Click Farm




To give you a general definition of clicks farms, they can be defined as:



An undercover operation in which individuals fraudulently interact with a website to artificially boost the status of a client’s website, product or service.



This basically means that somewhere in the world there are people that work behind closed doors fraudulently promoting other peoples products and services for a fee. Since the definition is fairly broad, this means that the fraudulent activity can take place on almost any platform although the most popular ones are Facebook and Instagram. It doesn’t matter if the group is selling Facebook likes of Twitter followers, they’re all classed as click farms.




PPC Protect: What is a click farm



It is in the interest of social media platforms to identify this kind of fraudulent manipulation to maintain their own integrity. So in this case, where people who don't like Gillette's ads are seeing nefarious manipulation by either Gillette, or YouTube as a paid proxy for Gillette, really it's the opposite - they are rooting out and screening nefarious and fraudulent activity that they identify.



As noted in another answer -




You may see like/dislike counts change as some may be marked invalid and periodically removed from the counts. Learn more about our Likes Policy.




YouTube: Likes and Dislikes report



Clicking on the "likes policies" hyperlink takes you to -




Artificial Traffic Spam



Anything that artificially increases the number of views, likes, comments, or other metric either through the use of automatic systems or by serving up videos to unsuspecting viewers, is against our terms. Additionally, content that solely exists to incentivize viewers for engagement (views, likes, comments, etc) is prohibited.




YouTube:Spam, deceptive practices and scams policies






share|improve this answer





















  • 3





    @Laurel - Thought it was covered in the other answer, but, you're right, it needs to be here.

    – PoloHoleSet
    yesterday






  • 1





    I definitely like how this covers the why? aspect of the like/dislike deletion. The quotes/claims in the question make it seem as though it would be YouTube doing it because of it's own agenda, but it really is a struggle to combat "fake" users trying to influence the system.

    – Broots Waymb
    yesterday






  • 4





    @Fermiparadox - In this case, more of the ones being removed as fraudulent are the dislikes, but, clearly, I'm not claiming that the dislikes, in and of themselves, are necessarily bogus. There's still over 800K of them and they nearly double the positives, and, in terms of immediate viral reaction, I'd venture to guess that a broad negative response is probably going to show up on a YouTube more quickly than a general positive one. If the people were complaining that "likes" were disappearing and trying to blame Schick or Bic for it, I'd have made the same statement in the same language.

    – PoloHoleSet
    yesterday








  • 6





    It is only the practice of hiring click farms that I'm referring to as "nefarious and fraudulent," and I'd venture to guess that usually more often associated with inflating an unwarranted "like" count for a person or product.

    – PoloHoleSet
    yesterday






  • 3





    @Fermiparadox PoloHoleSet says in their answer, correctly according to their sources, that YT removes "nefarious and fraudulent" likes/dislikes. PoloHoleSet remains neutral and does not draw any conclusions. They do not say that is the only reason, but that is not what the question asked anyway. "Do they?" > "Yes, they have said to do so for this reason". Question answered, sources provided. Asking PoloHoleSet to speculate on the reason does not seem like the spirit of this SE.

    – Belle-Sophie
    18 hours ago





















6














It's been previously documented that "glitches" can also alter the like/dislike ratio on a large scale, for example, a Justin Bieber video (including, bizarrely, adding dislikes to likes), so it's entirely possible:



https://heavy.com/social/2013/05/youtube-glitch-removes-dislikes-adds-likes/



Given YouTube control the stats behind the scenes, they can hypothetically do anything on likes/dislikes (similar to the 301 views cap). As for why it might be occurring, one can only speculate just short of an internal leak.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




SSight3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • What is the "301 views cap"?

    – MJ713
    6 hours ago











  • @MJ713 It used to be that a video on YouTube would get stuck at 301 views no matter how many there were for about a day or so. It had something to do with how often they polled it or something. I think they fixed it when they changed the maximum number of views before Gagnam Style broke it.

    – Azor Ahai
    6 hours ago



















3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes








3 Answers
3






active

oldest

votes









active

oldest

votes






active

oldest

votes









120














YouTube itself says that it can remove dislikes. From Likes and Dislikes report:




You may see like/dislike counts change as some may be marked invalid and periodically removed from the counts. Learn more about our Likes Policy. [outdated link]







share|improve this answer
























  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – Oddthinking
    yesterday






  • 1





    I think an answer like this requires more information, as it caries possible implication that YouTube has an agenda, which may or may not be accurate. The quote contains reference to a like/dislike policy, and I would think more information should be included from that (even if you have to find a newer link.)

