Handling waitress unclaimed pay from three years ago
Each week our boss gives us payslips with our hours worked and we can cash them right at the place of work. Pretty simple. You get a receipt for your hours worked for the week and a slip to turn into the cash register for payment. If a worker needs a regular "paycheck" instead of cash, that is also arranged. Or if they want their money auto-deposited, that is another option available.
So, we have this one waitress that has worked there for 7 years. She comes in the other day with some of these "payslips" that are almost three years old. She said she found them in an old purse in her closet. She never cashed them in. Now she wants me to bring them into the office to see if they are any good.
How is this situation handled? The amount of all the slips is almost $300.00.
united-states employment bookkeeping paycheck
edited Jan 15 at 0:29
Chris W. Rea
26.5k1586174
asked Jan 14 at 22:24
DianaDiana
342123
New contributor
Diana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
|
show 7 more comments
Each week our boss gives us payslips with our hours worked and we can cash them right at the place of work. Pretty simple. You get a receipt for your hours worked for the week and a slip to turn into the cash register for payment. If a worker needs a regular "paycheck" instead of cash, that is also arranged. Or if they want their money auto-deposited, that is another option available.
So, we have this one waitress that has worked there for 7 years. She comes in the other day with some of these "payslips" that are almost three years old. She said she found them in an old purse in her closet. She never cashed them in. Now she wants me to bring them into the office to see if they are any good.
How is this situation handled? The amount of all the slips is almost $300.00.
united-states employment bookkeeping paycheck
edited Jan 15 at 0:29
Chris W. Rea
26.5k1586174
asked Jan 14 at 22:24
DianaDiana
342123
New contributor
Diana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
16
Do the payslips have an expiry date?
– Hart CO
Jan 14 at 23:45
122
I don't understand why there's any question? If this employee is a good employee (and after working there for 7 years, she must be), unless you find her to be particularly untrustworthy, just pay her - if she's working full time, $300 must be less than 1% of her annual pay, so even if she's scamming you (on purpose or by accident), it's not a lot of money.
– Johnny
Jan 15 at 5:09
69
@Johnny The only question I can see is "I don't have an accounting system, so what do I do now something has happened and I need one?" The only answer IMO is "be thankful this is only an issue over allegedly unpaid bills for $300, and not for $300,000." At least it's not worth going to court over $300, though she can still bad mouth you and you don't have many options to redress that - firing a long-term employer because (in her opinion) you never paid her wages isn't going to be good business publicity.
– alephzero
Jan 15 at 14:14
28
Surely this restaurant pays taxes? So, presumably, it has someone with the title “accountant”? Who has head of double entry bookkeeping? What’s the plan if the restaurant gets audited?
– Mawg
Jan 15 at 14:17
19
@Mawg I'm guessing that an employer that handles paychecks in this fashion is paying these employees under the table. Handing out cash in exchange for time-slips seems to me that they are not reporting these wages.
– Rich
Jan 15 at 15:41
|
show 7 more comments
Each week our boss gives us payslips with our hours worked and we can cash them right at the place of work. Pretty simple. You get a receipt for your hours worked for the week and a slip to turn into the cash register for payment. If a worker needs a regular "paycheck" instead of cash, that is also arranged. Or if they want their money auto-deposited, that is another option available.
So, we have this one waitress that has worked there for 7 years. She comes in the other day with some of these "payslips" that are almost three years old. She said she found them in an old purse in her closet. She never cashed them in. Now she wants me to bring them into the office to see if they are any good.
How is this situation handled? The amount of all the slips is almost $300.00.
united-states employment bookkeeping paycheck
edited Jan 15 at 0:29
Chris W. Rea
26.5k1586174
asked Jan 14 at 22:24
DianaDiana
342123
New contributor
Diana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Each week our boss gives us payslips with our hours worked and we can cash them right at the place of work. Pretty simple. You get a receipt for your hours worked for the week and a slip to turn into the cash register for payment. If a worker needs a regular "paycheck" instead of cash, that is also arranged. Or if they want their money auto-deposited, that is another option available.
So, we have this one waitress that has worked there for 7 years. She comes in the other day with some of these "payslips" that are almost three years old. She said she found them in an old purse in her closet. She never cashed them in. Now she wants me to bring them into the office to see if they are any good.
How is this situation handled? The amount of all the slips is almost $300.00.
united-states employment bookkeeping paycheck
united-states employment bookkeeping paycheck
edited Jan 15 at 0:29
Chris W. Rea
26.5k1586174
asked Jan 14 at 22:24
DianaDiana
342123
New contributor
Diana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Jan 15 at 0:29
Chris W. Rea
26.5k1586174
asked Jan 14 at 22:24
DianaDiana
342123
New contributor
Diana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
edited Jan 15 at 0:29
Chris W. Rea
26.5k1586174
edited Jan 15 at 0:29
Chris W. Rea
26.5k1586174
edited Jan 15 at 0:29
Chris W. Rea
26.5k1586174
26.5k1586174
asked Jan 14 at 22:24
DianaDiana
342123
New contributor
Diana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
asked Jan 14 at 22:24
DianaDiana
342123
asked Jan 14 at 22:24
DianaDiana
342123
342123
New contributor
Diana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
New contributor
Diana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
Diana is a new contributor to this site. Take care in asking for clarification, commenting, and answering.
Check out our Code of Conduct.
16
Do the payslips have an expiry date?
– Hart CO
Jan 14 at 23:45
122
I don't understand why there's any question? If this employee is a good employee (and after working there for 7 years, she must be), unless you find her to be particularly untrustworthy, just pay her - if she's working full time, $300 must be less than 1% of her annual pay, so even if she's scamming you (on purpose or by accident), it's not a lot of money.
– Johnny
Jan 15 at 5:09
69
@Johnny The only question I can see is "I don't have an accounting system, so what do I do now something has happened and I need one?" The only answer IMO is "be thankful this is only an issue over allegedly unpaid bills for $300, and not for $300,000." At least it's not worth going to court over $300, though she can still bad mouth you and you don't have many options to redress that - firing a long-term employer because (in her opinion) you never paid her wages isn't going to be good business publicity.
– alephzero
Jan 15 at 14:14
28
Surely this restaurant pays taxes? So, presumably, it has someone with the title “accountant”? Who has head of double entry bookkeeping? What’s the plan if the restaurant gets audited?
– Mawg
Jan 15 at 14:17
19
@Mawg I'm guessing that an employer that handles paychecks in this fashion is paying these employees under the table. Handing out cash in exchange for time-slips seems to me that they are not reporting these wages.
– Rich
Jan 15 at 15:41
|
show 7 more comments
16
Do the payslips have an expiry date?
– Hart CO
Jan 14 at 23:45
122
I don't understand why there's any question? If this employee is a good employee (and after working there for 7 years, she must be), unless you find her to be particularly untrustworthy, just pay her - if she's working full time, $300 must be less than 1% of her annual pay, so even if she's scamming you (on purpose or by accident), it's not a lot of money.
– Johnny
Jan 15 at 5:09
69
@Johnny The only question I can see is "I don't have an accounting system, so what do I do now something has happened and I need one?" The only answer IMO is "be thankful this is only an issue over allegedly unpaid bills for $300, and not for $300,000." At least it's not worth going to court over $300, though she can still bad mouth you and you don't have many options to redress that - firing a long-term employer because (in her opinion) you never paid her wages isn't going to be good business publicity.
– alephzero
Jan 15 at 14:14
28
Surely this restaurant pays taxes? So, presumably, it has someone with the title “accountant”? Who has head of double entry bookkeeping? What’s the plan if the restaurant gets audited?
– Mawg
Jan 15 at 14:17
19
@Mawg I'm guessing that an employer that handles paychecks in this fashion is paying these employees under the table. Handing out cash in exchange for time-slips seems to me that they are not reporting these wages.
– Rich
Jan 15 at 15:41
16
16
Do the payslips have an expiry date?
– Hart CO
Jan 14 at 23:45
Do the payslips have an expiry date?
– Hart CO
Jan 14 at 23:45
122
122
I don't understand why there's any question? If this employee is a good employee (and after working there for 7 years, she must be), unless you find her to be particularly untrustworthy, just pay her - if she's working full time, $300 must be less than 1% of her annual pay, so even if she's scamming you (on purpose or by accident), it's not a lot of money.
– Johnny
Jan 15 at 5:09
I don't understand why there's any question? If this employee is a good employee (and after working there for 7 years, she must be), unless you find her to be particularly untrustworthy, just pay her - if she's working full time, $300 must be less than 1% of her annual pay, so even if she's scamming you (on purpose or by accident), it's not a lot of money.
– Johnny
Jan 15 at 5:09
69
69
@Johnny The only question I can see is "I don't have an accounting system, so what do I do now something has happened and I need one?" The only answer IMO is "be thankful this is only an issue over allegedly unpaid bills for $300, and not for $300,000." At least it's not worth going to court over $300, though she can still bad mouth you and you don't have many options to redress that - firing a long-term employer because (in her opinion) you never paid her wages isn't going to be good business publicity.
– alephzero
Jan 15 at 14:14
@Johnny The only question I can see is "I don't have an accounting system, so what do I do now something has happened and I need one?" The only answer IMO is "be thankful this is only an issue over allegedly unpaid bills for $300, and not for $300,000." At least it's not worth going to court over $300, though she can still bad mouth you and you don't have many options to redress that - firing a long-term employer because (in her opinion) you never paid her wages isn't going to be good business publicity.
– alephzero
Jan 15 at 14:14
28
28
Surely this restaurant pays taxes? So, presumably, it has someone with the title “accountant”? Who has head of double entry bookkeeping? What’s the plan if the restaurant gets audited?
– Mawg
Jan 15 at 14:17
Surely this restaurant pays taxes? So, presumably, it has someone with the title “accountant”? Who has head of double entry bookkeeping? What’s the plan if the restaurant gets audited?
– Mawg
Jan 15 at 14:17
19
19
@Mawg I'm guessing that an employer that handles paychecks in this fashion is paying these employees under the table. Handing out cash in exchange for time-slips seems to me that they are not reporting these wages.
– Rich
Jan 15 at 15:41
@Mawg I'm guessing that an employer that handles paychecks in this fashion is paying these employees under the table. Handing out cash in exchange for time-slips seems to me that they are not reporting these wages.
– Rich
Jan 15 at 15:41
|
show 7 more comments
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
You (or whoever is responsible for that) look into the old books to see if the payslips were paid out. There should also be a folder with old payslips where the ones in question should be missing.
After that, the person in charge of cashing them in can safely do so.
If there is no such thing, you(r manager) should cash in the slips as the price for an important lesson, start doing normal bookkeeping and be happy the business has survived for so long. No business should be giving out thousands of dollars over years to employees without any proof of where that money went or even how much money went out.
answered Jan 15 at 10:17
DonQuiKongDonQuiKong
1,1891412
41
This. Surely there's a easily accessible paper trail that would reveal whether any payment was made.
– Jack Aidley
Jan 15 at 11:55
10
Best case the books should show a liability of wages not yet claimed (which is created when the payslips are made and normally moves on to costs for wages once paid out).
– cbeleites
Jan 15 at 12:37
56
Just be thankful it's an employee asking questions, and not the IRS
– Mawg
Jan 15 at 14:14
11
@JackAidley Many small businesses don't learn the value of the paper trail until they are burned by the lack of it.
– Myles
Jan 15 at 18:28
4
At which point the IRS is allowed to estimate your actual income and levy tax upon it. I doubt that they often underestimate. This one is unlikely to end well.
– Mawg
2 days ago
add a comment |
Talk to the owner or the manager. You don't want to be responsible for paying money for a payslip that already has been paid.
As you have noted this is highly unusual for somebody to hold onto these payslips. While it looks like they were never paid there might be some other story. Maybe they were lost and the restaurant replaced them, and they will no longer honor the original ones.
Don't pay any money until somebody with additional authority has approved them and takes responsibility for the situation.
answered Jan 15 at 0:10
mhoran_psprepmhoran_psprep
66.8k894172
3
Right on. There are so many unknowns here, you don't want to be the one making the calls if it could mean your butt on the line (assuming of course that OP isn't able to verify this pay history themselves).
– Broots Waymb
Jan 15 at 14:29
3
The other day I found $80 in the pocket of pants that I have not worn for over five years, so it might not be that unusual.
– trognanders
19 hours ago
add a comment |
Now she wants me to bring them into the office to see if they are any good.
Why are you invovled?
Why isn't she coming to the office?
How is this situation handled?
Give them back to her and let her bring them in.
Explain that you aren't authorized to cash anything except the ones that you hand out weekly, and let her take it up with someone senior to you (or someone like an accountant who can research this).
answered Jan 15 at 14:21
J. Chris ComptonJ. Chris Compton
6818
2
We don't know the asker's position in the business. If they're a shift supervisor or the cashier or some similar position, it's reasonable for the waitress to go to them.
– Mark
Jan 15 at 22:00
8
@Mark The original post was "Diana Head Waitress". My advice is that a head waitress shouldn't deal with three year old pay vouchers. Lots of things could be in play after three years. An example is the state's escheatment laws. (click on the "Edited X hours ago" to see the edits)
– J. Chris Compton
Jan 15 at 22:12
3
Well, I'm guessing the OP is involved because they have some level of management responsibility over the waitress, the process described for getting paid seems to be go to a random cash drawer, exchange slip for money and the waitress knows that just doing that this time around will be problematic and is smartly going up the chain to someone who can figure out what exactly should be done. Hierarchy typically has you report to your immediate supervisor with such questions rather than knocking immediately on the CEO's door.
– iheanyi
yesterday
@iheanyi What you posted is correct in general about hierarchy - and my advice is step aside / pass her up the chain. Honestly, I smell a rat because the other employee wants OP to bring them in for her. If it was up-and-up she would be asking this question at the workplace. The whole "cash your own payslip" also seems fishy to me, (two sets of books?) but that's not her question.
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
1
@iheanyi Maybe we are saying the same thing? I said that OP should "Give them back to her and let her bring them in." By that I meant that the OP should give the old pay-stubs back if she has them, and tell the other employee to talk to someone else above her. Whatever OP's role is, and that is unclear, her role doesn't seem to involve payroll (except passing out the checks and getting signatures).
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
If the payslips are genuine, and if you're confident there is no scam going on, then you should pay. To be safe, you should check with your manager first.
edited Jan 14 at 23:49
JoeTaxpayer♦
143k22229461
answered Jan 14 at 23:44
gnasher729gnasher729
9,08921228
2
I would say this is very bad advice. If this is a scam, being "confident there is no scam going on" is exactly what the scammer is banking on. Don't assume anything, and take this higher up.
– ohyeah
Jan 15 at 8:00
3
@ohyeah I agree that the individual asking the question shouldn't just pay up on the strength of their own "confidence", but it's absolutely worth remembering that if the story is correct then this is money that the employee is owed in exchange for work already done, so in that respect it absolutely should be paid up when it is verified.