    – trlkly
    2 hours ago
















120














YouTube itself says that it can remove dislikes. From Likes and Dislikes report:




You may see like/dislike counts change as some may be marked invalid and periodically removed from the counts. Learn more about our Likes Policy. [outdated link]







share|improve this answer
























  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – Oddthinking
    yesterday






  • 1





    I think an answer like this requires more information, as it caries possible implication that YouTube has an agenda, which may or may not be accurate. The quote contains reference to a like/dislike policy, and I would think more information should be included from that (even if you have to find a newer link.)

    – trlkly
    2 hours ago














120












120








120







YouTube itself says that it can remove dislikes. From Likes and Dislikes report:




You may see like/dislike counts change as some may be marked invalid and periodically removed from the counts. Learn more about our Likes Policy. [outdated link]







share|improve this answer













YouTube itself says that it can remove dislikes. From Likes and Dislikes report:




You may see like/dislike counts change as some may be marked invalid and periodically removed from the counts. Learn more about our Likes Policy. [outdated link]








share|improve this answer












share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer










answered yesterday









Andrew GrimmAndrew Grimm

20.9k25102294




20.9k25102294













  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – Oddthinking
    yesterday






  • 1





    I think an answer like this requires more information, as it caries possible implication that YouTube has an agenda, which may or may not be accurate. The quote contains reference to a like/dislike policy, and I would think more information should be included from that (even if you have to find a newer link.)

    – trlkly
    2 hours ago



















  • Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

    – Oddthinking
    yesterday






  • 1





    I think an answer like this requires more information, as it caries possible implication that YouTube has an agenda, which may or may not be accurate. The quote contains reference to a like/dislike policy, and I would think more information should be included from that (even if you have to find a newer link.)

    – trlkly
    2 hours ago

















Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

– Oddthinking
yesterday





Comments are not for extended discussion; this conversation has been moved to chat.

– Oddthinking
yesterday




1




1





I think an answer like this requires more information, as it caries possible implication that YouTube has an agenda, which may or may not be accurate. The quote contains reference to a like/dislike policy, and I would think more information should be included from that (even if you have to find a newer link.)

– trlkly
2 hours ago





I think an answer like this requires more information, as it caries possible implication that YouTube has an agenda, which may or may not be accurate. The quote contains reference to a like/dislike policy, and I would think more information should be included from that (even if you have to find a newer link.)

– trlkly
2 hours ago











81














Yes, they do. They will also delete likes, as well.



However, the comments quoted and the general complaints on that video about dislikes going away are based on the claim that Gillette is either paying YouTube to delete dislikes, or that Gillette is doing it, itself.



One reason why YouTube deletes some likes and dislikes is because people often use likes, dislikes, followers, etc on social media to boost their own agendas or careers, so faking or manipulating popularity or unpopularity is pretty common.



To this end, there are business set up with individuals manning banks of devices so a person can deliver hundreds of "clicks" for a paying customer, low tech, or can set up automated programs/bots to simulate activity from different users, for the same result.



Low-tech Chinese Click Farm




To give you a general definition of clicks farms, they can be defined as:



An undercover operation in which individuals fraudulently interact with a website to artificially boost the status of a client’s website, product or service.



This basically means that somewhere in the world there are people that work behind closed doors fraudulently promoting other peoples products and services for a fee. Since the definition is fairly broad, this means that the fraudulent activity can take place on almost any platform although the most popular ones are Facebook and Instagram. It doesn’t matter if the group is selling Facebook likes of Twitter followers, they’re all classed as click farms.




PPC Protect: What is a click farm



It is in the interest of social media platforms to identify this kind of fraudulent manipulation to maintain their own integrity. So in this case, where people who don't like Gillette's ads are seeing nefarious manipulation by either Gillette, or YouTube as a paid proxy for Gillette, really it's the opposite - they are rooting out and screening nefarious and fraudulent activity that they identify.



As noted in another answer -




You may see like/dislike counts change as some may be marked invalid and periodically removed from the counts. Learn more about our Likes Policy.




YouTube: Likes and Dislikes report



Clicking on the "likes policies" hyperlink takes you to -




Artificial Traffic Spam



Anything that artificially increases the number of views, likes, comments, or other metric either through the use of automatic systems or by serving up videos to unsuspecting viewers, is against our terms. Additionally, content that solely exists to incentivize viewers for engagement (views, likes, comments, etc) is prohibited.




YouTube:Spam, deceptive practices and scams policies






share|improve this answer





















  • 3





    @Laurel - Thought it was covered in the other answer, but, you're right, it needs to be here.

    – PoloHoleSet
    yesterday






  • 1





    I definitely like how this covers the why? aspect of the like/dislike deletion. The quotes/claims in the question make it seem as though it would be YouTube doing it because of it's own agenda, but it really is a struggle to combat "fake" users trying to influence the system.

    – Broots Waymb
    yesterday






  • 4





    @Fermiparadox - In this case, more of the ones being removed as fraudulent are the dislikes, but, clearly, I'm not claiming that the dislikes, in and of themselves, are necessarily bogus. There's still over 800K of them and they nearly double the positives, and, in terms of immediate viral reaction, I'd venture to guess that a broad negative response is probably going to show up on a YouTube more quickly than a general positive one. If the people were complaining that "likes" were disappearing and trying to blame Schick or Bic for it, I'd have made the same statement in the same language.

    – PoloHoleSet
    yesterday








  • 6





    It is only the practice of hiring click farms that I'm referring to as "nefarious and fraudulent," and I'd venture to guess that usually more often associated with inflating an unwarranted "like" count for a person or product.

    – PoloHoleSet
    yesterday






  • 3





    @Fermiparadox PoloHoleSet says in their answer, correctly according to their sources, that YT removes "nefarious and fraudulent" likes/dislikes. PoloHoleSet remains neutral and does not draw any conclusions. They do not say that is the only reason, but that is not what the question asked anyway. "Do they?" > "Yes, they have said to do so for this reason". Question answered, sources provided. Asking PoloHoleSet to speculate on the reason does not seem like the spirit of this SE.

    – Belle-Sophie
    18 hours ago


















81














Yes, they do. They will also delete likes, as well.



However, the comments quoted and the general complaints on that video about dislikes going away are based on the claim that Gillette is either paying YouTube to delete dislikes, or that Gillette is doing it, itself.



One reason why YouTube deletes some likes and dislikes is because people often use likes, dislikes, followers, etc on social media to boost their own agendas or careers, so faking or manipulating popularity or unpopularity is pretty common.



To this end, there are business set up with individuals manning banks of devices so a person can deliver hundreds of "clicks" for a paying customer, low tech, or can set up automated programs/bots to simulate activity from different users, for the same result.



Low-tech Chinese Click Farm




To give you a general definition of clicks farms, they can be defined as:



An undercover operation in which individuals fraudulently interact with a website to artificially boost the status of a client’s website, product or service.



This basically means that somewhere in the world there are people that work behind closed doors fraudulently promoting other peoples products and services for a fee. Since the definition is fairly broad, this means that the fraudulent activity can take place on almost any platform although the most popular ones are Facebook and Instagram. It doesn’t matter if the group is selling Facebook likes of Twitter followers, they’re all classed as click farms.




PPC Protect: What is a click farm



It is in the interest of social media platforms to identify this kind of fraudulent manipulation to maintain their own integrity. So in this case, where people who don't like Gillette's ads are seeing nefarious manipulation by either Gillette, or YouTube as a paid proxy for Gillette, really it's the opposite - they are rooting out and screening nefarious and fraudulent activity that they identify.



As noted in another answer -




You may see like/dislike counts change as some may be marked invalid and periodically removed from the counts. Learn more about our Likes Policy.




YouTube: Likes and Dislikes report



Clicking on the "likes policies" hyperlink takes you to -




Artificial Traffic Spam



Anything that artificially increases the number of views, likes, comments, or other metric either through the use of automatic systems or by serving up videos to unsuspecting viewers, is against our terms. Additionally, content that solely exists to incentivize viewers for engagement (views, likes, comments, etc) is prohibited.