– Rob Moir
Jan 15 at 8:15
Even if there's no scam, there could be a mistake. The waitress might have lost these pay stubs, requested replacements at the time, and then forgotten about the whole thing by now.
– ruakh
Jan 16 at 0:42
@ohyeah aren't they in the same position with regular payslips? Assuming there's no scam going on and not verifying with management that the payslips contain accurate information? Barn door is already open.
– iheanyi
yesterday
add a comment |
Be aware that depending on which US state you are in, it is quite possible that these payslips are no longer valid, even if they are genuine.
It also matters whether the waitress has a written work contract. Depending on these parameters, the corresponding statue of limitations may say anything from "1 year" to "20 years".
So, in addition to making sure that the payslips are genuine, and in addition to cross-checking the books for a double charge-in, you should first of all be sure the period of limitation for your specific scenario hasn't passed (this is faster and easier to do than checking the books, if you're lucky you need not do that, after all).
Failure to do so may end with you having to explain to your manager, and probably refunding the money, if this goes the wrong way.
answered Jan 15 at 13:51
DamonDamon
1073
27
Yes, screwing a long term employee out of 300 dollars due to legal reason might be easier. But it's definitly not wiser. And economically the cost of an unhappy employee and a bad reputation will cost a lot more.
– DonQuiKong
Jan 15 at 14:18
11
If the owner has any idea about leading a company, they will see it that way. I don't understand the communism part, it doesn't seem to have any connection to the rest of my comment, your answer or the question. Can you explain?
– DonQuiKong
Jan 15 at 14:38
9
Employee worked, didn't get paid. I don't see how this situation ends in any way other than 'employee gets paid'. It's not about whether or not you need to honor these payslips. The employee should have been paid. It's not their fault (legally) that they weren't.
– xyious
Jan 15 at 16:01
2
@Damon, in every state I've looked at, the money is hers. You may have been obliged to turn it over to the state's "unclaimed property" office after a period of time, but there are no grounds under which you can keep the money.
– Mark
Jan 15 at 22:02
6
@DonQuiKong, in the US, this situation isn't considered a debt, it's considered unclaimed property or similar. There's no time limit on this -- theoretically, her great-grandchildren could find those unclaimed pay slips and redeem them (if everyone's following the rules, the company will have turned the money over to the state, and her heirs won't need to track down the successor to a company that went out of business a century ago).
– Mark
Jan 15 at 22:07
|
show 5 more comments
Your Answer
StackExchange.ready(function() {
var channelOptions = {
tags: "".split(" "),
id: "93"
};
initTagRenderer("".split(" "), "".split(" "), channelOptions);
StackExchange.using("externalEditor", function() {
// Have to fire editor after snippets, if snippets enabled
if (StackExchange.settings.snippets.snippetsEnabled) {
StackExchange.using("snippets", function() {
createEditor();
});
}
else {
createEditor();
}
});
function createEditor() {
StackExchange.prepareEditor({
heartbeatType: 'answer',
autoActivateHeartbeat: false,
convertImagesToLinks: true,
noModals: true,
showLowRepImageUploadWarning: true,
reputationToPostImages: 10,
bindNavPrevention: true,
postfix: "",
imageUploader: {
brandingHtml: "Powered by u003ca class="icon-imgur-white" href="https://imgur.com/"u003eu003c/au003e",
contentPolicyHtml: "User contributions licensed under u003ca href="https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/"u003ecc by-sa 3.0 with attribution requiredu003c/au003e u003ca href="https://stackoverflow.com/legal/content-policy"u003e(content policy)u003c/au003e",
allowUrls: true
},
noCode: true, onDemand: true,
discardSelector: ".discard-answer"
,immediatelyShowMarkdownHelp:true
});
}
});
Diana is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f104062%2fhandling-waitress-unclaimed-pay-from-three-years-ago%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
5 Answers
5
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
active
oldest
votes
You (or whoever is responsible for that) look into the old books to see if the payslips were paid out. There should also be a folder with old payslips where the ones in question should be missing.
After that, the person in charge of cashing them in can safely do so.
If there is no such thing, you(r manager) should cash in the slips as the price for an important lesson, start doing normal bookkeeping and be happy the business has survived for so long. No business should be giving out thousands of dollars over years to employees without any proof of where that money went or even how much money went out.
answered Jan 15 at 10:17
DonQuiKongDonQuiKong
1,1891412
41
This. Surely there's a easily accessible paper trail that would reveal whether any payment was made.
– Jack Aidley
Jan 15 at 11:55
10
Best case the books should show a liability of wages not yet claimed (which is created when the payslips are made and normally moves on to costs for wages once paid out).
– cbeleites
Jan 15 at 12:37
56
Just be thankful it's an employee asking questions, and not the IRS
– Mawg
Jan 15 at 14:14
11
@JackAidley Many small businesses don't learn the value of the paper trail until they are burned by the lack of it.
– Myles
Jan 15 at 18:28
4
At which point the IRS is allowed to estimate your actual income and levy tax upon it. I doubt that they often underestimate. This one is unlikely to end well.
– Mawg
2 days ago
add a comment |
You (or whoever is responsible for that) look into the old books to see if the payslips were paid out. There should also be a folder with old payslips where the ones in question should be missing.
After that, the person in charge of cashing them in can safely do so.
If there is no such thing, you(r manager) should cash in the slips as the price for an important lesson, start doing normal bookkeeping and be happy the business has survived for so long. No business should be giving out thousands of dollars over years to employees without any proof of where that money went or even how much money went out.
answered Jan 15 at 10:17
DonQuiKongDonQuiKong
1,1891412
41
This. Surely there's a easily accessible paper trail that would reveal whether any payment was made.
– Jack Aidley
Jan 15 at 11:55
10
Best case the books should show a liability of wages not yet claimed (which is created when the payslips are made and normally moves on to costs for wages once paid out).
– cbeleites
Jan 15 at 12:37
56
Just be thankful it's an employee asking questions, and not the IRS
– Mawg
Jan 15 at 14:14
11
@JackAidley Many small businesses don't learn the value of the paper trail until they are burned by the lack of it.
– Myles
Jan 15 at 18:28
4
At which point the IRS is allowed to estimate your actual income and levy tax upon it. I doubt that they often underestimate. This one is unlikely to end well.
– Mawg
2 days ago
add a comment |
You (or whoever is responsible for that) look into the old books to see if the payslips were paid out. There should also be a folder with old payslips where the ones in question should be missing.
After that, the person in charge of cashing them in can safely do so.
If there is no such thing, you(r manager) should cash in the slips as the price for an important lesson, start doing normal bookkeeping and be happy the business has survived for so long. No business should be giving out thousands of dollars over years to employees without any proof of where that money went or even how much money went out.
answered Jan 15 at 10:17
DonQuiKongDonQuiKong
1,1891412
You (or whoever is responsible for that) look into the old books to see if the payslips were paid out. There should also be a folder with old payslips where the ones in question should be missing.
After that, the person in charge of cashing them in can safely do so.
If there is no such thing, you(r manager) should cash in the slips as the price for an important lesson, start doing normal bookkeeping and be happy the business has survived for so long. No business should be giving out thousands of dollars over years to employees without any proof of where that money went or even how much money went out.
answered Jan 15 at 10:17
DonQuiKongDonQuiKong
1,1891412
edited yesterday
answered Jan 15 at 10:17
DonQuiKongDonQuiKong
1,1891412
answered Jan 15 at 10:17
DonQuiKongDonQuiKong
1,1891412
answered Jan 15 at 10:17
DonQuiKongDonQuiKong
1,1891412
1,1891412
41
This. Surely there's a easily accessible paper trail that would reveal whether any payment was made.