YouTube:Spam, deceptive practices and scams policies






share|improve this answer





















  • 3





    @Laurel - Thought it was covered in the other answer, but, you're right, it needs to be here.

    – PoloHoleSet
    yesterday






  • 1





    I definitely like how this covers the why? aspect of the like/dislike deletion. The quotes/claims in the question make it seem as though it would be YouTube doing it because of it's own agenda, but it really is a struggle to combat "fake" users trying to influence the system.

    – Broots Waymb
    yesterday






  • 4





    @Fermiparadox - In this case, more of the ones being removed as fraudulent are the dislikes, but, clearly, I'm not claiming that the dislikes, in and of themselves, are necessarily bogus. There's still over 800K of them and they nearly double the positives, and, in terms of immediate viral reaction, I'd venture to guess that a broad negative response is probably going to show up on a YouTube more quickly than a general positive one. If the people were complaining that "likes" were disappearing and trying to blame Schick or Bic for it, I'd have made the same statement in the same language.

    – PoloHoleSet
    yesterday








  • 6





    It is only the practice of hiring click farms that I'm referring to as "nefarious and fraudulent," and I'd venture to guess that usually more often associated with inflating an unwarranted "like" count for a person or product.

    – PoloHoleSet
    yesterday






  • 3





    @Fermiparadox PoloHoleSet says in their answer, correctly according to their sources, that YT removes "nefarious and fraudulent" likes/dislikes. PoloHoleSet remains neutral and does not draw any conclusions. They do not say that is the only reason, but that is not what the question asked anyway. "Do they?" > "Yes, they have said to do so for this reason". Question answered, sources provided. Asking PoloHoleSet to speculate on the reason does not seem like the spirit of this SE.

    – Belle-Sophie
    18 hours ago
















81












81








81







Yes, they do. They will also delete likes, as well.



However, the comments quoted and the general complaints on that video about dislikes going away are based on the claim that Gillette is either paying YouTube to delete dislikes, or that Gillette is doing it, itself.



One reason why YouTube deletes some likes and dislikes is because people often use likes, dislikes, followers, etc on social media to boost their own agendas or careers, so faking or manipulating popularity or unpopularity is pretty common.



To this end, there are business set up with individuals manning banks of devices so a person can deliver hundreds of "clicks" for a paying customer, low tech, or can set up automated programs/bots to simulate activity from different users, for the same result.



Low-tech Chinese Click Farm




To give you a general definition of clicks farms, they can be defined as:



An undercover operation in which individuals fraudulently interact with a website to artificially boost the status of a client’s website, product or service.



This basically means that somewhere in the world there are people that work behind closed doors fraudulently promoting other peoples products and services for a fee. Since the definition is fairly broad, this means that the fraudulent activity can take place on almost any platform although the most popular ones are Facebook and Instagram. It doesn’t matter if the group is selling Facebook likes of Twitter followers, they’re all classed as click farms.




PPC Protect: What is a click farm



It is in the interest of social media platforms to identify this kind of fraudulent manipulation to maintain their own integrity. So in this case, where people who don't like Gillette's ads are seeing nefarious manipulation by either Gillette, or YouTube as a paid proxy for Gillette, really it's the opposite - they are rooting out and screening nefarious and fraudulent activity that they identify.



As noted in another answer -




You may see like/dislike counts change as some may be marked invalid and periodically removed from the counts. Learn more about our Likes Policy.




YouTube: Likes and Dislikes report



Clicking on the "likes policies" hyperlink takes you to -




Artificial Traffic Spam



Anything that artificially increases the number of views, likes, comments, or other metric either through the use of automatic systems or by serving up videos to unsuspecting viewers, is against our terms. Additionally, content that solely exists to incentivize viewers for engagement (views, likes, comments, etc) is prohibited.




YouTube:Spam, deceptive practices and scams policies






share|improve this answer















Yes, they do. They will also delete likes, as well.



However, the comments quoted and the general complaints on that video about dislikes going away are based on the claim that Gillette is either paying YouTube to delete dislikes, or that Gillette is doing it, itself.



One reason why YouTube deletes some likes and dislikes is because people often use likes, dislikes, followers, etc on social media to boost their own agendas or careers, so faking or manipulating popularity or unpopularity is pretty common.



To this end, there are business set up with individuals manning banks of devices so a person can deliver hundreds of "clicks" for a paying customer, low tech, or can set up automated programs/bots to simulate activity from different users, for the same result.



Low-tech Chinese Click Farm




To give you a general definition of clicks farms, they can be defined as:



An undercover operation in which individuals fraudulently interact with a website to artificially boost the status of a client’s website, product or service.



This basically means that somewhere in the world there are people that work behind closed doors fraudulently promoting other peoples products and services for a fee. Since the definition is fairly broad, this means that the fraudulent activity can take place on almost any platform although the most popular ones are Facebook and Instagram. It doesn’t matter if the group is selling Facebook likes of Twitter followers, they’re all classed as click farms.




PPC Protect: What is a click farm



It is in the interest of social media platforms to identify this kind of fraudulent manipulation to maintain their own integrity. So in this case, where people who don't like Gillette's ads are seeing nefarious manipulation by either Gillette, or YouTube as a paid proxy for Gillette, really it's the opposite - they are rooting out and screening nefarious and fraudulent activity that they identify.



As noted in another answer -




You may see like/dislike counts change as some may be marked invalid and periodically removed from the counts. Learn more about our Likes Policy.




YouTube: Likes and Dislikes report



Clicking on the "likes policies" hyperlink takes you to -




Artificial Traffic Spam



Anything that artificially increases the number of views, likes, comments, or other metric either through the use of automatic systems or by serving up videos to unsuspecting viewers, is against our terms. Additionally, content that solely exists to incentivize viewers for engagement (views, likes, comments, etc) is prohibited.




YouTube:Spam, deceptive practices and scams policies







share|improve this answer














share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer








edited yesterday

























answered yesterday









PoloHoleSetPoloHoleSet

7,72622339




7,72622339








  • 3





    @Laurel - Thought it was covered in the other answer, but, you're right, it needs to be here.

    – PoloHoleSet
    yesterday






  • 1





    I definitely like how this covers the why? aspect of the like/dislike deletion. The quotes/claims in the question make it seem as though it would be YouTube doing it because of it's own agenda, but it really is a struggle to combat "fake" users trying to influence the system.

    – Broots Waymb
    yesterday






  • 4





    @Fermiparadox - In this case, more of the ones being removed as fraudulent are the dislikes, but, clearly, I'm not claiming that the dislikes, in and of themselves, are necessarily bogus. There's still over 800K of them and they nearly double the positives, and, in terms of immediate viral reaction, I'd venture to guess that a broad negative response is probably going to show up on a YouTube more quickly than a general positive one. If the people were complaining that "likes" were disappearing and trying to blame Schick or Bic for it, I'd have made the same statement in the same language.

    – PoloHoleSet
    yesterday








  • 6





    It is only the practice of hiring click farms that I'm referring to as "nefarious and fraudulent," and I'd venture to guess that usually more often associated with inflating an unwarranted "like" count for a person or product.

    – PoloHoleSet
    yesterday






  • 3





    @Fermiparadox PoloHoleSet says in their answer, correctly according to their sources, that YT removes "nefarious and fraudulent" likes/dislikes. PoloHoleSet remains neutral and does not draw any conclusions. They do not say that is the only reason, but that is not what the question asked anyway. "Do they?" > "Yes, they have said to do so for this reason". Question answered, sources provided. Asking PoloHoleSet to speculate on the reason does not seem like the spirit of this SE.

    – Belle-Sophie
    18 hours ago
















  • 3





    @Laurel - Thought it was covered in the other answer, but, you're right, it needs to be here.

    – PoloHoleSet
    yesterday






  • 1





    I definitely like how this covers the why? aspect of the like/dislike deletion. The quotes/claims in the question make it seem as though it would be YouTube doing it because of it's own agenda, but it really is a struggle to combat "fake" users trying to influence the system.

    – Broots Waymb
    yesterday






  • 4





    @Fermiparadox - In this case, more of the ones being removed as fraudulent are the dislikes, but, clearly, I'm not claiming that the dislikes, in and of themselves, are necessarily bogus. There's still over 800K of them and they nearly double the positives, and, in terms of immediate viral reaction, I'd venture to guess that a broad negative response is probably going to show up on a YouTube more quickly than a general positive one. If the people were complaining that "likes" were disappearing and trying to blame Schick or Bic for it, I'd have made the same statement in the same language.