– Jack Aidley
Jan 15 at 11:55
10
Best case the books should show a liability of wages not yet claimed (which is created when the payslips are made and normally moves on to costs for wages once paid out).
– cbeleites
Jan 15 at 12:37
56
Just be thankful it's an employee asking questions, and not the IRS
– Mawg
Jan 15 at 14:14
11
@JackAidley Many small businesses don't learn the value of the paper trail until they are burned by the lack of it.
– Myles
Jan 15 at 18:28
4
At which point the IRS is allowed to estimate your actual income and levy tax upon it. I doubt that they often underestimate. This one is unlikely to end well.
– Mawg
2 days ago
add a comment |
41
This. Surely there's a easily accessible paper trail that would reveal whether any payment was made.
– Jack Aidley
Jan 15 at 11:55
10
Best case the books should show a liability of wages not yet claimed (which is created when the payslips are made and normally moves on to costs for wages once paid out).
– cbeleites
Jan 15 at 12:37
56
Just be thankful it's an employee asking questions, and not the IRS
– Mawg
Jan 15 at 14:14
11
@JackAidley Many small businesses don't learn the value of the paper trail until they are burned by the lack of it.
– Myles
Jan 15 at 18:28
4
At which point the IRS is allowed to estimate your actual income and levy tax upon it. I doubt that they often underestimate. This one is unlikely to end well.
– Mawg
2 days ago
41
41
This. Surely there's a easily accessible paper trail that would reveal whether any payment was made.
– Jack Aidley
Jan 15 at 11:55
This. Surely there's a easily accessible paper trail that would reveal whether any payment was made.
– Jack Aidley
Jan 15 at 11:55
10
10
Best case the books should show a liability of wages not yet claimed (which is created when the payslips are made and normally moves on to costs for wages once paid out).
– cbeleites
Jan 15 at 12:37
Best case the books should show a liability of wages not yet claimed (which is created when the payslips are made and normally moves on to costs for wages once paid out).
– cbeleites
Jan 15 at 12:37
56
56
Just be thankful it's an employee asking questions, and not the IRS
– Mawg
Jan 15 at 14:14
Just be thankful it's an employee asking questions, and not the IRS
– Mawg
Jan 15 at 14:14
11
11
@JackAidley Many small businesses don't learn the value of the paper trail until they are burned by the lack of it.
– Myles
Jan 15 at 18:28
@JackAidley Many small businesses don't learn the value of the paper trail until they are burned by the lack of it.
– Myles
Jan 15 at 18:28
4
4
At which point the IRS is allowed to estimate your actual income and levy tax upon it. I doubt that they often underestimate. This one is unlikely to end well.
– Mawg
2 days ago
At which point the IRS is allowed to estimate your actual income and levy tax upon it. I doubt that they often underestimate. This one is unlikely to end well.
– Mawg
2 days ago
add a comment |
Talk to the owner or the manager. You don't want to be responsible for paying money for a payslip that already has been paid.
As you have noted this is highly unusual for somebody to hold onto these payslips. While it looks like they were never paid there might be some other story. Maybe they were lost and the restaurant replaced them, and they will no longer honor the original ones.
Don't pay any money until somebody with additional authority has approved them and takes responsibility for the situation.
answered Jan 15 at 0:10
mhoran_psprepmhoran_psprep
66.8k894172
3
Right on. There are so many unknowns here, you don't want to be the one making the calls if it could mean your butt on the line (assuming of course that OP isn't able to verify this pay history themselves).
– Broots Waymb
Jan 15 at 14:29
3
The other day I found $80 in the pocket of pants that I have not worn for over five years, so it might not be that unusual.
– trognanders
19 hours ago
add a comment |
Talk to the owner or the manager. You don't want to be responsible for paying money for a payslip that already has been paid.
As you have noted this is highly unusual for somebody to hold onto these payslips. While it looks like they were never paid there might be some other story. Maybe they were lost and the restaurant replaced them, and they will no longer honor the original ones.
Don't pay any money until somebody with additional authority has approved them and takes responsibility for the situation.
answered Jan 15 at 0:10
mhoran_psprepmhoran_psprep
66.8k894172
3
Right on. There are so many unknowns here, you don't want to be the one making the calls if it could mean your butt on the line (assuming of course that OP isn't able to verify this pay history themselves).
– Broots Waymb
Jan 15 at 14:29
3
The other day I found $80 in the pocket of pants that I have not worn for over five years, so it might not be that unusual.
– trognanders
19 hours ago
add a comment |
Talk to the owner or the manager. You don't want to be responsible for paying money for a payslip that already has been paid.
As you have noted this is highly unusual for somebody to hold onto these payslips. While it looks like they were never paid there might be some other story. Maybe they were lost and the restaurant replaced them, and they will no longer honor the original ones.
Don't pay any money until somebody with additional authority has approved them and takes responsibility for the situation.
answered Jan 15 at 0:10
mhoran_psprepmhoran_psprep
66.8k894172
Talk to the owner or the manager. You don't want to be responsible for paying money for a payslip that already has been paid.
As you have noted this is highly unusual for somebody to hold onto these payslips. While it looks like they were never paid there might be some other story. Maybe they were lost and the restaurant replaced them, and they will no longer honor the original ones.
Don't pay any money until somebody with additional authority has approved them and takes responsibility for the situation.
answered Jan 15 at 0:10
mhoran_psprepmhoran_psprep
66.8k894172
answered Jan 15 at 0:10
mhoran_psprepmhoran_psprep
66.8k894172
answered Jan 15 at 0:10
mhoran_psprepmhoran_psprep
66.8k894172
answered Jan 15 at 0:10
mhoran_psprepmhoran_psprep
66.8k894172
66.8k894172
3
Right on. There are so many unknowns here, you don't want to be the one making the calls if it could mean your butt on the line (assuming of course that OP isn't able to verify this pay history themselves).
– Broots Waymb
Jan 15 at 14:29
3
The other day I found $80 in the pocket of pants that I have not worn for over five years, so it might not be that unusual.
– trognanders
19 hours ago
add a comment |
3
Right on. There are so many unknowns here, you don't want to be the one making the calls if it could mean your butt on the line (assuming of course that OP isn't able to verify this pay history themselves).
– Broots Waymb
Jan 15 at 14:29
3
The other day I found $80 in the pocket of pants that I have not worn for over five years, so it might not be that unusual.
– trognanders
19 hours ago
3
3
Right on. There are so many unknowns here, you don't want to be the one making the calls if it could mean your butt on the line (assuming of course that OP isn't able to verify this pay history themselves).
– Broots Waymb
Jan 15 at 14:29
Right on. There are so many unknowns here, you don't want to be the one making the calls if it could mean your butt on the line (assuming of course that OP isn't able to verify this pay history themselves).
– Broots Waymb
Jan 15 at 14:29
3
3
The other day I found $80 in the pocket of pants that I have not worn for over five years, so it might not be that unusual.
– trognanders
19 hours ago
The other day I found $80 in the pocket of pants that I have not worn for over five years, so it might not be that unusual.
– trognanders
19 hours ago
add a comment |
Now she wants me to bring them into the office to see if they are any good.
Why are you invovled?
Why isn't she coming to the office?
How is this situation handled?
Give them back to her and let her bring them in.
Explain that you aren't authorized to cash anything except the ones that you hand out weekly, and let her take it up with someone senior to you (or someone like an accountant who can research this).
answered Jan 15 at 14:21
J. Chris ComptonJ. Chris Compton
6818
2
We don't know the asker's position in the business. If they're a shift supervisor or the cashier or some similar position, it's reasonable for the waitress to go to them.