    – PoloHoleSet
    yesterday








  • 6





    It is only the practice of hiring click farms that I'm referring to as "nefarious and fraudulent," and I'd venture to guess that usually more often associated with inflating an unwarranted "like" count for a person or product.

    – PoloHoleSet
    yesterday






  • 3





    @Fermiparadox PoloHoleSet says in their answer, correctly according to their sources, that YT removes "nefarious and fraudulent" likes/dislikes. PoloHoleSet remains neutral and does not draw any conclusions. They do not say that is the only reason, but that is not what the question asked anyway. "Do they?" > "Yes, they have said to do so for this reason". Question answered, sources provided. Asking PoloHoleSet to speculate on the reason does not seem like the spirit of this SE.

    – Belle-Sophie
    18 hours ago










3




3





@Laurel - Thought it was covered in the other answer, but, you're right, it needs to be here.

– PoloHoleSet
yesterday





@Laurel - Thought it was covered in the other answer, but, you're right, it needs to be here.

– PoloHoleSet
yesterday




1




1





I definitely like how this covers the why? aspect of the like/dislike deletion. The quotes/claims in the question make it seem as though it would be YouTube doing it because of it's own agenda, but it really is a struggle to combat "fake" users trying to influence the system.

– Broots Waymb
yesterday





I definitely like how this covers the why? aspect of the like/dislike deletion. The quotes/claims in the question make it seem as though it would be YouTube doing it because of it's own agenda, but it really is a struggle to combat "fake" users trying to influence the system.

– Broots Waymb
yesterday




4




4





@Fermiparadox - In this case, more of the ones being removed as fraudulent are the dislikes, but, clearly, I'm not claiming that the dislikes, in and of themselves, are necessarily bogus. There's still over 800K of them and they nearly double the positives, and, in terms of immediate viral reaction, I'd venture to guess that a broad negative response is probably going to show up on a YouTube more quickly than a general positive one. If the people were complaining that "likes" were disappearing and trying to blame Schick or Bic for it, I'd have made the same statement in the same language.

– PoloHoleSet
yesterday







@Fermiparadox - In this case, more of the ones being removed as fraudulent are the dislikes, but, clearly, I'm not claiming that the dislikes, in and of themselves, are necessarily bogus. There's still over 800K of them and they nearly double the positives, and, in terms of immediate viral reaction, I'd venture to guess that a broad negative response is probably going to show up on a YouTube more quickly than a general positive one. If the people were complaining that "likes" were disappearing and trying to blame Schick or Bic for it, I'd have made the same statement in the same language.

– PoloHoleSet
yesterday






6




6





It is only the practice of hiring click farms that I'm referring to as "nefarious and fraudulent," and I'd venture to guess that usually more often associated with inflating an unwarranted "like" count for a person or product.

– PoloHoleSet
yesterday





It is only the practice of hiring click farms that I'm referring to as "nefarious and fraudulent," and I'd venture to guess that usually more often associated with inflating an unwarranted "like" count for a person or product.

– PoloHoleSet
yesterday




3




3





@Fermiparadox PoloHoleSet says in their answer, correctly according to their sources, that YT removes "nefarious and fraudulent" likes/dislikes. PoloHoleSet remains neutral and does not draw any conclusions. They do not say that is the only reason, but that is not what the question asked anyway. "Do they?" > "Yes, they have said to do so for this reason". Question answered, sources provided. Asking PoloHoleSet to speculate on the reason does not seem like the spirit of this SE.

– Belle-Sophie
18 hours ago







@Fermiparadox PoloHoleSet says in their answer, correctly according to their sources, that YT removes "nefarious and fraudulent" likes/dislikes. PoloHoleSet remains neutral and does not draw any conclusions. They do not say that is the only reason, but that is not what the question asked anyway. "Do they?" > "Yes, they have said to do so for this reason". Question answered, sources provided. Asking PoloHoleSet to speculate on the reason does not seem like the spirit of this SE.