– Mark
Jan 15 at 22:00
8
@Mark The original post was "Diana Head Waitress". My advice is that a head waitress shouldn't deal with three year old pay vouchers. Lots of things could be in play after three years. An example is the state's escheatment laws. (click on the "Edited X hours ago" to see the edits)
– J. Chris Compton
Jan 15 at 22:12
3
Well, I'm guessing the OP is involved because they have some level of management responsibility over the waitress, the process described for getting paid seems to be go to a random cash drawer, exchange slip for money and the waitress knows that just doing that this time around will be problematic and is smartly going up the chain to someone who can figure out what exactly should be done. Hierarchy typically has you report to your immediate supervisor with such questions rather than knocking immediately on the CEO's door.
– iheanyi
yesterday
@iheanyi What you posted is correct in general about hierarchy - and my advice is step aside / pass her up the chain. Honestly, I smell a rat because the other employee wants OP to bring them in for her. If it was up-and-up she would be asking this question at the workplace. The whole "cash your own payslip" also seems fishy to me, (two sets of books?) but that's not her question.
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
1
@iheanyi Maybe we are saying the same thing? I said that OP should "Give them back to her and let her bring them in." By that I meant that the OP should give the old pay-stubs back if she has them, and tell the other employee to talk to someone else above her. Whatever OP's role is, and that is unclear, her role doesn't seem to involve payroll (except passing out the checks and getting signatures).
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
Now she wants me to bring them into the office to see if they are any good.
Why are you invovled?
Why isn't she coming to the office?
How is this situation handled?
Give them back to her and let her bring them in.
Explain that you aren't authorized to cash anything except the ones that you hand out weekly, and let her take it up with someone senior to you (or someone like an accountant who can research this).
answered Jan 15 at 14:21
J. Chris ComptonJ. Chris Compton
6818
2
We don't know the asker's position in the business. If they're a shift supervisor or the cashier or some similar position, it's reasonable for the waitress to go to them.
– Mark
Jan 15 at 22:00
8
@Mark The original post was "Diana Head Waitress". My advice is that a head waitress shouldn't deal with three year old pay vouchers. Lots of things could be in play after three years. An example is the state's escheatment laws. (click on the "Edited X hours ago" to see the edits)
– J. Chris Compton
Jan 15 at 22:12
3
Well, I'm guessing the OP is involved because they have some level of management responsibility over the waitress, the process described for getting paid seems to be go to a random cash drawer, exchange slip for money and the waitress knows that just doing that this time around will be problematic and is smartly going up the chain to someone who can figure out what exactly should be done. Hierarchy typically has you report to your immediate supervisor with such questions rather than knocking immediately on the CEO's door.
– iheanyi
yesterday
@iheanyi What you posted is correct in general about hierarchy - and my advice is step aside / pass her up the chain. Honestly, I smell a rat because the other employee wants OP to bring them in for her. If it was up-and-up she would be asking this question at the workplace. The whole "cash your own payslip" also seems fishy to me, (two sets of books?) but that's not her question.
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
1
@iheanyi Maybe we are saying the same thing? I said that OP should "Give them back to her and let her bring them in." By that I meant that the OP should give the old pay-stubs back if she has them, and tell the other employee to talk to someone else above her. Whatever OP's role is, and that is unclear, her role doesn't seem to involve payroll (except passing out the checks and getting signatures).
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
Now she wants me to bring them into the office to see if they are any good.
Why are you invovled?
Why isn't she coming to the office?
How is this situation handled?
Give them back to her and let her bring them in.
Explain that you aren't authorized to cash anything except the ones that you hand out weekly, and let her take it up with someone senior to you (or someone like an accountant who can research this).
answered Jan 15 at 14:21
J. Chris ComptonJ. Chris Compton
6818
Now she wants me to bring them into the office to see if they are any good.
Why are you invovled?
Why isn't she coming to the office?
How is this situation handled?
Give them back to her and let her bring them in.
Explain that you aren't authorized to cash anything except the ones that you hand out weekly, and let her take it up with someone senior to you (or someone like an accountant who can research this).
answered Jan 15 at 14:21
J. Chris ComptonJ. Chris Compton
6818
edited Jan 15 at 21:13
answered Jan 15 at 14:21
J. Chris ComptonJ. Chris Compton
6818
answered Jan 15 at 14:21
J. Chris ComptonJ. Chris Compton
6818
answered Jan 15 at 14:21
J. Chris ComptonJ. Chris Compton
6818
6818
2
We don't know the asker's position in the business. If they're a shift supervisor or the cashier or some similar position, it's reasonable for the waitress to go to them.
– Mark
Jan 15 at 22:00
8
@Mark The original post was "Diana Head Waitress". My advice is that a head waitress shouldn't deal with three year old pay vouchers. Lots of things could be in play after three years. An example is the state's escheatment laws. (click on the "Edited X hours ago" to see the edits)
– J. Chris Compton
Jan 15 at 22:12
3
Well, I'm guessing the OP is involved because they have some level of management responsibility over the waitress, the process described for getting paid seems to be go to a random cash drawer, exchange slip for money and the waitress knows that just doing that this time around will be problematic and is smartly going up the chain to someone who can figure out what exactly should be done. Hierarchy typically has you report to your immediate supervisor with such questions rather than knocking immediately on the CEO's door.
– iheanyi
yesterday
@iheanyi What you posted is correct in general about hierarchy - and my advice is step aside / pass her up the chain. Honestly, I smell a rat because the other employee wants OP to bring them in for her. If it was up-and-up she would be asking this question at the workplace. The whole "cash your own payslip" also seems fishy to me, (two sets of books?) but that's not her question.
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
1
@iheanyi Maybe we are saying the same thing? I said that OP should "Give them back to her and let her bring them in." By that I meant that the OP should give the old pay-stubs back if she has them, and tell the other employee to talk to someone else above her. Whatever OP's role is, and that is unclear, her role doesn't seem to involve payroll (except passing out the checks and getting signatures).
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
2
We don't know the asker's position in the business. If they're a shift supervisor or the cashier or some similar position, it's reasonable for the waitress to go to them.
– Mark
Jan 15 at 22:00
8
@Mark The original post was "Diana Head Waitress". My advice is that a head waitress shouldn't deal with three year old pay vouchers. Lots of things could be in play after three years. An example is the state's escheatment laws. (click on the "Edited X hours ago" to see the edits)
– J. Chris Compton
Jan 15 at 22:12
3
Well, I'm guessing the OP is involved because they have some level of management responsibility over the waitress, the process described for getting paid seems to be go to a random cash drawer, exchange slip for money and the waitress knows that just doing that this time around will be problematic and is smartly going up the chain to someone who can figure out what exactly should be done. Hierarchy typically has you report to your immediate supervisor with such questions rather than knocking immediately on the CEO's door.
– iheanyi
yesterday
@iheanyi What you posted is correct in general about hierarchy - and my advice is step aside / pass her up the chain. Honestly, I smell a rat because the other employee wants OP to bring them in for her. If it was up-and-up she would be asking this question at the workplace. The whole "cash your own payslip" also seems fishy to me, (two sets of books?) but that's not her question.
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
1
@iheanyi Maybe we are saying the same thing? I said that OP should "Give them back to her and let her bring them in." By that I meant that the OP should give the old pay-stubs back if she has them, and tell the other employee to talk to someone else above her. Whatever OP's role is, and that is unclear, her role doesn't seem to involve payroll (except passing out the checks and getting signatures).
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
2
2
We don't know the asker's position in the business. If they're a shift supervisor or the cashier or some similar position, it's reasonable for the waitress to go to them.
– Mark
Jan 15 at 22:00
We don't know the asker's position in the business. If they're a shift supervisor or the cashier or some similar position, it's reasonable for the waitress to go to them.
– Mark
Jan 15 at 22:00
8
8
@Mark The original post was "Diana Head Waitress". My advice is that a head waitress shouldn't deal with three year old pay vouchers. Lots of things could be in play after three years. An example is the state's escheatment laws. (click on the "Edited X hours ago" to see the edits)
– J. Chris Compton
Jan 15 at 22:12
@Mark The original post was "Diana Head Waitress". My advice is that a head waitress shouldn't deal with three year old pay vouchers. Lots of things could be in play after three years. An example is the state's escheatment laws. (click on the "Edited X hours ago" to see the edits)
– J. Chris Compton
Jan 15 at 22:12
3
3
Well, I'm guessing the OP is involved because they have some level of management responsibility over the waitress, the process described for getting paid seems to be go to a random cash drawer, exchange slip for money and the waitress knows that just doing that this time around will be problematic and is smartly going up the chain to someone who can figure out what exactly should be done. Hierarchy typically has you report to your immediate supervisor with such questions rather than knocking immediately on the CEO's door.
– iheanyi
yesterday
Well, I'm guessing the OP is involved because they have some level of management responsibility over the waitress, the process described for getting paid seems to be go to a random cash drawer, exchange slip for money and the waitress knows that just doing that this time around will be problematic and is smartly going up the chain to someone who can figure out what exactly should be done. Hierarchy typically has you report to your immediate supervisor with such questions rather than knocking immediately on the CEO's door.
– iheanyi
yesterday
@iheanyi What you posted is correct in general about hierarchy - and my advice is step aside / pass her up the chain. Honestly, I smell a rat because the other employee wants OP to bring them in for her. If it was up-and-up she would be asking this question at the workplace. The whole "cash your own payslip" also seems fishy to me, (two sets of books?) but that's not her question.
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
@iheanyi What you posted is correct in general about hierarchy - and my advice is step aside / pass her up the chain. Honestly, I smell a rat because the other employee wants OP to bring them in for her. If it was up-and-up she would be asking this question at the workplace. The whole "cash your own payslip" also seems fishy to me, (two sets of books?) but that's not her question.
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
1
1
@iheanyi Maybe we are saying the same thing? I said that OP should "Give them back to her and let her bring them in." By that I meant that the OP should give the old pay-stubs back if she has them, and tell the other employee to talk to someone else above her. Whatever OP's role is, and that is unclear, her role doesn't seem to involve payroll (except passing out the checks and getting signatures).
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
@iheanyi Maybe we are saying the same thing? I said that OP should "Give them back to her and let her bring them in." By that I meant that the OP should give the old pay-stubs back if she has them, and tell the other employee to talk to someone else above her. Whatever OP's role is, and that is unclear, her role doesn't seem to involve payroll (except passing out the checks and getting signatures).
– J. Chris Compton
yesterday
|
show 3 more comments
If the payslips are genuine, and if you're confident there is no scam going on, then you should pay. To be safe, you should check with your manager first.
edited Jan 14 at 23:49
JoeTaxpayer♦
143k22229461
answered Jan 14 at 23:44
gnasher729gnasher729
9,08921228
2
I would say this is very bad advice. If this is a scam, being "confident there is no scam going on" is exactly what the scammer is banking on. Don't assume anything, and take this higher up.
– ohyeah
Jan 15 at 8:00
3
@ohyeah I agree that the individual asking the question shouldn't just pay up on the strength of their own "confidence", but it's absolutely worth remembering that if the story is correct then this is money that the employee is owed in exchange for work already done, so in that respect it absolutely should be paid up when it is verified.
– Rob Moir
Jan 15 at 8:15
Even if there's no scam, there could be a mistake. The waitress might have lost these pay stubs, requested replacements at the time, and then forgotten about the whole thing by now.
– ruakh
Jan 16 at 0:42
@ohyeah aren't they in the same position with regular payslips? Assuming there's no scam going on and not verifying with management that the payslips contain accurate information? Barn door is already open.
– iheanyi
yesterday
add a comment |
If the payslips are genuine, and if you're confident there is no scam going on, then you should pay. To be safe, you should check with your manager first.
edited Jan 14 at 23:49
JoeTaxpayer♦
143k22229461
answered Jan 14 at 23:44
gnasher729gnasher729
9,08921228
2
I would say this is very bad advice. If this is a scam, being "confident there is no scam going on" is exactly what the scammer is banking on. Don't assume anything, and take this higher up.
– ohyeah
Jan 15 at 8:00
3
@ohyeah I agree that the individual asking the question shouldn't just pay up on the strength of their own "confidence", but it's absolutely worth remembering that if the story is correct then this is money that the employee is owed in exchange for work already done, so in that respect it absolutely should be paid up when it is verified.
– Rob Moir
Jan 15 at 8:15
Even if there's no scam, there could be a mistake. The waitress might have lost these pay stubs, requested replacements at the time, and then forgotten about the whole thing by now.
– ruakh
Jan 16 at 0:42
@ohyeah aren't they in the same position with regular payslips? Assuming there's no scam going on and not verifying with management that the payslips contain accurate information? Barn door is already open.
– iheanyi
yesterday
add a comment |
If the payslips are genuine, and if you're confident there is no scam going on, then you should pay. To be safe, you should check with your manager first.
edited Jan 14 at 23:49
JoeTaxpayer♦
143k22229461
answered Jan 14 at 23:44
gnasher729gnasher729
9,08921228
If the payslips are genuine, and if you're confident there is no scam going on, then you should pay. To be safe, you should check with your manager first.
edited Jan 14 at 23:49
JoeTaxpayer♦
143k22229461
answered Jan 14 at 23:44
gnasher729gnasher729
9,08921228
edited Jan 14 at 23:49
JoeTaxpayer♦
143k22229461
edited Jan 14 at 23:49
JoeTaxpayer♦
143k22229461
edited Jan 14 at 23:49
JoeTaxpayer♦
143k22229461
143k22229461
answered Jan 14 at 23:44
gnasher729gnasher729
9,08921228
answered Jan 14 at 23:44
gnasher729gnasher729
9,08921228
answered Jan 14 at 23:44
gnasher729gnasher729
9,08921228
9,08921228
2
I would say this is very bad advice. If this is a scam, being "confident there is no scam going on" is exactly what the scammer is banking on. Don't assume anything, and take this higher up.
– ohyeah
Jan 15 at 8:00
3
@ohyeah I agree that the individual asking the question shouldn't just pay up on the strength of their own "confidence", but it's absolutely worth remembering that if the story is correct then this is money that the employee is owed in exchange for work already done, so in that respect it absolutely should be paid up when it is verified.
– Rob Moir
Jan 15 at 8:15
Even if there's no scam, there could be a mistake. The waitress might have lost these pay stubs, requested replacements at the time, and then forgotten about the whole thing by now.
– ruakh
Jan 16 at 0:42
@ohyeah aren't they in the same position with regular payslips? Assuming there's no scam going on and not verifying with management that the payslips contain accurate information? Barn door is already open.
– iheanyi
yesterday
add a comment |
2
I would say this is very bad advice. If this is a scam, being "confident there is no scam going on" is exactly what the scammer is banking on. Don't assume anything, and take this higher up.