– Belle-Sophie
18 hours ago













6














It's been previously documented that "glitches" can also alter the like/dislike ratio on a large scale, for example, a Justin Bieber video (including, bizarrely, adding dislikes to likes), so it's entirely possible:



https://heavy.com/social/2013/05/youtube-glitch-removes-dislikes-adds-likes/



Given YouTube control the stats behind the scenes, they can hypothetically do anything on likes/dislikes (similar to the 301 views cap). As for why it might be occurring, one can only speculate just short of an internal leak.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




SSight3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • What is the "301 views cap"?

    – MJ713
    6 hours ago











  • @MJ713 It used to be that a video on YouTube would get stuck at 301 views no matter how many there were for about a day or so. It had something to do with how often they polled it or something. I think they fixed it when they changed the maximum number of views before Gagnam Style broke it.

    – Azor Ahai
    6 hours ago
















6














It's been previously documented that "glitches" can also alter the like/dislike ratio on a large scale, for example, a Justin Bieber video (including, bizarrely, adding dislikes to likes), so it's entirely possible:



https://heavy.com/social/2013/05/youtube-glitch-removes-dislikes-adds-likes/



Given YouTube control the stats behind the scenes, they can hypothetically do anything on likes/dislikes (similar to the 301 views cap). As for why it might be occurring, one can only speculate just short of an internal leak.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




SSight3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





















  • What is the "301 views cap"?

    – MJ713
    6 hours ago











  • @MJ713 It used to be that a video on YouTube would get stuck at 301 views no matter how many there were for about a day or so. It had something to do with how often they polled it or something. I think they fixed it when they changed the maximum number of views before Gagnam Style broke it.

    – Azor Ahai
    6 hours ago














6












6








6







It's been previously documented that "glitches" can also alter the like/dislike ratio on a large scale, for example, a Justin Bieber video (including, bizarrely, adding dislikes to likes), so it's entirely possible:



https://heavy.com/social/2013/05/youtube-glitch-removes-dislikes-adds-likes/



Given YouTube control the stats behind the scenes, they can hypothetically do anything on likes/dislikes (similar to the 301 views cap). As for why it might be occurring, one can only speculate just short of an internal leak.






share|improve this answer








New contributor




SSight3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.










It's been previously documented that "glitches" can also alter the like/dislike ratio on a large scale, for example, a Justin Bieber video (including, bizarrely, adding dislikes to likes), so it's entirely possible:



https://heavy.com/social/2013/05/youtube-glitch-removes-dislikes-adds-likes/



Given YouTube control the stats behind the scenes, they can hypothetically do anything on likes/dislikes (similar to the 301 views cap). As for why it might be occurring, one can only speculate just short of an internal leak.







share|improve this answer








New contributor




SSight3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









share|improve this answer



share|improve this answer






New contributor




SSight3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.









answered yesterday









SSight3SSight3

1612




1612




New contributor




SSight3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.





New contributor





SSight3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.






SSight3 is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.













  • What is the "301 views cap"?

    – MJ713
    6 hours ago











  • @MJ713 It used to be that a video on YouTube would get stuck at 301 views no matter how many there were for about a day or so. It had something to do with how often they polled it or something. I think they fixed it when they changed the maximum number of views before Gagnam Style broke it.

    – Azor Ahai
    6 hours ago



















  • What is the "301 views cap"?

    – MJ713
    6 hours ago











  • @MJ713 It used to be that a video on YouTube would get stuck at 301 views no matter how many there were for about a day or so. It had something to do with how often they polled it or something. I think they fixed it when they changed the maximum number of views before Gagnam Style broke it.

    – Azor Ahai
    6 hours ago

















What is the "301 views cap"?

– MJ713
6 hours ago





What is the "301 views cap"?

– MJ713
6 hours ago













@MJ713 It used to be that a video on YouTube would get stuck at 301 views no matter how many there were for about a day or so. It had something to do with how often they polled it or something. I think they fixed it when they changed the maximum number of views before Gagnam Style broke it.

– Azor Ahai
6 hours ago





@MJ713 It used to be that a video on YouTube would get stuck at 301 views no matter how many there were for about a day or so. It had something to do with how often they polled it or something. I think they fixed it when they changed the maximum number of views before Gagnam Style broke it.

– Azor Ahai
6 hours ago



Popular posts from this blog

SQL Server 17 - Attemping to backup to remote NAS but Access is denied

Always On Availability groups resolving state after failover - Remote harden of transaction...

Restoring from pg_dump with foreign key constraints