– ohyeah
Jan 15 at 8:00
3
@ohyeah I agree that the individual asking the question shouldn't just pay up on the strength of their own "confidence", but it's absolutely worth remembering that if the story is correct then this is money that the employee is owed in exchange for work already done, so in that respect it absolutely should be paid up when it is verified.
– Rob Moir
Jan 15 at 8:15
Even if there's no scam, there could be a mistake. The waitress might have lost these pay stubs, requested replacements at the time, and then forgotten about the whole thing by now.
– ruakh
Jan 16 at 0:42
@ohyeah aren't they in the same position with regular payslips? Assuming there's no scam going on and not verifying with management that the payslips contain accurate information? Barn door is already open.
– iheanyi
yesterday
2
2
I would say this is very bad advice. If this is a scam, being "confident there is no scam going on" is exactly what the scammer is banking on. Don't assume anything, and take this higher up.
– ohyeah
Jan 15 at 8:00
I would say this is very bad advice. If this is a scam, being "confident there is no scam going on" is exactly what the scammer is banking on. Don't assume anything, and take this higher up.
– ohyeah
Jan 15 at 8:00
3
3
@ohyeah I agree that the individual asking the question shouldn't just pay up on the strength of their own "confidence", but it's absolutely worth remembering that if the story is correct then this is money that the employee is owed in exchange for work already done, so in that respect it absolutely should be paid up when it is verified.
– Rob Moir
Jan 15 at 8:15
@ohyeah I agree that the individual asking the question shouldn't just pay up on the strength of their own "confidence", but it's absolutely worth remembering that if the story is correct then this is money that the employee is owed in exchange for work already done, so in that respect it absolutely should be paid up when it is verified.
– Rob Moir
Jan 15 at 8:15
Even if there's no scam, there could be a mistake. The waitress might have lost these pay stubs, requested replacements at the time, and then forgotten about the whole thing by now.
– ruakh
Jan 16 at 0:42
Even if there's no scam, there could be a mistake. The waitress might have lost these pay stubs, requested replacements at the time, and then forgotten about the whole thing by now.
– ruakh
Jan 16 at 0:42
@ohyeah aren't they in the same position with regular payslips? Assuming there's no scam going on and not verifying with management that the payslips contain accurate information? Barn door is already open.
– iheanyi
yesterday
@ohyeah aren't they in the same position with regular payslips? Assuming there's no scam going on and not verifying with management that the payslips contain accurate information? Barn door is already open.
– iheanyi
yesterday
add a comment |
Be aware that depending on which US state you are in, it is quite possible that these payslips are no longer valid, even if they are genuine.
It also matters whether the waitress has a written work contract. Depending on these parameters, the corresponding statue of limitations may say anything from "1 year" to "20 years".
So, in addition to making sure that the payslips are genuine, and in addition to cross-checking the books for a double charge-in, you should first of all be sure the period of limitation for your specific scenario hasn't passed (this is faster and easier to do than checking the books, if you're lucky you need not do that, after all).
Failure to do so may end with you having to explain to your manager, and probably refunding the money, if this goes the wrong way.
answered Jan 15 at 13:51
DamonDamon
1073
27
Yes, screwing a long term employee out of 300 dollars due to legal reason might be easier. But it's definitly not wiser. And economically the cost of an unhappy employee and a bad reputation will cost a lot more.
– DonQuiKong
Jan 15 at 14:18
11
If the owner has any idea about leading a company, they will see it that way. I don't understand the communism part, it doesn't seem to have any connection to the rest of my comment, your answer or the question. Can you explain?
– DonQuiKong
Jan 15 at 14:38
9
Employee worked, didn't get paid. I don't see how this situation ends in any way other than 'employee gets paid'. It's not about whether or not you need to honor these payslips. The employee should have been paid. It's not their fault (legally) that they weren't.
– xyious
Jan 15 at 16:01
2
@Damon, in every state I've looked at, the money is hers. You may have been obliged to turn it over to the state's "unclaimed property" office after a period of time, but there are no grounds under which you can keep the money.
– Mark
Jan 15 at 22:02
6
@DonQuiKong, in the US, this situation isn't considered a debt, it's considered unclaimed property or similar. There's no time limit on this -- theoretically, her great-grandchildren could find those unclaimed pay slips and redeem them (if everyone's following the rules, the company will have turned the money over to the state, and her heirs won't need to track down the successor to a company that went out of business a century ago).
– Mark
Jan 15 at 22:07
|
show 5 more comments
Be aware that depending on which US state you are in, it is quite possible that these payslips are no longer valid, even if they are genuine.
It also matters whether the waitress has a written work contract. Depending on these parameters, the corresponding statue of limitations may say anything from "1 year" to "20 years".
So, in addition to making sure that the payslips are genuine, and in addition to cross-checking the books for a double charge-in, you should first of all be sure the period of limitation for your specific scenario hasn't passed (this is faster and easier to do than checking the books, if you're lucky you need not do that, after all).
Failure to do so may end with you having to explain to your manager, and probably refunding the money, if this goes the wrong way.
answered Jan 15 at 13:51
DamonDamon
1073
27
Yes, screwing a long term employee out of 300 dollars due to legal reason might be easier. But it's definitly not wiser. And economically the cost of an unhappy employee and a bad reputation will cost a lot more.
– DonQuiKong
Jan 15 at 14:18
11
If the owner has any idea about leading a company, they will see it that way. I don't understand the communism part, it doesn't seem to have any connection to the rest of my comment, your answer or the question. Can you explain?
– DonQuiKong
Jan 15 at 14:38
9
Employee worked, didn't get paid. I don't see how this situation ends in any way other than 'employee gets paid'. It's not about whether or not you need to honor these payslips. The employee should have been paid. It's not their fault (legally) that they weren't.
– xyious
Jan 15 at 16:01
2
@Damon, in every state I've looked at, the money is hers. You may have been obliged to turn it over to the state's "unclaimed property" office after a period of time, but there are no grounds under which you can keep the money.
– Mark
Jan 15 at 22:02
6
@DonQuiKong, in the US, this situation isn't considered a debt, it's considered unclaimed property or similar. There's no time limit on this -- theoretically, her great-grandchildren could find those unclaimed pay slips and redeem them (if everyone's following the rules, the company will have turned the money over to the state, and her heirs won't need to track down the successor to a company that went out of business a century ago).
– Mark
Jan 15 at 22:07
|
show 5 more comments
Be aware that depending on which US state you are in, it is quite possible that these payslips are no longer valid, even if they are genuine.
It also matters whether the waitress has a written work contract. Depending on these parameters, the corresponding statue of limitations may say anything from "1 year" to "20 years".
So, in addition to making sure that the payslips are genuine, and in addition to cross-checking the books for a double charge-in, you should first of all be sure the period of limitation for your specific scenario hasn't passed (this is faster and easier to do than checking the books, if you're lucky you need not do that, after all).
Failure to do so may end with you having to explain to your manager, and probably refunding the money, if this goes the wrong way.
answered Jan 15 at 13:51
DamonDamon
1073
Be aware that depending on which US state you are in, it is quite possible that these payslips are no longer valid, even if they are genuine.
It also matters whether the waitress has a written work contract. Depending on these parameters, the corresponding statue of limitations may say anything from "1 year" to "20 years".
So, in addition to making sure that the payslips are genuine, and in addition to cross-checking the books for a double charge-in, you should first of all be sure the period of limitation for your specific scenario hasn't passed (this is faster and easier to do than checking the books, if you're lucky you need not do that, after all).
Failure to do so may end with you having to explain to your manager, and probably refunding the money, if this goes the wrong way.
answered Jan 15 at 13:51
DamonDamon
1073
answered Jan 15 at 13:51
DamonDamon
1073
answered Jan 15 at 13:51
DamonDamon
1073
answered Jan 15 at 13:51
DamonDamon
1073
1073
27
Yes, screwing a long term employee out of 300 dollars due to legal reason might be easier. But it's definitly not wiser. And economically the cost of an unhappy employee and a bad reputation will cost a lot more.
– DonQuiKong
Jan 15 at 14:18
11
If the owner has any idea about leading a company, they will see it that way. I don't understand the communism part, it doesn't seem to have any connection to the rest of my comment, your answer or the question. Can you explain?
– DonQuiKong
Jan 15 at 14:38
9
Employee worked, didn't get paid. I don't see how this situation ends in any way other than 'employee gets paid'. It's not about whether or not you need to honor these payslips. The employee should have been paid. It's not their fault (legally) that they weren't.
– xyious
Jan 15 at 16:01
2
@Damon, in every state I've looked at, the money is hers. You may have been obliged to turn it over to the state's "unclaimed property" office after a period of time, but there are no grounds under which you can keep the money.
– Mark
Jan 15 at 22:02
6
@DonQuiKong, in the US, this situation isn't considered a debt, it's considered unclaimed property or similar. There's no time limit on this -- theoretically, her great-grandchildren could find those unclaimed pay slips and redeem them (if everyone's following the rules, the company will have turned the money over to the state, and her heirs won't need to track down the successor to a company that went out of business a century ago).
– Mark
Jan 15 at 22:07
|
show 5 more comments
27
Yes, screwing a long term employee out of 300 dollars due to legal reason might be easier. But it's definitly not wiser. And economically the cost of an unhappy employee and a bad reputation will cost a lot more.
– DonQuiKong
Jan 15 at 14:18
11
If the owner has any idea about leading a company, they will see it that way. I don't understand the communism part, it doesn't seem to have any connection to the rest of my comment, your answer or the question. Can you explain?
– DonQuiKong
Jan 15 at 14:38
9
Employee worked, didn't get paid. I don't see how this situation ends in any way other than 'employee gets paid'. It's not about whether or not you need to honor these payslips. The employee should have been paid. It's not their fault (legally) that they weren't.
– xyious
Jan 15 at 16:01
2
@Damon, in every state I've looked at, the money is hers. You may have been obliged to turn it over to the state's "unclaimed property" office after a period of time, but there are no grounds under which you can keep the money.
– Mark
Jan 15 at 22:02
6
@DonQuiKong, in the US, this situation isn't considered a debt, it's considered unclaimed property or similar. There's no time limit on this -- theoretically, her great-grandchildren could find those unclaimed pay slips and redeem them (if everyone's following the rules, the company will have turned the money over to the state, and her heirs won't need to track down the successor to a company that went out of business a century ago).
– Mark
Jan 15 at 22:07
27
27
Yes, screwing a long term employee out of 300 dollars due to legal reason might be easier. But it's definitly not wiser. And economically the cost of an unhappy employee and a bad reputation will cost a lot more.
– DonQuiKong
Jan 15 at 14:18
Yes, screwing a long term employee out of 300 dollars due to legal reason might be easier. But it's definitly not wiser. And economically the cost of an unhappy employee and a bad reputation will cost a lot more.
– DonQuiKong
Jan 15 at 14:18
11
11
If the owner has any idea about leading a company, they will see it that way. I don't understand the communism part, it doesn't seem to have any connection to the rest of my comment, your answer or the question. Can you explain?
– DonQuiKong
Jan 15 at 14:38
If the owner has any idea about leading a company, they will see it that way. I don't understand the communism part, it doesn't seem to have any connection to the rest of my comment, your answer or the question. Can you explain?
– DonQuiKong
Jan 15 at 14:38
9
9
Employee worked, didn't get paid. I don't see how this situation ends in any way other than 'employee gets paid'. It's not about whether or not you need to honor these payslips. The employee should have been paid. It's not their fault (legally) that they weren't.
– xyious
Jan 15 at 16:01
Employee worked, didn't get paid. I don't see how this situation ends in any way other than 'employee gets paid'. It's not about whether or not you need to honor these payslips. The employee should have been paid. It's not their fault (legally) that they weren't.
– xyious
Jan 15 at 16:01
2
2
@Damon, in every state I've looked at, the money is hers. You may have been obliged to turn it over to the state's "unclaimed property" office after a period of time, but there are no grounds under which you can keep the money.
– Mark
Jan 15 at 22:02
@Damon, in every state I've looked at, the money is hers. You may have been obliged to turn it over to the state's "unclaimed property" office after a period of time, but there are no grounds under which you can keep the money.
– Mark
Jan 15 at 22:02
6
6
@DonQuiKong, in the US, this situation isn't considered a debt, it's considered unclaimed property or similar. There's no time limit on this -- theoretically, her great-grandchildren could find those unclaimed pay slips and redeem them (if everyone's following the rules, the company will have turned the money over to the state, and her heirs won't need to track down the successor to a company that went out of business a century ago).
– Mark
Jan 15 at 22:07
@DonQuiKong, in the US, this situation isn't considered a debt, it's considered unclaimed property or similar. There's no time limit on this -- theoretically, her great-grandchildren could find those unclaimed pay slips and redeem them (if everyone's following the rules, the company will have turned the money over to the state, and her heirs won't need to track down the successor to a company that went out of business a century ago).
– Mark
Jan 15 at 22:07
|
show 5 more comments
Diana is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Diana is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Diana is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Diana is a new contributor. Be nice, and check out our Code of Conduct.
Thanks for contributing an answer to Personal Finance & Money Stack Exchange!
- Please be sure to answer the question. Provide details and share your research!
But avoid …
- Asking for help, clarification, or responding to other answers.
- Making statements based on opinion; back them up with references or personal experience.
To learn more, see our tips on writing great answers.
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
StackExchange.ready(
function () {
StackExchange.openid.initPostLogin('.new-post-login', 'https%3a%2f%2fmoney.stackexchange.com%2fquestions%2f104062%2fhandling-waitress-unclaimed-pay-from-three-years-ago%23new-answer', 'question_page');
}
);
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Sign up or log in
StackExchange.ready(function () {
StackExchange.helpers.onClickDraftSave('#login-link');
});
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Sign up using Google
Sign up using Facebook
Sign up using Email and Password
Post as a guest
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
Required, but never shown
16
Do the payslips have an expiry date?
– Hart CO
Jan 14 at 23:45
122
I don't understand why there's any question? If this employee is a good employee (and after working there for 7 years, she must be), unless you find her to be particularly untrustworthy, just pay her - if she's working full time, $300 must be less than 1% of her annual pay, so even if she's scamming you (on purpose or by accident), it's not a lot of money.
– Johnny
Jan 15 at 5:09
69
@Johnny The only question I can see is "I don't have an accounting system, so what do I do now something has happened and I need one?" The only answer IMO is "be thankful this is only an issue over allegedly unpaid bills for $300, and not for $300,000." At least it's not worth going to court over $300, though she can still bad mouth you and you don't have many options to redress that - firing a long-term employer because (in her opinion) you never paid her wages isn't going to be good business publicity.
– alephzero
Jan 15 at 14:14
28
Surely this restaurant pays taxes? So, presumably, it has someone with the title “accountant”? Who has head of double entry bookkeeping? What’s the plan if the restaurant gets audited?
– Mawg
Jan 15 at 14:17
19
@Mawg I'm guessing that an employer that handles paychecks in this fashion is paying these employees under the table. Handing out cash in exchange for time-slips seems to me that they are not reporting these wages.
– Rich
Jan 15 at 15:41